My roster

Enter your player tag and the site hides everything you cannot play anyway: brawlers you are missing, and those below power 9 — below 11 from Mythic upwards. The tag goes to the official API once and then stays in your browser. It is neither stored nor logged here, and there is no account.

You can find your tag in the game, under your name in your profile.

EN
Brawl Ball

No Good Deed

55,588 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 40 of 105 brawlers above 50%.

Trophy Road
No Good DeedBrawl Ball

Recommendation

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean
Strong pick Good pick SolidThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Brawl Ball): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.
TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.
Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 7,142 real line-ups.

1
80.8% expected
2
80.8% expected
3
80.8% expected
4
80.8% expected
5
80.7% expected
6
80.7% expected
How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 7,142 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (315 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#BrawlerWin rateGamesTrustPick rateRating
1 Bibi 63.1%
14453 98
4.4% Strong pick
2 Emz 61.1%
5744 85
1.5% Good pick
3 Frank 60.0%
9865 93
3.3% Good pick
4 Edgar 59.5%
10712 94
3.4% Good pick
5 Griff 59.2%
6561 87
1.7% Good pick
6 Spike 57.7%
4470 81
1.4% Solid
7 Clancy 57.1%
2667 73
0.6% Solid
8▲ 1 Damian 56.5%
4371 81
0.9% Solid
9▼ 1 Sirius 56.4%
2849 74
0.7% Solid
10 Kenji 55.6%
4840 82
0.9% Solid
11 Gale 55.6%
4124 80
1.6% Solid
12▲ 1 Surge 53.9%
6863 87
1.0% Solid
13▼ 1 Tara 54.2%
3572 78
1.4% Solid
14▲ 3 Hank 54.0%
2632 73
0.8% Solid
15▼ 1 Melodie 53.9%
2672 73
0.4% Solid
16▼ 1 Ash 53.7%
2917 75
0.5% Solid
17▼ 1 Max 53.3%
4082 80
1.2% Solid
18 Bull 52.3%
11518 95
2.0% Rather not
19▲ 1 Jacky 52.5%
4879 82
2.3% Rather not
20▼ 1 Dynamike 52.3%
5773 85
1.3% Rather not
21▲ 1 Fang 51.9%
4672 82
0.9% Rather not
22▼ 1 Buzz 51.8%
5019 83
0.9% Rather not
23 Nita 51.6%
6758 87
1.7% Rather not
24▲ 1 Sam 52.1%
2506 72
0.8% Rather not
25▼ 1 Darryl 51.2%
6304 86
1.6% Rather not
26 Draco 52.0%
1856 68
0.5% Rather not
27▲ 1 Cordelius 51.3%
3659 78
0.8% Rather not
28▲ 6 Doug 51.2%
3502 77
0.7% Rather not
29▲ 2 El Primo 50.5%
9450 92
2.3% Rather not
30▼ 3 Trunk 51.4%
2697 73
0.9% Rather not
31▲ 1 Shade 51.1%
3900 79
1.5% Rather not
32▼ 2 Ollie 52.1%
1327 63
0.3% Rather not
33▲ 2 Crow 51.0%
3272 76
1.0% Rather not
34▲ 2 Rico 50.0%
7354 88
1.7% Rather not
35▼ 2 Pearl 51.0%
2209 70
0.7% Rather not
36▼ 7 Starr Nova 50.7%
2982 75
0.7% Rather not
37▲ 5 Nori 50.9%
1839 68
0.6% Rather not
38▼ 1 Jae-Yong 51.7%
1013 59
0.3% Rather not
39 Chester 49.9%
4527 81
1.3% Rather not
40▼ 2 Maisie 50.1%
2772 74
0.6% Rather not
41 Colette 49.7%
4221 80
1.2% Rather not
42▼ 2 Larry & Lawrie 50.3%
1959 69
0.8% Rather not
43 Mortis 48.7%
8049 90
1.9% Rather not
44▲ 2 Wendy 74.4%
39 10
4.0% Rather not
45 Lumi 49.5%
1745 67
0.5% Rather not
46▼ 2 Shelly 48.2%
9669 92
2.8% Rather not
47 Lou 49.2%
1826 68
0.5% Rather not
48▲ 2 Bo 48.8%
2318 71
1.2% Rather not
49▲ 4 Carl 48.5%
3414 77
1.1% Rather not
50▼ 2 Moe 49.1%
1464 64
0.6% Rather not
51▼ 2 Buster 48.9%
1721 67
0.2% Rather not
52▲ 3 Mina 48.4%
2376 71
0.7% Rather not
53▼ 2 Otis 48.2%
2182 70
0.2% Rather not
54 Tick 48.0%
2271 71
0.7% Rather not
55▲ 2 Kit 47.5%
2584 73
0.3% Rather not
56▲ 2 Willow 47.4%
2359 71
0.8% Rather not
57▲ 5 Gigi 47.8%
1340 63
0.4% Rather not
58▼ 2 Squeak 47.4%
1970 69
0.7% Rather not
59 R-T 47.6%
1186 61
0.2% Rather not
60▼ 8 Charlie 47.4%
1229 62
0.3% Rather not
61▲ 2 Berry 47.0%
1637 66
0.7% Rather not
62▼ 1 Stu 46.2%
4945 82
1.2% Rather not
63▼ 3 Leon 46.4%
2631 73
0.5% Rather not
64▲ 2 Jessie 46.1%
2556 73
0.7% Rather not
65▲ 3 Meg 45.9%
2780 74
0.5% Rather not
66▼ 1 Bolt 46.2%
1823 68
1.0% Rather not
67▲ 4 Juju 46.5%
895 57
0.4% Rather not
68▲ 2 Pierce 46.0%
1088 60
0.3% Rather not
69▲ 3 Amber 45.6%
1804 67
0.4% Rather not
70▼ 6 Sprout 45.7%
1352 63
0.7% Rather not
71▼ 4 Sandy 45.2%
1777 67
0.2% Rather not
72▼ 3 Ziggy 44.8%
805 55
0.3% Rather not
73▲ 6 Finx 43.8%
1090 60
0.3% Rather not
74▼ 1 Lily 43.2%
1803 67
0.4% Rather not
75▲ 2 Ruffs 43.3%
1452 64
0.5% Rather not
76 Kaze 43.0%
2110 70
0.1% Rather not
77▼ 3 Colt 42.3%
6259 86
2.0% Rather not
78▼ 3 Glowy 42.8%
955 58
0.2% Rather not
79▼ 1 Mico 41.0%
1184 61
0.5% Rather not
80 Meeple 40.7%
1504 65
0.3% Rather not
81 Alli 40.5%
1298 62
0.6% Rather not
82 Rosa 39.6%
4159 80
1.8% Rather not
83 Lola 39.9%
1522 65
1.1% Rather not
84 Bea 38.9%
1943 68
0.8% Rather not
85 Grom 38.4%
1562 65
0.2% Rather not
86▲ 1 8-Bit 37.2%
2292 71
0.7% Rather not
87▼ 1 Brock 37.0%
4300 80
1.0% Rather not
88▲ 3 Eve 36.8%
885 57
0.3% Rather not
89 Pam 36.9%
1799 67
0.9% Rather not
90▼ 2 Penny 36.3%
1951 69
0.6% Rather not
91▼ 1 Poco 35.9%
3997 79
1.0% Rather not
92▲ 7 Janet 35.0%
794 55
0.6% Rather not
93▼ 1 Bonnie 35.3%
1424 64
0.8% Rather not
94▲ 1 Byron 34.8%
1340 63
0.3% Rather not
95▼ 2 Nani 34.8%
1969 69
0.3% Rather not
96 Belle 33.9%
1065 59
0.3% Rather not
97 Gray 34.0%
1225 62
0.1% Rather not
98▼ 4 Najia 33.4%
709 53
0.2% Rather not
99▼ 1 Mandy 33.7%
1467 64
0.7% Rather not
100 Mr. P 33.4%
1341 63
0.6% Rather not
101▲ 1 Barley 32.5%
3118 76
1.5% Rather not
102▼ 1 Gus 32.3%
1766 67
0.9% Rather not
103 Gene 28.8%
1290 62
0.9% Rather not
104▲ 1 Chuck 25.1%
784 55
0.5% Rather not
105▲ 1 Angelo 24.8%
774 55
0.6% Rather not
106▼ 2 Piper 25.8%
1200 61
0.2% Rather not