Brawl Hockey

Raging Ocean

78,573 battles collected on this map.

MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 51 of 106 brawlers above 50%.

Recommendation

Damage Dealer 1786 games

Damage Dealer 3398 games

Controller 1629 games

Damage Dealer 1427 games

Damage Dealer 748 games

Controller 3391 games

Controller 1526 games

Controller 14548 games

Damage Dealer 542 games

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean

Strong pickThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Air Hockey): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.

TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.

Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

Underrated

Damian 62.7%Winrate 3,031 games

Gigi 63.9%Winrate 1,469 games

Lumi 62.4%Winrate 1,786 games

Ziggy 64.4%Winrate 750 games

Overrated

Edgar 44.9%Winrate 21,257 games

Colt 46.5%Winrate 18,097 games

Rico 45.1%Winrate 11,575 games

Emz 47.4%Winrate 9,542 games

If you queue as three

three-brawler line-ups that actually exist — counted across the whole mode.

This is for Air Hockey as a whole, not for this map. There are not enough numbers here yet for a map-specific calculation — the calibration needs line-ups actually played on this map. As soon as enough accumulate, the calculation for Raging Ocean appears in this spot; until then the mode-wide list is the best available answer.

Out of 110 line-ups with 120+ games.

Griff

Mortis

Nori

62.8% 162 games

Bolt

Edgar

Mortis

62.7% 183 games

Bibi

Edgar

Nori

61.0% 139 games

Bibi

Emz

Mortis

58.7% 143 games

Edgar

Griff

Mortis

58.4% 279 games

Bolt

Edgar

Nori

58.3% 168 games

How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. three-brawler line-ups that actually exist, counted across the whole mode — not for this map. There is no basis for a map-specific calculation yet: the calibration needs line-ups played on this map. The measured number is therefore not a prediction for Raging Ocean, but the answer to what generally wins in Air Hockey.

Measured · in the mode. The strongest three-brawler line-ups in this mode, out of 110 with at least 120 games. The number is deliberately cautious: unchecked, the luckiest outlier would sit on top. Per mode, not per map — on a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a number of its own.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#		Brawler	Win rate	Games	Trust	Pick rate	Rating
1	–	Wendy	73.4%	2386	72	0.6%	Strong pick
2	–	Bolt	67.4%	6368	86	1.2%	Strong pick
3	–	Nori	64.1%	16828	100	3.0%	Strong pick
4	–	Starr Nova	63.4%	5603	84	1.1%	Strong pick
5	–	Damian	62.7%	3031	75	0.5%	Strong pick
6	–	Gigi	63.9%	1469	64	0.4%	Strong pick
7	–	Lumi	62.4%	1786	67	0.3%	Strong pick
8	–	Ziggy	64.4%	750	54	0.1%	Strong pick
9	▲ 6	Jae-Yong	63.3%	859	56	0.1%	Strong pick
10	▲ 2	Chester	60.0%	3398	77	0.7%	Strong pick
11	▼ 1	Sam	61.4%	1205	61	0.2%	Strong pick
12	▼ 3	Mina	59.3%	3532	77	0.5%	Strong pick
13	▲ 3	Finx	61.8%	1018	59	0.2%	Strong pick
14	▼ 3	Doug	60.2%	1772	67	0.5%	Strong pick
15	▲ 2	Amber	60.3%	1629	66	0.3%	Strong pick
16	▼ 3	Pierce	59.0%	3261	76	0.5%	Strong pick
17	▼ 3	Kaze	58.6%	3996	79	0.6%	Strong pick
18	–	Moe	60.1%	1427	64	0.3%	Strong pick
19	▲ 3	R-T	61.9%	748	54	0.3%	Good pick
20	–	Sprout	59.1%	2001	69	0.5%	Good pick
21	▲ 2	Trunk	60.1%	1189	61	0.2%	Good pick
22	▼ 3	Gray	57.5%	5239	83	0.9%	Good pick
23	▼ 2	Meeple	58.9%	1680	66	0.4%	Good pick
24	▲ 1	Glowy	60.3%	846	56	0.2%	Good pick
25	▼ 1	Sirius	58.1%	2082	69	0.5%	Good pick
26	▲ 2	Alli	59.0%	1176	61	0.2%	Good pick
27	–	Draco	59.1%	1034	59	0.2%	Good pick
28	▼ 2	Bo	56.8%	3391	77	0.6%	Good pick
29	▲ 4	Hank	58.8%	972	58	0.2%	Good pick
30	–	Stu	55.6%	9305	92	1.8%	Good pick
31	▼ 2	Ruffs	58.1%	1143	61	0.1%	Good pick
32	–	Willow	57.4%	1526	65	0.3%	Good pick
33	▲ 2	Shade	56.1%	2392	72	0.6%	Good pick
34	–	Najia	58.3%	823	56	0.2%	Good pick
35	▼ 4	Griff	54.1%	14548	99	2.9%	Good pick
36	–	Chuck	58.5%	542	49	0.1%	Good pick
37	–	Bibi	52.9%	17155	100	2.7%	Solid
38	▲ 1	Kit	53.9%	3152	76	0.3%	Solid
39	▲ 5	Gus	54.8%	1362	63	0.3%	Solid
40	▲ 1	Mico	54.6%	1269	62	0.4%	Solid
41	▲ 2	Juju	57.8%	403	45	0.0%	Solid
42	▲ 3	Lola	55.2%	846	56	0.1%	Solid
43	▼ 5	Meg	52.2%	6190	86	1.1%	Solid
44	▼ 4	Mandy	52.8%	3015	75	0.3%	Solid
45	▼ 3	Clancy	51.5%	4922	82	0.8%	Solid
46	▲ 1	Mortis	50.5%	33527	100	5.7%	Solid
47	▲ 5	Janet	55.0%	516	49	0.1%	Solid
48	▼ 2	Gale	51.2%	4743	82	0.8%	Solid
49	▼ 2	Ash	51.8%	1679	66	0.4%	Solid
50	▼ 1	Melodie	50.4%	4441	81	0.9%	Solid
51	▲ 1	Max	50.0%	7610	89	1.8%	Solid
52	▼ 2	Kenji	49.4%	9381	92	1.8%	Solid
53	▲ 2	Buzz	49.8%	4847	82	1.0%	Solid
54	▲ 2	Fang	49.1%	14318	98	2.9%	Solid
55	▲ 3	Frank	49.2%	9002	91	2.5%	Solid
56	▼ 3	Lou	49.7%	2968	75	0.8%	Solid
57	–	Nani	50.5%	1385	63	0.3%	Solid
58	▼ 4	Otis	49.7%	2821	74	0.6%	Solid
59	–	Cordelius	49.1%	3465	77	0.8%	Solid
60	▲ 1	Surge	47.5%	9718	93	1.5%	Solid
61	▲ 1	Emz	47.4%	9542	92	2.2%	Solid
62	▲ 1	Colt	46.5%	18097	100	2.8%	Solid
63	▼ 3	Jessie	46.9%	3488	77	0.9%	Rather not
64	–	Bull	46.2%	6619	87	1.3%	Rather not
65	▲ 3	Jacky	46.0%	2985	75	0.7%	Rather not
66	▲ 3	Edgar	44.9%	21257	100	5.2%	Rather not
67	▼ 1	Rico	45.1%	11575	95	2.6%	Rather not
68	▲ 3	El Primo	45.3%	6938	88	2.2%	Rather not
69	▲ 1	Angelo	47.4%	443	46	0.1%	Rather not
70	▼ 3	Tick	44.8%	7931	90	1.8%	Rather not
71	▲ 5	Brock	44.5%	9104	92	1.8%	Rather not
72	▼ 7	Sandy	45.1%	2373	71	0.5%	Rather not
73	▲ 1	8-Bit	44.6%	4688	82	1.6%	Rather not
74	▼ 2	Bea	44.8%	3235	76	0.6%	Rather not
75	▲ 3	Crow	43.9%	8164	90	1.7%	Rather not
76	▲ 1	Spike	43.9%	6305	86	1.3%	Rather not
77	▲ 6	Carl	43.8%	4257	80	1.0%	Rather not
78	▲ 1	Darryl	43.7%	4019	79	0.9%	Rather not
79	▼ 6	Charlie	44.0%	1569	65	0.5%	Rather not
80	▼ 5	Tara	43.4%	4024	79	1.3%	Rather not
81	▲ 1	Nita	43.1%	4277	80	1.2%	Rather not
82	▼ 2	Pearl	43.4%	2147	70	0.4%	Rather not
83	▼ 2	Poco	42.8%	5575	84	1.2%	Rather not
84	–	Colette	42.7%	5312	84	1.2%	Rather not
85	▲ 1	Dynamike	41.7%	7591	89	1.7%	Rather not
86	▲ 1	Maisie	41.8%	2792	74	0.8%	Rather not
87	▲ 2	Shelly	40.7%	6873	87	1.9%	Rather not
88	▲ 2	Leon	40.8%	5144	83	1.2%	Rather not
89	▼ 1	Penny	40.9%	2381	72	0.7%	Rather not
90	▲ 4	Squeak	40.3%	3145	76	0.8%	Rather not
91	–	Piper	40.2%	3629	78	1.0%	Rather not
92	▲ 3	Berry	40.4%	2002	69	0.6%	Rather not
93	▼ 8	Ollie	40.5%	1292	62	0.3%	Rather not
94	▼ 1	Rosa	39.8%	1899	68	0.7%	Rather not
95	▼ 3	Pam	39.8%	1665	66	0.5%	Rather not
96	–	Buster	39.6%	1579	65	0.3%	Rather not
97	–	Byron	38.5%	3087	75	0.7%	Rather not
98	▲ 2	Gene	38.3%	1288	62	0.4%	Rather not
99	▼ 1	Lily	37.9%	2401	72	0.7%	Rather not
100	▲ 1	Belle	37.4%	1451	64	0.3%	Rather not
101	▼ 2	Grom	36.5%	1762	67	0.4%	Rather not
102	▲ 1	Barley	36.0%	2556	73	0.8%	Rather not
103	▼ 1	Larry & Lawrie	35.8%	1586	65	0.4%	Rather not
104	▲ 1	Bonnie	33.7%	1227	62	0.4%	Rather not
105	▼ 1	Mr. P	32.2%	1440	64	0.6%	Rather not
106	–	Eve	27.5%	1034	59	0.4%	Rather not