
Bounty
62,692 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 48 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 4,726 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 232 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 4,726 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 232 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (178 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
68.5% | 13044 | 97 | 3.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Wendy |
70.5% | 1596 | 66 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
61.1% | 11215 | 95 | 3.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Starr Nova |
61.5% | 2854 | 74 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Pierce |
59.3% | 12159 | 96 | 3.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Glowy |
61.7% | 1280 | 62 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Najia |
59.0% | 3553 | 77 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Gigi |
60.0% | 1415 | 64 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Mina |
58.1% | 5417 | 84 | 1.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 2 | Sprout |
58.2% | 2513 | 72 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Meeple |
57.3% | 3061 | 75 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 2 | Gray |
56.5% | 6170 | 86 | 1.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Ruffs |
58.5% | 1195 | 61 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 3 | Damian |
61.0% | 515 | 49 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
55.8% | 7390 | 88 | 2.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 3 | Jae-Yong |
58.5% | 793 | 55 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 2 | 8-Bit |
55.2% | 6071 | 86 | 1.6% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 2 | Kaze |
55.7% | 3642 | 78 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 2 | Max |
54.9% | 9036 | 91 | 2.4% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Mico |
56.5% | 1183 | 61 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Kit |
54.6% | 2904 | 74 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 1 | Angelo |
54.3% | 3234 | 76 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▼ 1 | Pearl |
54.2% | 2225 | 70 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 6 | Stu |
53.6% | 3255 | 76 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Gus |
53.3% | 4696 | 82 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | – | Brock |
52.2% | 20995 | 100 | 5.6% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▲ 9 | R-T |
55.1% | 997 | 58 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▼ 4 | Alli |
55.1% | 936 | 58 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▼ 2 | Gene |
52.9% | 4329 | 80 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▼ 2 | Lola |
55.3% | 750 | 54 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▼ 2 | Byron |
51.8% | 18154 | 100 | 4.8% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▲ 5 | Ziggy |
55.0% | 796 | 55 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▲ 1 | Mandy |
51.8% | 10142 | 93 | 2.7% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▼ 2 | Mortis |
51.7% | 11205 | 95 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | ▼ 4 | Piper |
51.2% | 41146 | 100 | 10.9% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | ▼ 3 | Belle |
51.8% | 7249 | 88 | 1.9% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | ▲ 5 | Bo |
52.3% | 2037 | 69 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 3 | Doug |
54.6% | 540 | 49 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Lumi |
53.9% | 646 | 52 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 3 | Sirius |
53.1% | 827 | 56 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 3 | Juju |
54.3% | 422 | 46 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 1 | Finx |
53.1% | 589 | 51 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 5 | Shade |
51.9% | 775 | 55 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Janet |
51.4% | 897 | 57 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 5 | Leon |
49.2% | 6120 | 86 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
48.1% | 7847 | 89 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 3 | Moe |
50.5% | 564 | 50 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Amber |
50.1% | 729 | 54 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 3 | Fang |
47.9% | 4959 | 82 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Carl |
48.2% | 2679 | 73 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 1 | Chuck |
50.2% | 486 | 48 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▲ 5 | Chester |
48.8% | 1027 | 59 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 5 | Draco |
52.2% | 186 | 33 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▲ 1 | Willow |
49.3% | 613 | 51 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 3 | Sam |
49.4% | 314 | 41 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 3 | Colt |
45.4% | 14279 | 98 | 3.8% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 2 | Bonnie |
46.7% | 1580 | 65 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 2 | Penny |
46.2% | 2488 | 72 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 1 | Meg |
45.1% | 3200 | 76 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 1 | Charlie |
45.5% | 1023 | 59 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 4 | Kenji |
44.4% | 1981 | 69 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 9 | Ollie |
45.3% | 530 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 10 | Hank |
45.4% | 339 | 42 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Tick |
43.4% | 7196 | 88 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 3 | Otis |
44.0% | 1950 | 69 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 3 | Grom |
43.6% | 3253 | 76 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 3 | Trunk |
44.9% | 267 | 39 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
44.0% | 1158 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Griff |
43.1% | 3168 | 76 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 4 | Larry & Lawrie |
42.8% | 1075 | 60 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 2 | Eve |
42.8% | 1064 | 59 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Surge |
42.0% | 3808 | 79 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 1 | Mr. P |
41.9% | 1581 | 65 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Rico |
41.2% | 4976 | 83 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Lily |
41.4% | 2138 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Squeak |
40.1% | 3260 | 76 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 1 | Spike |
39.9% | 3193 | 76 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 1 | Crow |
39.4% | 4562 | 81 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 3 | Edgar |
38.6% | 9783 | 93 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Rosa |
38.8% | 1054 | 59 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 2 | Maisie |
38.6% | 1191 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 1 | Colette |
38.3% | 2577 | 73 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Dynamike |
37.9% | 4546 | 81 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Tara |
37.1% | 946 | 58 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
36.9% | 2138 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 5 | Nita |
36.7% | 1227 | 62 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 2 | Buster |
35.8% | 536 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
36.1% | 723 | 54 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 3 | Jessie |
36.3% | 1866 | 68 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 2 | Gale |
35.9% | 999 | 59 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 2 | Bibi |
36.0% | 1535 | 65 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 2 | Darryl |
35.5% | 1206 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 4 | Ash |
34.9% | 628 | 52 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 4 | Barley |
35.1% | 1433 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 1 | Buzz |
34.9% | 1340 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
34.5% | 1402 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 1 | Emz |
34.4% | 3315 | 76 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 3 | Berry |
33.0% | 961 | 58 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 2 | Cordelius |
32.8% | 992 | 58 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Bull |
32.7% | 1503 | 65 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 2 | Clancy |
31.1% | 611 | 51 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
31.4% | 1147 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 1 | Sandy |
30.5% | 817 | 55 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Frank |
30.9% | 1473 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Jacky |
28.4% | 763 | 54 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Shelly |
27.5% | 2035 | 69 | 0.5% | Rather not |