My roster

Enter your player tag and the site hides everything you cannot play anyway: brawlers you are missing, and those below power 9 — below 11 from Mythic upwards. The tag goes to the official API once and then stays in your browser. It is neither stored nor logged here, and there is no account.

You can find your tag in the game, under your name in your profile.

Brawl Ball

Pool Party

6,398 battles collected on this map.

Trophy Road
Pool PartyBrawl Ball

Recommendation

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean
Solid Rather notThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Brawl Ball): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.
TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.
Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 10,054 real line-ups.

1
80.2% expected
2
80.1% expected
3
80.1% expected
4
80.1% expected
5
80.0% expected
6
80.0% expected
How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 10,054 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (107 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#BrawlerWin rateGamesTrustPick rateRating
1 Bibi 57.5%
1599 66
2.3% Solid
2▲ 1 Emz 59.8%
594 51
1.6% Solid
3▼ 1 Frank 58.0%
981 58
3.2% Solid
4▲ 1 Edgar 55.7%
1210 61
3.4% Solid
5▼ 1 Griffpre-patch 56.9%
700 53
2.0% Solid
6 Dynamikepre-patch 55.7%
1009 59
1.6% Solid
7 Larry & Lawrie 59.9%
297 40
0.3% Solid
8 Hankpre-patch 57.5%
308 41
0.5% Rather not
9▲ 1 Tick 57.2%
299 40
1.0% Rather not
10▲ 3 Kenji 54.0%
567 50
1.2% Rather not
11▲ 3 Jackypre-patch 54.1%
540 49
1.6% Rather not
12▲ 5 Clancypre-patch 55.7%
334 42
0.9% Rather not
13▼ 1 Damianpre-patch 54.1%
525 49
0.5% Rather not
14▼ 3 Gale 54.6%
434 46
0.8% Rather not
15▼ 6 Bull 51.9%
1278 62
3.0% Rather not
16▼ 1 Surgepre-patch 52.2%
902 57
1.0% Rather not
17▲ 1 Sirius 53.9%
434 46
0.6% Rather not
18▲ 2 Maxpre-patch 53.1%
463 47
1.6% Rather not
19▲ 4 Shadepre-patch 52.4%
555 50
0.5% Rather not
20▼ 4 Sprout 57.1%
168 32
1.0% Rather not
21 Willow 53.5%
340 42
0.5% Rather not
22▲ 3 Tarapre-patch 53.1%
373 44
1.6% Rather not
23▲ 12 Melodiepre-patch 52.8%
322 42
0.4% Rather not
24▲ 2 Nitapre-patch 50.4%
734 54
2.1% Rather not
25▲ 2 Spike 50.8%
531 49
0.9% Rather not
26▲ 7 Stu 50.5%
616 51
1.2% Rather not
27▲ 1 Ricopre-patch 49.9%
777 55
1.7% Rather not
28▼ 4 Fang 50.6%
544 49
0.8% Rather not
29 Starr Novapre-patch 51.6%
335 42
0.5% Rather not
30▼ 8 Darryl 50.1%
651 52
1.7% Rather not
31▲ 6 Mr. P 54.2%
155 31
0.2% Rather not
32▲ 23 Juju 53.3%
165 32
0.1% Rather not
33▲ 3 R-T 55.3%
114 26
0.3% Rather not
34▼ 4 Busterpre-patch 52.5%
198 34
0.1% Rather not
35▼ 15 Maisiepre-patch 50.9%
332 42
0.9% Rather not
36▼ 4 Colettepre-patch 49.9%
493 48
0.9% Rather not
37▼ 3 Sandy 52.2%
209 35
0.2% Rather not
38▲ 6 Sam 51.5%
237 37
0.6% Rather not
39▲ 9 El Primopre-patch 48.2%
983 58
2.5% Rather not
40▼ 10 Doug 49.5%
420 46
1.1% Rather not
41 Otis 50.8%
238 37
0.5% Rather not
42 Charlie 52.6%
137 29
0.3% Rather not
43▼ 5 Ollie 52.6%
133 28
0.8% Rather not
44 Mortis 48.0%
992 58
2.3% Rather not
45▼ 5 Cordelius 48.9%
450 47
0.3% Rather not
46▲ 3 Pearl 50.0%
244 37
0.3% Rather not
47▲ 10 Ashpre-patch 49.5%
289 40
0.9% Rather not
48▼ 2 Grom 49.8%
225 36
0.4% Rather not
49▼ 10 Chester 48.2%
517 49
0.8% Rather not
50▼ 4 Moe 50.3%
165 32
0.4% Rather not
51▲ 20 Trunk 48.7%
271 39
0.8% Rather not
52▼ 1 Ziggypre-patch 50.4%
135 29
0.6% Rather not
53▲ 2 Lou 49.2%
195 34
0.3% Rather not
54▼ 3 Colt 47.1%
711 53
1.7% Rather not
55▼ 3 Carl 47.9%
363 43
1.2% Rather not
56▲ 2 Megpre-patch 47.6%
294 40
0.4% Rather not
57▲ 11 Berry 47.4%
251 38
0.3% Rather not
58▲ 3 Lily 47.4%
251 38
0.3% Rather not
59▼ 6 Evepre-patch 48.9%
94 23
0.1% Rather not
60▼ 6 Finx 47.9%
146 30
0.3% Rather not
61▼ 16 Bonnie 48.1%
129 28
0.3% Rather not
62▼ 3 Buzz 45.9%
645 52
1.5% Rather not
63▲ 6 Jae-Yongpre-patch 48.8%
84 21
0.1% Rather not
64▲ 6 Bopre-patch 46.8%
220 36
0.9% Rather not
65▲ 1 Crowpre-patch 45.9%
442 46
0.6% Rather not
66▲ 6 Leonpre-patch 45.7%
337 42
0.5% Rather not
67▼ 2 Draco 45.9%
207 35
0.2% Rather not
68▼ 4 Alli 45.6%
182 33
0.5% Rather not
69▼ 6 Ruffspre-patch 45.7%
151 30
0.1% Rather not
70▲ 6 Lumipre-patch 45.5%
198 34
0.5% Rather not
71▼ 11 Mico 45.4%
205 35
0.8% Rather not
72▲ 1 Shelly 44.2%
1115 60
1.8% Rather not
73▲ 1 Pierce 45.5%
134 28
0.3% Rather not
74▲ 7 Glowy 45.7%
92 23
0.1% Rather not
75▼ 13 Noripre-patch 45.3%
170 32
0.4% Rather not
76▼ 9 Gigi 45.2%
157 31
0.4% Rather not
77▲ 2 Meeple 44.9%
214 35
0.6% Rather not
78▲ 4 Squeak 44.7%
228 36
0.5% Rather not
79▼ 2 Jessiepre-patch 44.7%
235 37
0.5% Rather not
80▼ 5 Pam 44.6%
175 32
0.6% Rather not
81▲ 2 Amberpre-patch 44.1%
177 33
0.6% Rather not
82▼ 2 Barley 43.3%
446 46
1.2% Rather not
83▼ 5 Kit 42.3%
385 44
0.8% Rather not
84▲ 1 Najia 40.2%
97 24
0.1% Rather not
85▲ 4 Mina 41.8%
292 40
0.5% Rather not
86▲ 6 Mandy 40.9%
154 31
0.4% Rather not
87▲ 1 Pocopre-patch 41.6%
413 45
1.2% Rather not
88▼ 4 Beapre-patch 40.4%
208 35
0.6% Rather not
89▲ 1 Chuckpre-patch 32.6%
46 12
0.4% Rather not
90▲ 1 Byron 39.0%
146 30
0.6% Rather not
91▼ 4 Kaze 40.2%
264 39
0.6% Rather not
92▼ 6 Boltpre-patch 38.8%
178 33
0.3% Rather not
93 Janetpre-patch 35.3%
85 22
0.1% Rather not
94▲ 6 Lolapre-patch 36.0%
150 30
0.2% Rather not
95▲ 3 Rosa 38.3%
397 45
2.0% Rather not
96 8-Bitpre-patch 36.1%
216 36
0.6% Rather not
97▲ 4 Nani 35.5%
211 35
0.4% Rather not
98▼ 2 Belle 30.1%
93 23
0.3% Rather not
99▲ 6 Brockpre-patch 37.1%
450 47
0.8% Rather not
100▼ 1 Gus 34.0%
162 31
0.1% Rather not
101▼ 7 Penny 34.6%
211 35
0.4% Rather not
102▼ 7 Piper 30.7%
114 26
0.4% Rather not
103▼ 1 Angelo 26.7%
86 22
0.4% Rather not
104▼ 1 Gray 30.6%
134 28
14.4% Rather not
105 Gene 28.6%
126 28
0.5% Rather not