
Hot Zone
76 battles collected on this map.
three-brawler line-ups that actually exist — counted across the whole mode.
This is for Hot Zone as a whole, not for this map. There are not enough numbers here yet for a map-specific calculation — the calibration needs line-ups actually played on this map. As soon as enough accumulate, the calculation for Ring of Fire appears in this spot; until then the mode-wide list is the best available answer.
Out of 587 line-ups with 120+ games.
What you see here. three-brawler line-ups that actually exist, counted across the whole mode — not for this map. There is no basis for a map-specific calculation yet: the calibration needs line-ups played on this map. The measured number is therefore not a prediction for Ring of Fire, but the answer to what generally wins in Hot Zone.
Measured · in the mode. The strongest three-brawler line-ups in this mode, out of 587 with at least 120 games. The number is deliberately cautious: unchecked, the luckiest outlier would sit on top. Per mode, not per map — on a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a number of its own.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▲ 1 | Pierce |
66.7% | 30 | 6 | 6.6% | Rather not | ||
| 2 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
72.7% | 22 | 1 | 4.8% | Rather not | ||
| 3 | – | Emz |
76.9% | 13 | 0 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 4 | ▲ 2 | Surge |
71.4% | 14 | 0 | 3.1% | Rather not | ||
| 5 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
56.7% | 30 | 6 | 6.6% | Rather not | ||
| 6 | ▲ 3 | Meg |
55.6% | 27 | 4 | 5.9% | Rather not | ||
| 7 | ▼ 2 | Stu |
56.0% | 25 | 3 | 5.5% | Rather not | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Griff |
57.9% | 19 | 0 | 4.2% | Rather not | ||
| 9 | NEW | Lumi |
60.0% | 10 | 0 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 10 | ▼ 2 | 8-Bit |
43.5% | 23 | 2 | 5.0% | Rather not | ||
| 11 | – | Finx |
40.0% | 10 | 0 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 12 | – | Penny |
36.4% | 11 | 0 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 13 | ▼ 3 | Max |
37.0% | 27 | 4 | 5.9% | Rather not | ||
| 14 | NEW | Ruffs |
20.0% | 10 | 0 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 15 | ▼ 2 | Starr Nova |
20.0% | 15 | 0 | 3.3% | Rather not | ||
| 16 | NEW | Rico |
9.1% | 11 | 0 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 17 | ▼ 3 | Crow |
24.0% | 25 | 3 | 5.5% | Rather not | ||
| 18 | ▼ 3 | Bo |
14.3% | 21 | 1 | 4.6% | Rather not |