
Gem Grab
308,059 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 43 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,784 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 203 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,784 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 203 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (367 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
62.3% | 18460 | 100 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Bo |
58.3% | 50010 | 100 | 2.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Damian |
57.9% | 11625 | 95 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Wendy |
56.6% | 146378 | 100 | 7.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Starr Nova |
56.6% | 22836 | 100 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Bibi |
55.6% | 36795 | 100 | 2.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 1 | Ash |
55.5% | 10046 | 93 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Griff |
54.8% | 52920 | 100 | 2.9% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 3 | Sirius |
54.6% | 16376 | 100 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | – | Rico |
54.2% | 68229 | 100 | 3.7% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Clancy |
54.8% | 9509 | 92 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 3 | Moe |
54.8% | 5866 | 85 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Mortis |
53.7% | 50488 | 100 | 2.7% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Surge |
53.6% | 44676 | 100 | 2.4% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 2 | Janet |
54.2% | 6736 | 87 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
53.9% | 8473 | 90 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Nori |
53.2% | 40528 | 100 | 2.2% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Tara |
53.4% | 20262 | 100 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
52.6% | 116985 | 100 | 6.3% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Lumi |
53.5% | 6933 | 87 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 2 | Emz |
52.3% | 67144 | 100 | 3.6% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Shade |
52.8% | 12826 | 97 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▼ 2 | Chester |
52.3% | 18422 | 100 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Lily |
52.1% | 22925 | 100 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 1 | Kenji |
52.1% | 22529 | 100 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 2 | Gigi |
52.5% | 4975 | 83 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 2 | Ruffs |
52.3% | 6705 | 87 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 1 | Mico |
52.2% | 7493 | 89 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 29 | – | Crow |
51.5% | 46158 | 100 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | Alli |
51.9% | 8641 | 91 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 1 | Fang |
50.9% | 25019 | 100 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Pierce |
51.0% | 9050 | 91 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Sandy |
50.8% | 12285 | 96 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 1 | Spike |
50.4% | 29935 | 100 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 1 | Finx |
51.2% | 5165 | 83 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 5 | Charlie |
50.9% | 7779 | 89 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 1 | Kit |
50.3% | 15973 | 100 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 1 | Carl |
50.3% | 16003 | 100 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Jessie |
49.9% | 22427 | 100 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Tick |
49.8% | 26045 | 100 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 2 | Pearl |
50.1% | 9889 | 93 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Draco |
50.6% | 4127 | 80 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 5 | Doug |
50.0% | 8410 | 90 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Trunk |
50.0% | 6467 | 86 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 2 | Jae-Yong |
50.4% | 3206 | 76 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 1 | Leon |
49.2% | 28222 | 100 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
48.9% | 15722 | 100 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 1 | Cordelius |
48.7% | 15618 | 100 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 1 | 8-Bit |
48.4% | 26162 | 100 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 1 | Amber |
48.0% | 8249 | 90 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 1 | Buzz |
47.7% | 14937 | 99 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 2 | Meeple |
47.9% | 7940 | 90 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▲ 6 | Squeak |
47.4% | 17401 | 100 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▼ 1 | Hank |
47.8% | 5549 | 84 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Juju |
48.1% | 2965 | 75 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▲ 2 | Otis |
47.3% | 10920 | 94 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 57 | – | Max |
47.2% | 13007 | 97 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▲ 7 | Sprout |
47.7% | 4852 | 82 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▼ 3 | Kaze |
47.3% | 8454 | 90 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 3 | Larry & Lawrie |
47.4% | 6369 | 86 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 1 | Ziggy |
47.7% | 3186 | 76 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
47.5% | 4200 | 80 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 9 | R-T |
47.5% | 3498 | 77 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Penny |
46.5% | 15945 | 100 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 3 | Meg |
46.3% | 14102 | 98 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 2 | Gale |
45.9% | 12401 | 96 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 4 | Sam |
46.2% | 5261 | 83 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 2 | Najia |
46.1% | 5763 | 85 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 2 | Bull |
45.4% | 24613 | 100 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 2 | Lola |
45.9% | 5658 | 84 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 2 | Nita |
45.3% | 21017 | 100 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 2 | Mr. P |
45.7% | 8069 | 90 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 2 | Buster |
45.4% | 4655 | 82 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 2 | Ollie |
45.5% | 3399 | 77 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 2 | Dynamike |
44.7% | 23043 | 100 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 2 | Lou |
44.8% | 8905 | 91 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Frank |
44.2% | 17293 | 100 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Gray |
44.3% | 6256 | 86 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Maisie |
44.0% | 7958 | 90 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 1 | Melodie |
44.1% | 5004 | 83 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
43.5% | 8597 | 91 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Darryl |
43.2% | 14450 | 98 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Mandy |
42.7% | 8936 | 91 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
42.4% | 18021 | 100 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Brock |
42.3% | 32212 | 100 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 1 | Eve |
42.9% | 4554 | 81 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Rosa |
42.0% | 13770 | 98 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Byron |
41.3% | 11766 | 95 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Nani |
41.0% | 7271 | 88 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | Jacky |
40.6% | 8741 | 91 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
40.6% | 3941 | 79 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Poco |
39.6% | 18501 | 100 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Gus |
39.5% | 8539 | 91 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 3 | Shelly |
39.1% | 22859 | 100 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Colt |
38.8% | 27966 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 2 | Bea |
39.0% | 9780 | 93 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 1 | Gene |
39.0% | 8169 | 90 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 5 | Willow |
39.1% | 4706 | 82 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Bonnie |
38.8% | 5480 | 84 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Grom |
38.5% | 7731 | 89 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Berry |
37.4% | 6867 | 87 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Belle |
37.3% | 6607 | 87 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
35.0% | 15606 | 100 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 1 | Piper |
35.0% | 10529 | 94 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Angelo |
34.7% | 3125 | 76 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Barley |
32.5% | 11407 | 95 | 0.6% | Rather not |