Brawl Ball

Nutmeg

345,130 battles collected on this map.

OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 76 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 15555 games

Controller 5376 games

Controller 12991 games

Damage Dealer 10768 games

Damage Dealer 8082 games

Controller 9815 games

Damage Dealer 11891 games

Controller 8410 games

Damage Dealer 4188 games

Damage Dealer 20453 games

Controller 6336 games

Controller 11377 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Brawl Ball): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Jae-Yong 64.5%Winrate 4,031 games

Gigi 63.4%Winrate 9,570 games

Charlie 63.0%Winrate 5,376 games

Trunk 62.5%Winrate 7,336 games

Overrated

Edgar 33.2%Winrate 119,034 games

Colt 36.8%Winrate 83,544 games

Rico 37.5%Winrate 74,766 games

Bibi 46.1%Winrate 73,400 games

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 6,033 real line-ups.

78.1% expected

78.1% expected

78.1% expected

78.1% expected

78.0% expected

78.0% expected

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 6,033 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (67 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	73.8%	32831	100	1.5%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	68.7%	21207	100	1.1%	Strong pick
3	–	Nori	65.9%	93251	100	4.1%	Strong pick
4	–	Damian	66.3%	17638	100	0.7%	Strong pick
5	–	Starr Nova	65.2%	37687	100	1.7%	Strong pick
6	–	Ash	65.6%	12065	96	0.7%	Strong pick
7	–	Jae-Yong	64.5%	4031	79	0.2%	Strong pick
8	–	Gigi	63.4%	9570	92	0.4%	Strong pick
9	–	Lumi	62.5%	15555	100	0.7%	Strong pick
10	–	Charlie	63.0%	5376	84	0.2%	Strong pick
11	–	Otis	62.2%	12991	97	0.6%	Strong pick
12	–	Trunk	62.5%	7336	88	0.4%	Strong pick
13	–	Moe	61.9%	10768	94	0.4%	Strong pick
14	▲ 1	Doug	61.7%	9709	93	0.5%	Strong pick
15	▼ 1	Pearl	61.9%	8082	90	0.4%	Strong pick
16	–	Ollie	62.0%	4118	80	0.2%	Strong pick
17	–	Sirius	61.0%	11815	95	0.5%	Strong pick
18	–	Lou	61.0%	9815	93	0.4%	Strong pick
19	–	Clancy	60.6%	11891	96	0.5%	Good pick
20	–	Sandy	60.8%	8410	90	0.4%	Good pick
21	–	Kaze	60.3%	14621	99	0.7%	Good pick
22	–	Buster	61.0%	4789	82	0.2%	Good pick
23	–	Shade	59.8%	17730	100	1.0%	Good pick
24	–	R-T	60.8%	4188	80	0.2%	Good pick
25	–	Draco	60.2%	6288	86	0.3%	Good pick
26	–	Pierce	59.2%	15988	100	0.7%	Good pick
27	–	Meg	58.9%	27408	100	1.4%	Good pick
28	–	Chester	59.0%	20453	100	0.9%	Good pick
29	▲ 2	Alli	59.8%	5133	83	0.2%	Good pick
30	▼ 1	Finx	59.8%	4783	82	0.2%	Good pick
31	▼ 1	Mina	58.7%	24252	100	1.2%	Good pick
32	–	Ziggy	59.5%	4862	82	0.2%	Good pick
33	–	Sam	59.0%	6494	87	0.3%	Good pick
34	–	Glowy	59.4%	4310	80	0.2%	Good pick
35	–	Melodie	58.0%	18144	100	0.9%	Good pick
36	▲ 1	Amber	58.5%	6336	86	0.3%	Good pick
37	▼ 1	Ruffs	58.5%	6515	87	0.3%	Good pick
38	–	Cordelius	57.8%	14145	98	0.6%	Good pick
39	–	Gale	57.3%	11377	95	0.5%	Good pick
40	–	Gray	57.1%	11888	96	0.5%	Solid
41	▲ 1	Willow	57.1%	7026	88	0.3%	Solid
42	▼ 1	Meeple	56.9%	9500	92	0.4%	Solid
43	–	Maisie	56.8%	8562	91	0.4%	Solid
44	–	Bo	56.4%	12566	96	0.6%	Solid
45	–	Tara	56.2%	12630	96	0.6%	Solid
46	–	Stu	55.8%	35370	100	1.8%	Solid
47	–	Kit	56.0%	11192	95	0.5%	Solid
48	▲ 1	Hank	56.1%	5931	85	0.3%	Solid
49	▼ 1	Najia	56.4%	4278	80	0.2%	Solid
50	–	Sprout	55.7%	9696	93	0.4%	Solid
51	–	Berry	55.7%	6924	87	0.3%	Solid
52	▲ 2	Mico	56.0%	3617	78	0.2%	Solid
53	–	Griff	54.5%	64178	100	3.2%	Solid
54	▼ 2	Lily	55.2%	7576	89	0.3%	Solid
55	▲ 1	Squeak	55.2%	7699	89	0.4%	Solid
56	▼ 1	Buzz	54.7%	18433	100	0.8%	Solid
57	–	Larry & Lawrie	55.2%	5162	83	0.2%	Solid
58	–	Janet	55.0%	3073	75	0.1%	Solid
59	–	Juju	55.3%	2226	70	0.1%	Solid
60	▲ 1	Lola	54.7%	3605	78	0.2%	Solid
61	▼ 1	Carl	53.3%	17600	100	0.9%	Solid
62	–	Max	52.9%	34493	100	1.7%	Solid
63	–	Eve	54.4%	2219	70	0.1%	Solid
64	▲ 1	Byron	53.1%	8928	91	0.4%	Solid
65	▼ 1	Pam	53.6%	3829	79	0.2%	Solid
66	–	Fang	52.1%	36574	100	1.7%	Solid
67	–	Jacky	52.4%	9828	93	0.5%	Solid
68	–	Gene	53.0%	3011	75	0.1%	Rather not
69	–	Bea	52.1%	8322	90	0.4%	Rather not
70	▲ 1	Spike	51.3%	22560	100	1.0%	Rather not
71	▼ 1	Kenji	51.0%	44811	100	1.9%	Rather not
72	–	Belle	52.2%	3345	77	0.2%	Rather not
73	–	Bonnie	52.0%	3047	75	0.1%	Rather not
74	▲ 1	Gus	51.1%	5664	84	0.3%	Rather not
75	▼ 1	Mr. P	51.4%	2915	75	0.1%	Rather not
76	–	Mortis	49.6%	87223	100	4.3%	Rather not
77	▲ 1	Grom	50.6%	4079	80	0.2%	Rather not
78	▼ 1	Tick	49.8%	14900	99	0.7%	Rather not
79	–	Bull	49.3%	34113	100	1.6%	Rather not
80	–	Mandy	49.7%	7898	89	0.3%	Rather not
81	▲ 1	Darryl	48.6%	19218	100	1.0%	Rather not
82	▼ 1	Brock	48.3%	32482	100	1.4%	Rather not
83	▲ 1	Chuck	50.0%	1885	68	0.1%	Rather not
84	▼ 1	Penny	48.6%	8072	90	0.4%	Rather not
85	–	Poco	48.1%	18209	100	0.8%	Rather not
86	▲ 1	Nani	48.5%	4231	80	0.2%	Rather not
87	▲ 1	Colette	47.7%	19932	100	0.9%	Rather not
88	▼ 2	Jessie	47.9%	11099	95	0.5%	Rather not
89	–	Leon	47.4%	13933	98	0.6%	Rather not
90	–	Piper	47.4%	7205	88	0.3%	Rather not
91	–	Bibi	46.1%	73400	100	3.7%	Rather not
92	–	Rosa	46.1%	7050	88	0.3%	Rather not
93	–	Emz	44.3%	37155	100	2.0%	Rather not
94	–	Surge	43.8%	78879	100	3.7%	Rather not
95	–	Barley	43.4%	8575	91	0.4%	Rather not
96	–	Crow	42.9%	30330	100	1.4%	Rather not
97	▲ 1	8-Bit	42.8%	22878	100	1.1%	Rather not
98	▼ 1	Dynamike	42.2%	40565	100	1.8%	Rather not
99	–	Frank	41.7%	45800	100	2.4%	Rather not
100	–	Angelo	42.5%	1477	64	0.1%	Rather not
101	–	Rico	37.5%	74766	100	3.9%	Rather not
102	–	Colt	36.8%	83544	100	4.3%	Rather not
103	–	El Primo	35.3%	39792	100	2.4%	Rather not
104	–	Edgar	33.2%	119034	100	6.9%	Rather not
105	–	Nita	31.0%	38414	100	2.1%	Rather not
106	–	Shelly	25.1%	64402	100	3.6%	Rather not