My roster

Enter your player tag and the site hides everything you cannot play anyway: brawlers you are missing, and those below power 9 — below 11 from Mythic upwards. The tag goes to the official API once and then stays in your browser. It is neither stored nor logged here, and there is no account.

You can find your tag in the game, under your name in your profile.

EN
Brawl Ball

Slalom Slam

46,182 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 41 of 105 brawlers above 50%.

Trophy Road
Slalom SlamBrawl Ball

Recommendation

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean
Strong pick Good pick SolidThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Brawl Ball): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.
TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.
Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 3,896 real line-ups.

1
79.0% expected
2
79.0% expected
3
79.0% expected
4
79.0% expected
5
79.0% expected
6
79.0% expected
How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 3,896 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (229 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#BrawlerWin rateGamesTrustPick rateRating
1 Bibi 62.7%
9969 93
3.6% Strong pick
2 Emz 61.3%
4834 82
1.7% Strong pick
3 Frank 60.8%
7871 89
2.8% Strong pick
4▲ 1 Griff 59.1%
5324 84
1.9% Good pick
5▼ 1 Edgar 58.7%
8261 90
3.0% Good pick
6 Sirius 57.7%
2532 72
0.9% Solid
7 Clancy 57.5%
2310 71
0.8% Solid
8 Gale 56.6%
3688 78
1.3% Solid
9 Spike 55.8%
4056 79
1.5% Solid
10▲ 2 Moe 57.2%
1318 63
0.5% Solid
11▼ 1 Damian 55.6%
3264 76
1.2% Solid
12▼ 1 Kenji 55.1%
3638 78
1.3% Solid
13▲ 1 Max 54.5%
3989 79
1.4% Solid
14▼ 1 Fang 54.2%
4465 81
1.6% Solid
15▲ 1 Melodie 54.5%
2506 72
0.9% Solid
16▼ 1 Surge 53.5%
5410 84
2.0% Solid
17 Ash 53.8%
1943 68
0.7% Solid
18▲ 1 Maisie 53.2%
2632 73
0.9% Solid
19▲ 1 Hank 53.5%
2030 69
0.7% Solid
20▲ 1 Tara 53.1%
2482 72
0.9% Solid
21▼ 3 Crow 52.5%
3150 76
1.1% Solid
22 Colette 51.9%
4292 80
1.5% Rather not
23 Dynamike 51.3%
4910 82
1.8% Rather not
24 Darryl 51.3%
5083 83
1.8% Rather not
25 Jacky 51.6%
3083 75
1.1% Rather not
26 Rico 50.8%
6016 85
2.2% Rather not
27 Starr Nova 51.2%
2704 73
1.0% Rather not
28▲ 3 Nita 50.6%
5005 83
1.8% Rather not
29 Buzz 50.6%
3730 78
1.3% Rather not
30▼ 2 Mortis 50.0%
7251 88
2.6% Rather not
31▼ 1 Larry & Lawrie 51.2%
1539 65
0.6% Rather not
32▲ 5 Charlie 51.5%
1225 62
0.4% Rather not
33▲ 5 Mina 50.7%
2117 70
0.8% Rather not
34▲ 5 Chester 50.2%
3620 78
1.3% Rather not
35▼ 3 Bull 49.6%
7889 89
2.8% Rather not
36▼ 2 Sam 50.6%
1970 69
0.7% Rather not
37▼ 2 Carl 50.1%
3233 76
1.2% Rather not
38▲ 2 Lumi 50.6%
1760 67
0.6% Rather not
39▼ 6 Draco 50.6%
1441 64
0.5% Rather not
40▼ 4 El Primo 49.1%
6990 88
2.5% Rather not
41 Ollie 50.7%
1121 60
0.4% Rather not
42▲ 6 Pearl 49.5%
1892 68
0.7% Rather not
43▲ 1 Jae-Yong 50.2%
968 58
0.3% Rather not
44▲ 5 Finx 50.0%
1078 60
0.4% Rather not
45 Stu 48.5%
5047 83
1.8% Rather not
46▲ 1 Bolt 49.4%
1465 64
0.5% Rather not
47▼ 1 Shade 48.6%
2736 74
1.0% Rather not
48▼ 5 Nori 49.0%
1682 66
0.6% Rather not
49▲ 1 Cordelius 48.6%
2469 72
0.9% Rather not
50▼ 8 Lou 48.9%
1803 67
0.7% Rather not
51▲ 5 Meg 48.5%
2369 71
0.9% Rather not
52▼ 1 Jessie 48.3%
2292 71
0.8% Rather not
53▲ 6 Gigi 48.7%
1139 60
0.4% Rather not
54▲ 1 Trunk 48.1%
1885 68
0.7% Rather not
55▲ 5 Squeak 47.9%
1823 68
0.7% Rather not
56▲ 1 Leon 47.6%
2379 71
0.9% Rather not
57▼ 4 Bo 47.7%
2139 70
0.8% Rather not
58▼ 6 Tick 47.7%
2067 69
0.7% Rather not
59▼ 5 Sprout 48.1%
1199 61
0.4% Rather not
60▲ 1 Shelly 46.2%
6935 87
2.5% Rather not
61▲ 7 Otis 46.9%
2097 70
0.8% Rather not
62▼ 4 Willow 47.0%
1889 68
0.7% Rather not
63▲ 2 Kit 46.8%
2243 71
0.8% Rather not
64▼ 2 Pierce 47.0%
1233 62
0.4% Rather not
65▼ 1 Sandy 46.8%
1430 64
0.5% Rather not
66▼ 3 Amber 46.5%
1631 66
0.6% Rather not
67▲ 6 Doug 46.2%
2142 70
0.8% Rather not
68 Wendy 59.3%
27 4
0.0% Rather not
69▼ 2 Juju 46.7%
728 54
0.3% Rather not
70▲ 1 R-T 46.0%
960 58
0.3% Rather not
71▼ 4 Colt 44.6%
6157 86
2.2% Rather not
72▼ 2 Buster 45.5%
1264 62
0.5% Rather not
73▼ 1 Lily 44.6%
1332 63
0.5% Rather not
74▲ 4 Berry 44.4%
1290 62
0.5% Rather not
75▼ 1 Glowy 44.3%
963 58
0.3% Rather not
76▼ 1 Lola 43.9%
1393 63
0.5% Rather not
77▲ 3 Kaze 43.5%
1810 67
0.7% Rather not
78▼ 2 Mico 43.9%
906 57
0.3% Rather not
79 Ruffs 43.6%
1403 64
0.5% Rather not
80▼ 3 Bea 43.1%
2109 70
0.8% Rather not
81▲ 1 Grom 42.5%
1316 63
0.5% Rather not
82▼ 1 Najia 41.9%
745 54
0.3% Rather not
83 Bonnie 41.2%
1426 64
0.5% Rather not
84▲ 3 Ziggy 41.2%
687 53
0.2% Rather not
85▼ 1 Poco 40.6%
3637 78
1.3% Rather not
86 8-Bit 40.6%
2135 70
0.8% Rather not
87▲ 1 Meeple 40.4%
1581 65
0.6% Rather not
88▲ 2 Eve 39.9%
803 55
0.3% Rather not
89▼ 4 Pam 39.7%
1585 65
0.6% Rather not
90▼ 1 Janet 39.5%
774 55
0.3% Rather not
91 Alli 39.3%
854 56
0.3% Rather not
92 Brock 38.5%
4086 80
1.5% Rather not
93▲ 2 Penny 38.4%
1820 67
0.7% Rather not
94▲ 2 Belle 38.3%
1051 59
0.4% Rather not
95▼ 2 Byron 37.9%
1352 63
0.5% Rather not
96▲ 1 Nani 37.8%
1771 67
0.6% Rather not
97▼ 3 Gray 37.7%
1220 61
0.4% Rather not
98 Mr. P 37.3%
1240 62
0.4% Rather not
99 Rosa 36.4%
2682 73
1.0% Rather not
100 Gus 36.2%
1737 67
0.6% Rather not
101 Mandy 33.9%
1278 62
0.5% Rather not
102 Barley 33.2%
2524 72
0.9% Rather not
103 Piper 30.9%
1222 62
0.4% Rather not
104 Gene 27.9%
1162 61
0.4% Rather not
105 Angelo 26.6%
758 54
0.3% Rather not
106 Chuck 24.3%
621 51
0.2% Rather not