
Bounty
192,742 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 41 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,227 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 326 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,227 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 326 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (92 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
68.0% | 8596 | 91 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Wendy |
58.7% | 117471 | 100 | 2.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▲ 1 | Shade |
57.0% | 21113 | 100 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 1 | Tick |
56.3% | 65626 | 100 | 3.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 2 | Mina |
56.2% | 5243 | 83 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 1 | Meeple |
55.6% | 12281 | 96 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▼ 1 | Starr Nova |
55.5% | 14970 | 99 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 2 | Nori |
54.5% | 47661 | 100 | 4.5% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Mico |
54.5% | 10816 | 94 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 7 | Gigi |
55.4% | 2919 | 75 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 5 | Sprout |
54.2% | 7928 | 89 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 2 | Gray |
54.1% | 7583 | 89 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Juju |
55.1% | 2479 | 72 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 3 | Bo |
53.6% | 13400 | 97 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 6 | Brock |
53.0% | 47424 | 100 | 4.1% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | Doug |
54.2% | 3712 | 78 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 5 | Ruffs |
54.7% | 2158 | 70 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 6 | Mortis |
52.9% | 26387 | 100 | 3.7% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 17 | R-T |
55.0% | 1259 | 62 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 3 | Kaze |
53.1% | 5280 | 83 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 5 | Pierce |
52.7% | 8488 | 91 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 4 | Penny |
52.2% | 13478 | 97 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▼ 4 | Edgar |
51.5% | 112936 | 100 | 5.4% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 3 | Carl |
52.4% | 7267 | 88 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Najia |
52.1% | 7515 | 89 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
52.6% | 3658 | 78 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 7 | Lily |
51.5% | 21720 | 100 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 6 | Alli |
52.0% | 5803 | 85 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 29 | – | Willow |
51.9% | 3833 | 79 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 3 | Ziggy |
52.0% | 3112 | 76 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 7 | Surge |
50.6% | 26260 | 100 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Mandy |
50.7% | 13693 | 98 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 5 | Janet |
52.2% | 1576 | 65 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 4 | Grom |
50.0% | 15126 | 99 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 5 | Chester |
50.3% | 6203 | 86 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 4 | Griff |
49.7% | 24995 | 100 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 2 | Kit |
49.8% | 11777 | 95 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 10 | Mr. P |
50.1% | 4640 | 81 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 5 | Stu |
50.1% | 4761 | 82 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 2 | Lumi |
50.8% | 2086 | 70 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 15 | Jae-Yong |
52.4% | 670 | 53 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 3 | Ash |
49.9% | 2500 | 72 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 7 | Trunk |
50.4% | 1498 | 65 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 7 | Dynamike |
48.3% | 32118 | 100 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 4 | Pearl |
49.0% | 4360 | 81 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 15 | Chuck |
50.1% | 969 | 58 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 1 | Sirius |
47.9% | 8577 | 91 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 5 | Bibi |
47.6% | 11719 | 95 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 5 | Finx |
49.5% | 1006 | 59 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 5 | Moe |
48.8% | 1385 | 63 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 4 | Rico |
46.9% | 26409 | 100 | 2.8% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 6 | Emz |
46.9% | 27027 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 4 | Leon |
46.5% | 16324 | 100 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▲ 8 | Hank |
47.6% | 1786 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 3 | Spike |
46.1% | 17781 | 100 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 24 | Sam |
47.9% | 889 | 57 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 6 | Larry & Lawrie |
46.3% | 4484 | 81 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 3 | Squeak |
45.5% | 14288 | 98 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | 8-Bit |
45.5% | 11895 | 96 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 3 | Fang |
45.5% | 9861 | 93 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 1 | Kenji |
45.4% | 10503 | 94 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 4 | Gus |
45.7% | 4149 | 80 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 4 | Angelo |
46.3% | 1524 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 6 | Cordelius |
45.3% | 6747 | 87 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 2 | Max |
44.8% | 6219 | 86 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 3 | Nani |
45.0% | 3503 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 10 | Draco |
45.6% | 669 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 6 | Glowy |
45.1% | 922 | 57 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 16 | Buster |
44.5% | 1247 | 62 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 5 | Otis |
43.5% | 5801 | 85 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 1 | Gene |
43.5% | 4203 | 80 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 4 | Jessie |
43.2% | 7219 | 88 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 6 | Amber |
43.4% | 2499 | 72 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 7 | Lola |
43.7% | 1237 | 62 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 4 | Buzz |
42.2% | 5696 | 85 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 6 | Barley |
42.1% | 5856 | 85 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 1 | Byron |
41.9% | 10741 | 94 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 2 | Crow |
41.6% | 17726 | 100 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 4 | Piper |
41.2% | 18801 | 100 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 7 | Belle |
41.5% | 4852 | 82 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 1 | Bull |
40.3% | 6905 | 87 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 1 | Rosa |
40.4% | 2859 | 74 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 2 | Meg |
39.8% | 5464 | 84 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 2 | Nita |
39.6% | 5308 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 3 | Darryl |
38.8% | 4584 | 81 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 3 | Colt |
38.3% | 18115 | 100 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 3 | Maisie |
38.8% | 2706 | 73 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 2 | Frank |
38.4% | 7135 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 2 | Bea |
38.1% | 6691 | 87 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
38.2% | 4847 | 82 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 3 | Eve |
38.1% | 1636 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 3 | Tara |
37.8% | 4358 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Gale |
37.4% | 4014 | 79 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 30 | Ollie |
36.9% | 1003 | 59 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 3 | Bonnie |
36.6% | 2022 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Sandy |
36.1% | 2896 | 74 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 3 | Berry |
35.4% | 4514 | 81 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Shelly |
35.2% | 8009 | 90 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
35.2% | 2801 | 74 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Colette |
34.9% | 7332 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Jacky |
34.9% | 2447 | 72 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Clancy |
33.7% | 1840 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
32.4% | 4619 | 81 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 1 | Charlie |
32.2% | 2127 | 70 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▲ 1 | Pam |
31.5% | 1503 | 65 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
27.0% | 1824 | 68 | 0.4% | Rather not |