
Heist
194,431 battles collected on this map.
MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 50 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 3,445 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 628 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 3,445 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 628 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (35 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Nori |
67.4% | 68325 | 100 | 9.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Wendy |
65.9% | 2864 | 74 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▲ 1 | Mico |
62.5% | 41121 | 100 | 2.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 1 | Hank |
63.1% | 10062 | 93 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Gigi |
63.5% | 5353 | 84 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Kaze |
61.5% | 19972 | 100 | 2.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 1 | Shade |
61.3% | 6981 | 88 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
60.8% | 11210 | 95 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 2 | Lumi |
61.3% | 5297 | 83 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Starr Nova |
60.3% | 8355 | 90 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 3 | R-T |
61.1% | 2511 | 72 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | – | Bolt |
59.8% | 5960 | 85 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 4 | Melodie |
58.5% | 40212 | 100 | 2.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Juju |
60.7% | 1852 | 68 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Trunk |
59.7% | 2324 | 71 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 5 | Draco |
58.7% | 2702 | 73 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Pierce |
57.7% | 5653 | 84 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Chuck |
57.0% | 18830 | 100 | 1.6% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 4 | Emz |
56.0% | 40070 | 100 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Amber |
56.6% | 7102 | 88 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 2 | Ruffs |
58.0% | 2001 | 69 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Nani |
56.4% | 6050 | 85 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 1 | Moe |
57.2% | 2324 | 71 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 1 | Ziggy |
57.1% | 2429 | 72 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 2 | Sprout |
56.8% | 2955 | 75 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 3 | Lola |
56.3% | 2969 | 75 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 8 | Bull |
54.6% | 45229 | 100 | 2.4% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▼ 2 | Nita |
54.6% | 47817 | 100 | 4.0% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▲ 4 | Doug |
55.6% | 2543 | 72 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | – | Mina |
55.5% | 2105 | 70 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▲ 1 | Stu |
54.7% | 3720 | 78 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▲ 4 | Chester |
54.7% | 3778 | 78 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▼ 2 | Griff |
53.2% | 27073 | 100 | 2.5% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▼ 6 | Darryl |
53.1% | 16294 | 100 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | ▲ 3 | Willow |
54.2% | 2423 | 72 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
54.9% | 1336 | 63 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | ▲ 3 | Bo |
52.9% | 7902 | 89 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 38 | ▼ 4 | Berry |
51.9% | 21014 | 100 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 4 | Sam |
53.1% | 1927 | 68 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 4 | Jessie |
51.2% | 59091 | 100 | 4.3% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 2 | Najia |
53.4% | 1613 | 66 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 3 | Glowy |
52.5% | 2625 | 73 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 2 | Kit |
51.7% | 5442 | 84 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 4 | Finx |
53.6% | 1080 | 60 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 2 | Mandy |
51.0% | 14621 | 99 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 1 | Janet |
52.7% | 1238 | 62 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 1 | Gray |
51.5% | 2751 | 74 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 6 | Penny |
50.0% | 30375 | 100 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Carl |
49.3% | 12444 | 96 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 1 | Angelo |
50.7% | 1646 | 66 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 2 | Meeple |
50.2% | 1873 | 68 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▲ 1 | Jae-Yong |
51.7% | 625 | 51 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 2 | Bibi |
48.5% | 21138 | 100 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▲ 2 | 8-Bit |
48.1% | 32792 | 100 | 4.1% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Edgar |
47.9% | 50326 | 100 | 5.5% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 4 | Dynamike |
47.1% | 25992 | 100 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 57 | – | Alli |
49.0% | 1114 | 60 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 58 | – | Barley |
45.5% | 16022 | 100 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 5 | Gus |
46.6% | 1776 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 1 | Mortis |
45.4% | 4939 | 82 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 2 | Cordelius |
44.7% | 7054 | 88 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Colt |
43.5% | 41921 | 100 | 4.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 3 | Kenji |
43.5% | 8852 | 91 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 2 | Squeak |
42.9% | 9004 | 91 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 2 | Brock |
42.1% | 28681 | 100 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 1 | Tick |
42.0% | 15834 | 100 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
42.2% | 6671 | 87 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 2 | Ash |
42.3% | 4335 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Crow |
41.3% | 21489 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 3 | Rico |
40.6% | 22588 | 100 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
40.5% | 20983 | 100 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 2 | Pearl |
40.9% | 4052 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Surge |
40.2% | 8278 | 90 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 3 | Piper |
39.6% | 9400 | 92 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Meg |
39.5% | 8025 | 90 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 2 | Buzz |
39.5% | 5854 | 85 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Tara |
39.0% | 4762 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 1 | Max |
38.8% | 7228 | 88 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 4 | El Primo |
38.4% | 11102 | 95 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 1 | Spike |
38.3% | 10373 | 94 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 1 | Frank |
37.8% | 10398 | 94 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 2 | Clancy |
37.8% | 5081 | 83 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Lily |
37.6% | 5715 | 85 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 8 | Eve |
37.5% | 3045 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 1 | Pam |
36.9% | 3191 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 2 | Shelly |
34.6% | 9753 | 93 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 2 | Leon |
34.5% | 5894 | 85 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 3 | Charlie |
34.4% | 3239 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 1 | Fang |
34.0% | 4724 | 82 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 3 | Grom |
33.9% | 4604 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 3 | Gale |
33.7% | 3327 | 77 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 1 | Maisie |
33.1% | 3712 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 2 | Poco |
32.6% | 5255 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
32.5% | 4020 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 1 | Mr. P |
32.1% | 3470 | 77 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 3 | Rosa |
31.9% | 4341 | 80 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 1 | Byron |
31.8% | 5721 | 85 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
31.5% | 5444 | 84 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 3 | Jacky |
30.5% | 3063 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 8 | Ollie |
29.3% | 937 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Belle |
29.8% | 3290 | 76 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 2 | Buster |
29.1% | 1754 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Bonnie |
28.4% | 3521 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Bea |
27.6% | 3585 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Sandy |
23.3% | 2796 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
21.9% | 2052 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not |