
Hot Zone
30,365 battles collected on this map.
MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 50 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 8,738 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 886 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 8,738 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 886 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (441 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
70.7% | 2747 | 74 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Trunk |
69.9% | 2960 | 75 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
66.3% | 8579 | 91 | 4.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | R-T |
67.7% | 2191 | 70 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Juju |
64.4% | 3901 | 79 | 2.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Doug |
64.0% | 5229 | 83 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Sirius |
64.0% | 2394 | 72 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Starr Nova |
63.9% | 2075 | 69 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Hank |
63.3% | 2840 | 74 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Shade |
61.1% | 6100 | 86 | 3.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Damian |
62.3% | 1014 | 59 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 1 | Willow |
61.5% | 1307 | 63 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Gigi |
62.2% | 841 | 56 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 2 | Ziggy |
62.1% | 815 | 55 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Meeple |
60.3% | 1436 | 64 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 1 | Bolt |
61.4% | 800 | 55 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
61.0% | 882 | 57 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Lumi |
59.8% | 984 | 58 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Mico |
57.3% | 2647 | 73 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 1 | Chuck |
57.9% | 1070 | 60 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Kaze |
57.1% | 1352 | 63 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Stu |
57.0% | 1326 | 63 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 1 | Finx |
60.6% | 414 | 45 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 1 | Kit |
56.5% | 1275 | 62 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Gray |
58.1% | 578 | 50 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 1 | Sam |
58.7% | 492 | 48 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
55.4% | 1508 | 65 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 1 | Chester |
56.0% | 805 | 55 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 2 | Kenji |
53.3% | 4952 | 82 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 2 | Ruffs |
57.3% | 490 | 48 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 2 | Bo |
54.4% | 1632 | 66 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Sprout |
56.1% | 688 | 53 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
53.5% | 2387 | 72 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Moe |
57.7% | 364 | 43 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Bibi |
51.9% | 5246 | 83 | 3.4% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 1 | Jacky |
52.6% | 2195 | 70 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 6 | Pierce |
54.8% | 598 | 51 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 2 | Mortis |
52.5% | 1824 | 68 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Amber |
54.1% | 660 | 52 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 2 | Surge |
51.1% | 5713 | 85 | 3.0% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 1 | Draco |
54.5% | 532 | 49 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
50.5% | 4144 | 80 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 1 | Alli |
53.7% | 467 | 47 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Najia |
54.6% | 339 | 42 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Buzz |
50.4% | 1701 | 66 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 1 | Glowy |
53.3% | 330 | 42 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
54.7% | 181 | 33 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Cordelius |
48.7% | 1619 | 66 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Berry |
47.9% | 3210 | 76 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 4 | Gus |
50.5% | 390 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▲ 1 | Lou |
48.2% | 1876 | 68 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 2 | Meg |
47.8% | 2982 | 75 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 1 | Nita |
47.7% | 2755 | 74 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
47.8% | 2030 | 69 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Angelo |
51.3% | 158 | 31 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 1 | Janet |
50.2% | 209 | 35 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 1 | Lola |
48.6% | 280 | 39 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 2 | Mandy |
47.9% | 351 | 43 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Edgar |
44.8% | 7066 | 88 | 3.9% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 2 | Nani |
46.7% | 353 | 43 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Dynamike |
44.1% | 4047 | 79 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Griff |
44.2% | 2880 | 74 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Tick |
43.2% | 5825 | 85 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | El Primo |
42.0% | 2314 | 71 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Squeak |
41.2% | 1787 | 67 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 4 | Lily |
41.1% | 1051 | 59 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 2 | Rosa |
40.9% | 1007 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 2 | Emz |
40.4% | 4302 | 80 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Carl |
40.6% | 1258 | 62 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 3 | Pearl |
40.6% | 831 | 56 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Rico |
39.5% | 1944 | 68 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Spike |
39.1% | 1827 | 68 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Penny |
39.0% | 2103 | 70 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Max |
38.5% | 917 | 57 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 1 | Melodie |
38.3% | 755 | 54 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Frank |
38.4% | 1950 | 69 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
38.2% | 899 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 2 | Belle |
37.5% | 437 | 46 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Shelly |
38.0% | 1853 | 68 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 1 | Sandy |
37.7% | 1004 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 2 | Tara |
37.7% | 1110 | 60 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 1 | 8-Bit |
37.6% | 2154 | 70 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Fang |
37.5% | 1292 | 62 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 2 | Brock |
37.4% | 2135 | 70 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Mr. P |
36.8% | 714 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Leon |
36.7% | 961 | 58 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Ollie |
35.3% | 357 | 43 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 2 | Eve |
35.1% | 478 | 47 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
35.4% | 826 | 56 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 1 | Gale |
35.5% | 1081 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Jessie |
35.4% | 2304 | 71 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Grom |
33.5% | 844 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Colette |
33.6% | 1046 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Maisie |
32.5% | 594 | 51 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Bonnie |
31.3% | 409 | 45 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 1 | Darryl |
32.9% | 1036 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
32.5% | 1792 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 2 | Buster |
30.5% | 541 | 49 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Colt |
31.6% | 1657 | 66 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Piper |
30.3% | 618 | 51 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 2 | Crow |
31.2% | 1709 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Clancy |
30.1% | 688 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 2 | Charlie |
29.0% | 487 | 48 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Bea |
29.7% | 735 | 54 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Byron |
27.8% | 841 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
23.1% | 506 | 48 | 0.3% | Rather not |