
Heist
106 battles collected on this map.
Short rounds Median 80 s out of 80–99 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
three-brawler line-ups that actually exist — counted across the whole mode.
This is for Heist as a whole, not for this map. There are not enough numbers here yet for a map-specific calculation — the calibration needs line-ups actually played on this map. As soon as enough accumulate, the calculation for Pit Stop appears in this spot; until then the mode-wide list is the best available answer.
Out of 784 line-ups with 120+ games.
What you see here. three-brawler line-ups that actually exist, counted across the whole mode — not for this map. There is no basis for a map-specific calculation yet: the calibration needs line-ups played on this map. The measured number is therefore not a prediction for Pit Stop, but the answer to what generally wins in Heist.
Measured · in the mode. The strongest three-brawler line-ups in this mode, out of 784 with at least 120 games. The number is deliberately cautious: unchecked, the luckiest outlier would sit on top. Per mode, not per map — on a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a number of its own.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Buzz |
71.1% | 45 | 12 | 7.1% | Solid | ||
| 2 | – | Rico |
68.3% | 41 | 11 | 6.4% | Solid | ||
| 3 | – | Kaze |
63.9% | 36 | 9 | 5.7% | Solid | ||
| 4 | ▼ 1 | Lumi |
65.2% | 23 | 2 | 3.6% | Rather not | ||
| 5 | ▲ 1 | Griff |
56.3% | 48 | 13 | 7.5% | Rather not | ||
| 6 | – | Meeple |
61.5% | 26 | 4 | 4.1% | Rather not | ||
| 7 | – | Edgar |
60.0% | 20 | 0 | 3.1% | Rather not | ||
| 8 | – | Shade |
58.8% | 17 | 0 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 9 | ▲ 2 | Bibi |
53.6% | 28 | 5 | 4.4% | Rather not | ||
| 10 | ▼ 1 | Mico |
48.4% | 31 | 7 | 4.9% | Rather not | ||
| 11 | NEW | Bull |
50.0% | 12 | 0 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 12 | ▼ 2 | Crow |
50.0% | 12 | 0 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
42.9% | 14 | 0 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Nita |
42.1% | 19 | 0 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Cordelius |
42.3% | 26 | 4 | 4.1% | Rather not | ||
| 16 | ▼ 2 | Ruffs |
38.9% | 18 | 0 | 2.8% | Rather not | ||
| 17 | ▼ 2 | Starr Nova |
35.7% | 14 | 0 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 18 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
33.3% | 12 | 0 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 19 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
35.3% | 17 | 0 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Surge |
34.8% | 23 | 2 | 3.6% | Rather not | ||
| 21 | – | Kit |
31.6% | 19 | 0 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 22 | ▼ 2 | 8-Bit |
23.1% | 13 | 0 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 23 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
32.1% | 28 | 5 | 4.4% | Rather not |