
Heist
94,121 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 48 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 79 s out of 79–99 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 3,286 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 506 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 3,286 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 506 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (27 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Nori |
68.4% | 40521 | 100 | 7.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Mico |
62.2% | 14739 | 99 | 2.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▲ 3 | Bolt |
63.3% | 3617 | 78 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 3 | Lumi |
63.1% | 3857 | 79 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Gigi |
63.7% | 2362 | 71 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 2 | Kaze |
61.6% | 15042 | 99 | 2.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 2 | Starr Nova |
61.7% | 4104 | 80 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Chuck |
60.3% | 29818 | 100 | 4.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 6 | Wendy |
63.5% | 1291 | 62 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 3 | R-T |
62.5% | 1562 | 65 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
60.4% | 3624 | 78 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 5 | Trunk |
61.7% | 1453 | 64 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Doug |
61.5% | 1445 | 64 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 1 | Shade |
59.8% | 3910 | 79 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 1 | Pierce |
60.3% | 2364 | 71 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 4 | Glowy |
60.3% | 1111 | 60 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 6 | Draco |
59.1% | 1531 | 65 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Amber |
56.8% | 3204 | 76 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 8 | 8-Bit |
55.4% | 27249 | 100 | 4.7% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 9 | Ziggy |
59.2% | 818 | 56 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 9 | Hank |
58.1% | 1146 | 61 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 8 | Sprout |
57.2% | 1691 | 66 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 12 | Bo |
56.2% | 3698 | 78 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Ruffs |
58.4% | 942 | 58 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 8 | Sam |
58.7% | 808 | 55 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 4 | Mandy |
54.8% | 10765 | 94 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▲ 5 | Chester |
56.4% | 1640 | 66 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▼ 12 | Griff |
53.9% | 14385 | 98 | 2.7% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▲ 8 | Najia |
57.9% | 693 | 53 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▼ 5 | Juju |
58.0% | 598 | 51 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▼ 10 | Nita |
53.4% | 21227 | 100 | 3.7% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▼ 13 | Damian |
57.0% | 681 | 53 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▲ 13 | Nani |
54.1% | 1738 | 67 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▲ 4 | Finx |
56.9% | 489 | 48 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 7 | Lola |
54.0% | 1374 | 63 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 10 | Berry |
52.0% | 11417 | 95 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 17 | Stu |
54.4% | 993 | 58 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 5 | Moe |
54.5% | 798 | 55 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 12 | Melodie |
51.3% | 11238 | 95 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 1 | Penny |
50.8% | 13204 | 97 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 3 | Kit |
52.5% | 1605 | 66 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 14 | Bull |
50.5% | 15358 | 99 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 4 | Willow |
52.8% | 846 | 56 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 7 | Mina |
53.0% | 610 | 51 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 12 | Jae-Yong |
54.4% | 355 | 43 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 5 | Carl |
49.5% | 6804 | 87 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 2 | Alli |
52.1% | 653 | 52 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 13 | Jessie |
48.3% | 24330 | 100 | 4.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 13 | Emz |
48.4% | 11399 | 95 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 2 | Janet |
51.8% | 427 | 46 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 11 | Cordelius |
48.4% | 4797 | 82 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▲ 11 | Gray |
50.4% | 704 | 53 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 8 | Bibi |
47.4% | 8783 | 91 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▲ 7 | Meeple |
49.8% | 630 | 52 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▲ 10 | Gus |
49.4% | 790 | 55 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 6 | Rico |
46.7% | 19569 | 100 | 3.8% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▲ 12 | Angelo |
49.3% | 578 | 50 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▼ 10 | Edgar |
46.4% | 21671 | 100 | 4.1% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▲ 8 | Mortis |
46.3% | 1774 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 5 | Colt |
44.5% | 22115 | 100 | 4.1% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
44.7% | 6806 | 87 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 6 | Colette |
44.4% | 12596 | 96 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 10 | Brock |
44.1% | 15929 | 100 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 5 | Dynamike |
42.8% | 9903 | 93 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
43.2% | 4009 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 4 | Pearl |
42.9% | 1952 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 9 | Buzz |
42.1% | 3698 | 78 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 2 | Lily |
40.6% | 3193 | 76 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Meg |
40.0% | 4116 | 80 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 1 | Surge |
39.7% | 3842 | 79 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 5 | Pam |
39.0% | 1562 | 65 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 3 | Ash |
38.8% | 1988 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 8 | Larry & Lawrie |
38.7% | 2784 | 74 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 6 | Crow |
38.3% | 8533 | 91 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 2 | Frank |
38.4% | 5068 | 83 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 2 | Otis |
38.3% | 3439 | 77 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 5 | Squeak |
37.7% | 3233 | 76 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 8 | Clancy |
37.4% | 2697 | 73 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Kenji |
36.9% | 3106 | 75 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 3 | Spike |
36.6% | 4753 | 82 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 5 | El Primo |
36.1% | 5030 | 83 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 2 | Gale |
35.2% | 1663 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 2 | Rosa |
34.2% | 2231 | 71 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 5 | Piper |
34.0% | 3489 | 77 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 6 | Tara |
33.9% | 2109 | 70 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 4 | Charlie |
33.9% | 1673 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 12 | Jacky |
33.8% | 1620 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 5 | Fang |
33.6% | 2601 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 9 | Tick |
32.7% | 4146 | 80 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 7 | Max |
32.1% | 2582 | 73 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 3 | Grom |
31.5% | 2092 | 70 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 2 | Shelly |
31.4% | 4445 | 81 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 2 | Belle |
30.6% | 1980 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 2 | Leon |
30.6% | 2590 | 73 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 8 | Poco |
30.1% | 2510 | 72 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 4 | Lou |
29.7% | 1874 | 68 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 4 | Byron |
29.8% | 2899 | 74 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 4 | Bea |
29.5% | 1804 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Mr. P |
29.4% | 1642 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 13 | Buster |
27.9% | 919 | 57 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 7 | Maisie |
28.6% | 1716 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 7 | Ollie |
25.1% | 506 | 48 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 10 | Eve |
27.4% | 1277 | 62 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Bonnie |
26.7% | 1662 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Sandy |
23.0% | 1340 | 63 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
19.0% | 1064 | 59 | 0.2% | Rather not |