
Bounty
257,235 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 37 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,689 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 331 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,689 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 331 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (220 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
67.1% | 34903 | 100 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Wendy |
60.0% | 117216 | 100 | 8.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Najia |
57.7% | 18901 | 100 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 1 | Pierce |
57.0% | 37784 | 100 | 2.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
56.9% | 30070 | 100 | 1.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Mina |
57.2% | 8676 | 91 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 1 | Angelo |
55.5% | 16086 | 100 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 2 | Sprout |
55.8% | 7600 | 89 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 2 | Brock |
54.6% | 102358 | 100 | 4.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 2 | Gray |
54.9% | 13958 | 98 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 2 | Belle |
54.5% | 22687 | 100 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 1 | Tick |
53.7% | 46494 | 100 | 2.5% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Piper |
53.4% | 139247 | 100 | 6.5% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 2 | Jae-Yong |
55.4% | 2324 | 71 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Max |
53.3% | 17816 | 100 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 2 | Bo |
53.2% | 15366 | 99 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Mandy |
52.9% | 43980 | 100 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 5 | 8-Bit |
52.6% | 23454 | 100 | 2.2% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Byron |
52.4% | 57186 | 100 | 3.6% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 2 | Grom |
52.5% | 20541 | 100 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Meeple |
52.7% | 8176 | 90 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Gus |
52.3% | 15538 | 100 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▼ 3 | Juju |
53.2% | 2911 | 75 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Ziggy |
53.0% | 2699 | 73 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▲ 3 | R-T |
52.4% | 3486 | 77 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Mortis |
51.2% | 25035 | 100 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▲ 2 | Janet |
52.0% | 3328 | 77 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 3 | Gigi |
52.0% | 3267 | 76 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 7 | Nori |
50.6% | 34697 | 100 | 2.9% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 12 | Glowy |
51.8% | 3193 | 76 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 1 | Finx |
52.0% | 2530 | 72 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 3 | Ruffs |
51.7% | 3255 | 76 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 4 | Kit |
50.6% | 10131 | 93 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 4 | Mico |
50.9% | 4259 | 80 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 8 | Starr Nova |
50.3% | 9179 | 92 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 10 | Eve |
50.6% | 5006 | 83 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 10 | Bonnie |
50.3% | 6194 | 86 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 3 | Gene |
49.9% | 9481 | 92 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Fang |
49.5% | 18787 | 100 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Carl |
49.8% | 9488 | 92 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 7 | Leon |
49.4% | 21569 | 100 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 4 | Bea |
49.2% | 26028 | 100 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 3 | Kaze |
49.9% | 5161 | 83 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 11 | Mr. P |
49.8% | 6029 | 85 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Pearl |
48.6% | 5605 | 84 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 2 | Squeak |
47.7% | 17691 | 100 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 1 | Stu |
47.6% | 8595 | 91 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 1 | Penny |
47.4% | 12132 | 96 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Colt |
46.3% | 49331 | 100 | 3.2% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 3 | Moe |
47.4% | 1740 | 67 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 1 | Spike |
45.9% | 19942 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | – | Sirius |
46.2% | 7258 | 88 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 2 | Edgar |
45.2% | 78930 | 100 | 7.6% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
45.8% | 3380 | 77 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 2 | Lumi |
45.8% | 2681 | 73 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 2 | Maisie |
45.2% | 5507 | 84 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 3 | Damian |
45.5% | 1980 | 69 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 1 | Chester |
44.6% | 5112 | 83 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 1 | Crow |
43.7% | 24407 | 100 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 1 | Amber |
44.1% | 4145 | 80 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 5 | Larry & Lawrie |
43.7% | 4115 | 80 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 7 | Alli |
43.9% | 2371 | 71 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 4 | Willow |
43.8% | 3018 | 75 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 2 | Dynamike |
42.5% | 21905 | 100 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 1 | Rico |
42.5% | 22450 | 100 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 3 | Otis |
42.8% | 7280 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 3 | Griff |
42.4% | 17831 | 100 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 2 | Chuck |
43.3% | 1843 | 68 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 4 | Lily |
42.3% | 7254 | 88 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 2 | Jessie |
41.7% | 9584 | 92 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Charlie |
41.6% | 3642 | 78 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 5 | Doug |
41.4% | 2249 | 71 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 1 | Emz |
40.1% | 22087 | 100 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 1 | Surge |
40.0% | 12827 | 97 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 1 | Colette |
39.4% | 12932 | 97 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 4 | Shade |
39.1% | 3367 | 77 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 1 | Ollie |
39.1% | 1104 | 60 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 3 | Melodie |
38.5% | 3653 | 78 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
38.4% | 4436 | 81 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 1 | Draco |
38.6% | 1032 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 1 | Hank |
38.0% | 1693 | 66 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 1 | Buster |
37.4% | 1398 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 2 | Kenji |
37.0% | 6501 | 87 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
37.0% | 3032 | 75 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Bibi |
36.8% | 7219 | 88 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Gale |
36.3% | 4538 | 81 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Sam |
36.2% | 1411 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 2 | Buzz |
35.4% | 5229 | 83 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
34.8% | 4369 | 81 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 1 | Frank |
34.6% | 7393 | 88 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Meg |
34.5% | 4672 | 82 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 1 | Barley |
34.2% | 6281 | 86 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
33.9% | 1969 | 69 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Poco |
33.5% | 7447 | 89 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Sandy |
33.2% | 2964 | 75 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 2 | Trunk |
33.0% | 1429 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
32.9% | 5174 | 83 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Cordelius |
32.5% | 3634 | 78 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Clancy |
32.0% | 2215 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Berry |
31.5% | 3900 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Nita |
30.6% | 6327 | 86 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Shelly |
27.7% | 8863 | 91 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 2 | Rosa |
27.6% | 3848 | 79 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | El Primo |
26.1% | 5832 | 85 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 2 | Jacky |
25.8% | 2945 | 75 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Bull |
25.6% | 6231 | 86 | 0.5% | Rather not |