My roster

Enter your player tag and the site hides everything you cannot play anyway: brawlers you are missing, and those below power 9 — below 11 from Mythic upwards. The tag goes to the official API once and then stays in your browser. It is neither stored nor logged here, and there is no account.

You can find your tag in the game, under your name in your profile.

EN
Brawl Ball

Slalom Slam

46,342 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 41 of 105 brawlers above 50%.

Trophy Road
Slalom SlamBrawl Ball

Recommendation

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean
Strong pick Good pick SolidThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Brawl Ball): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.
TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.
Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 6,882 real line-ups.

1
80.8% expected
2
80.8% expected
3
80.8% expected
4
80.7% expected
5
80.7% expected
6
80.7% expected
How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 6,882 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (293 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#BrawlerWin rateGamesTrustPick rateRating
1 Bibi 62.7%
9998 93
0.7% Strong pick
2 Emz 61.3%
4850 82
0.4% Good pick
3 Frank 60.7%
7908 89
1.0% Good pick
4▲ 1 Griff 59.1%
5334 84
0.2% Good pick
5▼ 1 Edgar 58.7%
8300 90
1.0% Good pick
6 Sirius 57.8%
2538 72
0.1% Solid
7 Clancy 57.5%
2316 71
0.2% Solid
8 Gale 56.5%
3696 78
0.2% Solid
9 Spike 55.8%
4062 79
0.2% Solid
10▲ 2 Moe 57.3%
1322 63
0.1% Solid
11▼ 1 Damian 55.7%
3268 76
0.1% Solid
12▼ 1 Kenji 55.1%
3646 78
0.2% Solid
13▲ 1 Max 54.4%
4007 79
0.5% Solid
14▼ 1 Fang 54.2%
4476 81
0.3% Solid
15▲ 1 Melodie 54.5%
2512 72
0.2% Solid
16▼ 1 Surge 53.5%
5415 84
0.1% Solid
17 Ash 53.9%
1951 69
0.2% Solid
18 Maisie 53.2%
2640 73
0.2% Rather not
19 Hank 53.5%
2038 69
0.2% Rather not
20▲ 1 Tara 53.1%
2492 72
0.2% Rather not
21▼ 1 Crow 52.4%
3160 76
0.2% Rather not
22 Colette 51.9%
4306 80
0.3% Rather not
23▲ 1 Dynamike 51.4%
4927 82
0.4% Rather not
24▼ 1 Darryl 51.4%
5103 83
0.5% Rather not
25▲ 1 Jacky 51.5%
3102 75
0.4% Rather not
26▼ 1 Rico 50.8%
6033 85
0.4% Rather not
27 Starr Nova 51.2%
2712 73
0.2% Rather not
28▲ 3 Nita 50.5%
5026 83
0.5% Rather not
29 Buzz 50.5%
3735 78
0.1% Rather not
30▼ 2 Mortis 50.0%
7281 88
0.8% Rather not
31▲ 6 Charlie 51.5%
1227 62
0.1% Rather not
32 Larry & Lawrie 51.2%
1542 65
0.1% Rather not
33▲ 5 Mina 50.7%
2123 70
0.2% Rather not
34▲ 1 Carl 50.2%
3246 76
0.3% Rather not
35▲ 4 Chester 50.1%
3627 78
0.1% Rather not
36▼ 3 Bull 49.6%
7910 89
0.5% Rather not
37▼ 3 Sam 50.7%
1979 69
0.2% Rather not
38▲ 2 Lumi 50.5%
1767 67
0.2% Rather not
39▼ 9 Draco 50.7%
1445 64
0.1% Rather not
40▼ 4 El Primo 49.2%
7020 88
0.8% Rather not
41 Ollie 50.7%
1128 60
0.2% Rather not
42▲ 5 Pearl 49.6%
1897 68
0.1% Rather not
43▼ 1 Jae-Yong 50.4%
975 58
0.1% Rather not
44▲ 5 Finx 50.1%
1083 60
0.1% Rather not
45▲ 1 Stu 48.5%
5065 83
0.5% Rather not
46▼ 1 Shade 48.7%
2744 74
0.2% Rather not
47▲ 1 Bolt 49.3%
1476 64
0.3% Rather not
48▼ 5 Nori 49.1%
1683 66
0.0% Rather not
49▲ 1 Cordelius 48.7%
2474 72
0.1% Rather not
50▼ 6 Lou 48.9%
1808 67
0.1% Rather not
51▲ 5 Meg 48.4%
2382 72
0.4% Rather not
52▼ 1 Jessie 48.2%
2301 71
0.2% Rather not
53▲ 1 Trunk 48.3%
1894 68
0.2% Rather not
54▲ 5 Gigi 48.8%
1144 61
0.1% Rather not
55▲ 5 Squeak 47.9%
1823 68
49.7% Rather not
56▼ 3 Bo 47.8%
2152 70
0.3% Rather not
57▲ 1 Leon 47.6%
2387 72
0.2% Rather not
58▼ 6 Tick 47.7%
2078 69
0.2% Rather not
59▼ 4 Sprout 48.1%
1202 61
0.1% Rather not
60▼ 3 Willow 47.0%
1896 68
0.1% Rather not
61 Shelly 46.2%
6953 88
0.4% Rather not
62▲ 3 Kit 46.8%
2248 71
0.1% Rather not
63▲ 5 Otis 46.8%
2105 70
0.2% Rather not
64▼ 2 Pierce 47.1%
1236 62
0.1% Rather not
65▼ 1 Sandy 46.7%
1436 64
0.1% Rather not
66▼ 3 Amber 46.5%
1636 66
0.1% Rather not
67▲ 6 Doug 46.1%
2148 70
0.2% Rather not
68▲ 1 Wendy 59.3%
27 4
0.7% Rather not
69▼ 3 Juju 46.6%
729 54
0.0% Rather not
70▲ 1 R-T 46.0%
961 58
26.2% Rather not
71▼ 4 Colt 44.6%
6180 86
0.6% Rather not
72▼ 2 Buster 45.5%
1269 62
0.1% Rather not
73▼ 1 Lily 44.7%
1336 63
0.1% Rather not
74▲ 4 Berry 44.3%
1292 62
0.1% Rather not
75▼ 1 Glowy 44.2%
965 58
0.1% Rather not
76 Lola 43.8%
1396 64
0.1% Rather not
77▼ 2 Mico 44.0%
910 57
0.1% Rather not
78▲ 2 Kaze 43.5%
1814 67
0.1% Rather not
79 Ruffs 43.6%
1409 64
0.2% Rather not
80▼ 3 Bea 43.0%
2121 70
0.3% Rather not
81▲ 1 Grom 42.5%
1321 63
0.1% Rather not
82▼ 1 Najia 41.9%
749 54
0.1% Rather not
83 Bonnie 41.4%
1434 64
0.2% Rather not
84▲ 3 Ziggy 41.1%
688 53
0.0% Rather not
85▼ 1 Poco 40.6%
3651 78
0.4% Rather not
86 8-Bit 40.6%
2141 70
0.2% Rather not
87▲ 1 Meeple 40.4%
1584 65
0.1% Rather not
88▲ 2 Eve 39.9%
808 55
0.1% Rather not
89▼ 4 Pam 39.6%
1594 65
0.2% Rather not
90▲ 1 Alli 39.5%
860 56
0.2% Rather not
91▼ 2 Janet 39.5%
777 55
0.1% Rather not
92 Brock 38.5%
4103 80
0.4% Rather not
93▲ 1 Penny 38.6%
1828 68
0.2% Rather not
94▲ 3 Belle 38.2%
1057 59
0.2% Rather not
95▲ 1 Nani 37.8%
1776 67
0.1% Rather not
96▼ 3 Byron 37.7%
1359 63
0.2% Rather not
97▼ 2 Gray 37.7%
1226 62
0.1% Rather not
98▲ 1 Mr. P 37.3%
1246 62
0.1% Rather not
99▼ 1 Rosa 36.5%
2694 73
0.2% Rather not
100 Gus 36.2%
1751 67
0.3% Rather not
101 Mandy 34.0%
1284 62
0.2% Rather not
102 Barley 33.2%
2539 72
0.4% Rather not
103 Piper 30.7%
1227 62
0.1% Rather not
104 Gene 27.9%
1168 61
0.1% Rather not
105 Angelo 26.7%
760 54
0.0% Rather not
106 Chuck 24.5%
624 51
0.1% Rather not