
Hot Zone
82,600 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 49 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,606 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 669 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,606 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 669 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (71 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
76.8% | 14104 | 98 | 2.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Bolt |
71.5% | 7496 | 89 | 1.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
68.5% | 12727 | 97 | 2.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
69.5% | 2548 | 73 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▼ 1 | Starr Nova |
68.0% | 6071 | 86 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 2 | Glowy |
66.0% | 3986 | 79 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 3 | Doug |
65.7% | 2635 | 73 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Draco |
65.7% | 2259 | 71 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 3 | Chuck |
63.7% | 5898 | 85 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 1 | Finx |
63.2% | 3616 | 78 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Bo |
61.3% | 15348 | 99 | 2.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 12 | Trunk |
62.9% | 1509 | 65 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 5 | Chester |
60.1% | 2792 | 74 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | – | Mina |
59.1% | 3809 | 79 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 12 | Hank |
61.1% | 1253 | 62 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 4 | Amber |
59.1% | 3164 | 76 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
58.7% | 3916 | 79 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
59.2% | 2284 | 71 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 4 | Gray |
58.8% | 2970 | 75 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 7 | Pierce |
57.7% | 8846 | 91 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 7 | Sprout |
59.2% | 2029 | 69 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 10 | Lumi |
58.3% | 3825 | 79 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 15 | Jae-Yong |
59.9% | 1130 | 60 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 3 | R-T |
60.6% | 876 | 57 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 4 | Sirius |
58.1% | 2724 | 74 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 11 | Griff |
56.0% | 13953 | 98 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 10 | Meg |
56.1% | 10493 | 94 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 12 | Juju |
59.8% | 724 | 54 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▼ 4 | Ruffs |
57.8% | 1498 | 65 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▲ 5 | Ziggy |
57.7% | 1569 | 65 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▼ 9 | Gigi |
57.4% | 1256 | 62 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▲ 12 | Lola |
57.2% | 1313 | 63 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▲ 9 | Sam |
58.1% | 685 | 53 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▲ 2 | Janet |
57.1% | 799 | 55 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | ▼ 4 | Poco |
53.6% | 13539 | 98 | 3.3% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | ▼ 3 | Lou |
53.4% | 9277 | 92 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 6 | Najia |
55.0% | 1627 | 66 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 6 | Moe |
55.7% | 1095 | 60 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 9 | Meeple |
54.9% | 1426 | 64 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 9 | Pam |
53.4% | 4732 | 82 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 18 | Shade |
54.6% | 1023 | 59 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 3 | Mortis |
52.1% | 6171 | 86 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 17 | 8-Bit |
51.5% | 15609 | 100 | 3.0% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 3 | Emz |
51.2% | 16549 | 100 | 3.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 6 | Jessie |
50.5% | 10560 | 94 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 5 | Mico |
53.8% | 624 | 51 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 18 | Gus |
51.5% | 1475 | 64 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 17 | Sandy |
50.3% | 4614 | 81 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 15 | Kenji |
49.4% | 7731 | 89 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 3 | Fang |
48.9% | 8283 | 90 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 13 | Kit |
50.1% | 1108 | 60 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▲ 16 | Mandy |
49.3% | 1964 | 69 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 16 | Ash |
49.0% | 2966 | 75 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▼ 4 | Tick |
47.9% | 22869 | 100 | 4.6% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
49.0% | 1273 | 62 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 4 | Penny |
47.2% | 10660 | 94 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 57 | – | Berry |
46.8% | 7312 | 88 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 3 | Alli |
49.5% | 467 | 47 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 16 | Willow |
47.2% | 816 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 6 | Pearl |
45.9% | 3350 | 77 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 5 | Belle |
45.5% | 2522 | 72 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 1 | Frank |
44.9% | 6523 | 87 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 5 | Nita |
44.7% | 5652 | 84 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 2 | Tara |
44.9% | 3701 | 78 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 25 | Angelo |
46.2% | 595 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 3 | Gale |
44.6% | 3988 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 7 | Bibi |
44.3% | 5727 | 85 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 22 | Clancy |
44.4% | 3420 | 77 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 16 | Max |
43.8% | 4483 | 81 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 2 | Spike |
42.9% | 6746 | 87 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
42.8% | 5378 | 84 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 2 | Barley |
42.6% | 6424 | 86 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 2 | Carl |
41.5% | 4140 | 80 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 4 | Surge |
40.9% | 6609 | 87 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 8 | Melodie |
40.8% | 2267 | 71 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 2 | Crow |
40.3% | 7898 | 89 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
40.7% | 2853 | 74 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
40.0% | 6055 | 85 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Brock |
39.8% | 8199 | 90 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 11 | Edgar |
39.6% | 12814 | 97 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
39.7% | 2614 | 73 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 9 | Bea |
39.1% | 3733 | 78 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 3 | Byron |
38.7% | 5713 | 85 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 12 | Rico |
37.7% | 5399 | 84 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 4 | Colt |
37.4% | 7330 | 88 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 5 | Rosa |
37.5% | 2680 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 11 | Buzz |
37.5% | 2178 | 70 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 5 | Maisie |
37.3% | 2131 | 70 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 9 | Mr. P |
37.0% | 2035 | 69 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 3 | Buster |
36.7% | 2208 | 70 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 11 | Dynamike |
36.2% | 7072 | 88 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 5 | Grom |
36.3% | 3246 | 76 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 8 | Bull |
36.2% | 3512 | 77 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Piper |
36.1% | 3957 | 79 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 9 | El Primo |
34.8% | 4392 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 4 | Jacky |
34.9% | 2529 | 72 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 9 | Eve |
33.2% | 1522 | 65 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 7 | Shelly |
32.9% | 4201 | 80 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 4 | Leon |
32.8% | 2586 | 73 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 16 | Ollie |
32.2% | 1107 | 60 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 14 | Charlie |
32.1% | 1897 | 68 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Lily |
31.9% | 1921 | 68 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 4 | Bonnie |
31.7% | 1632 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 4 | Cordelius |
31.4% | 1812 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 2 | Darryl |
30.6% | 3111 | 76 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
27.8% | 1863 | 68 | 0.4% | Rather not |