
Bounty
256,120 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 37 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 5,397 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 243 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 5,397 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 243 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (167 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
67.0% | 34877 | 100 | 2.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Wendy |
60.0% | 116280 | 100 | 7.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Najia |
57.7% | 18838 | 100 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Pierce |
57.0% | 37645 | 100 | 2.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Nani |
56.9% | 30063 | 100 | 2.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Mina |
57.2% | 8614 | 91 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 1 | Angelo |
55.5% | 16026 | 100 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 2 | Sprout |
55.8% | 7565 | 89 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 2 | Brock |
54.6% | 102258 | 100 | 6.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 2 | Gray |
54.9% | 13870 | 98 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 2 | Belle |
54.5% | 22583 | 100 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 1 | Tick |
53.7% | 46545 | 100 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Piper |
53.4% | 138960 | 100 | 9.0% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 2 | Jae-Yong |
55.3% | 2310 | 71 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Max |
53.3% | 17657 | 100 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 2 | Bo |
53.2% | 15278 | 99 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Mandy |
52.8% | 44046 | 100 | 2.9% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 1 | Byron |
52.4% | 56988 | 100 | 3.7% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 4 | 8-Bit |
52.6% | 23232 | 100 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 2 | Grom |
52.5% | 20511 | 100 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Meeple |
52.7% | 8163 | 90 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Gus |
52.2% | 15423 | 99 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▼ 3 | Juju |
53.3% | 2902 | 74 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Ziggy |
52.7% | 2693 | 73 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 3 | R-T |
52.3% | 3476 | 77 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Mortis |
51.2% | 24895 | 100 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▲ 2 | Janet |
52.0% | 3321 | 76 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 9 | Nori |
50.6% | 34414 | 100 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 5 | Gigi |
51.8% | 3244 | 76 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | Ruffs |
51.8% | 3246 | 76 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 12 | Glowy |
51.8% | 3174 | 76 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Finx |
51.9% | 2522 | 72 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Kit |
50.8% | 10226 | 93 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 8 | Starr Nova |
50.3% | 9124 | 92 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 4 | Mico |
50.7% | 4251 | 80 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 10 | Eve |
50.6% | 4989 | 83 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 10 | Bonnie |
50.3% | 6169 | 86 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 2 | Gene |
49.9% | 9431 | 92 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Fang |
49.5% | 18686 | 100 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 5 | Leon |
49.4% | 21452 | 100 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Carl |
49.7% | 9420 | 92 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 4 | Bea |
49.3% | 25927 | 100 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 7 | Mr. P |
49.8% | 6009 | 85 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 2 | Kaze |
49.8% | 5119 | 83 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Pearl |
48.7% | 5564 | 84 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 2 | Squeak |
47.7% | 17683 | 100 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Penny |
47.5% | 12080 | 96 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Stu |
47.5% | 8545 | 91 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Colt |
46.3% | 49093 | 100 | 3.2% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 3 | Moe |
47.5% | 1740 | 67 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 1 | Spike |
45.9% | 19865 | 100 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | – | Sirius |
46.3% | 7354 | 88 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 2 | Edgar |
45.1% | 78369 | 100 | 5.1% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
45.8% | 3369 | 77 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 2 | Lumi |
45.8% | 2667 | 73 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 2 | Maisie |
45.3% | 5487 | 84 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 4 | Damian |
45.2% | 1981 | 69 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 1 | Chester |
44.5% | 5086 | 83 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 1 | Crow |
43.7% | 24284 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Amber |
44.0% | 4143 | 80 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 5 | Larry & Lawrie |
43.9% | 4091 | 80 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 7 | Alli |
43.9% | 2369 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 4 | Willow |
43.7% | 3011 | 75 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 2 | Dynamike |
42.5% | 21836 | 100 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 1 | Rico |
42.5% | 22300 | 100 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 3 | Otis |
42.8% | 7216 | 88 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 3 | Chuck |
43.4% | 1839 | 68 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 4 | Griff |
42.4% | 17743 | 100 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 4 | Lily |
42.4% | 7238 | 88 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 2 | Jessie |
41.7% | 9530 | 92 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Charlie |
41.6% | 3607 | 78 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 5 | Doug |
41.2% | 2243 | 71 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Emz |
40.1% | 21940 | 100 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 2 | Surge |
40.1% | 12740 | 97 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Colette |
39.5% | 12843 | 97 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 1 | Ollie |
39.3% | 1100 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 4 | Shade |
39.1% | 3349 | 77 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 4 | Melodie |
38.8% | 3635 | 78 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
38.5% | 4419 | 81 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 1 | Draco |
38.3% | 1022 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 1 | Hank |
38.0% | 1682 | 66 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 3 | Buster |
37.6% | 1394 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 2 | Kenji |
37.0% | 6437 | 86 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Bibi |
36.9% | 7183 | 88 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 2 | Pam |
37.1% | 3018 | 75 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 1 | Sam |
36.4% | 1405 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Gale |
36.3% | 4513 | 81 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 2 | Buzz |
35.3% | 5200 | 83 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Tara |
34.9% | 4327 | 80 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 2 | Frank |
34.8% | 7363 | 88 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Meg |
34.6% | 4624 | 81 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 1 | Barley |
34.2% | 6235 | 86 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
33.9% | 1956 | 69 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Poco |
33.5% | 7384 | 88 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Sandy |
33.3% | 2942 | 75 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 3 | Trunk |
32.8% | 1425 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Darryl |
32.9% | 5129 | 83 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 2 | Cordelius |
32.6% | 3613 | 78 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 1 | Clancy |
32.2% | 2193 | 70 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Berry |
31.4% | 3876 | 79 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Nita |
30.5% | 6277 | 86 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Shelly |
27.7% | 8788 | 91 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 2 | Rosa |
27.6% | 3815 | 79 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | El Primo |
26.0% | 5782 | 85 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 2 | Jacky |
25.7% | 2922 | 75 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Bull |
25.5% | 6187 | 86 | 0.4% | Rather not |