
Brawl Ball
260,763 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 74 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 3,620 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 3,620 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (6 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
76.6% | 27327 | 100 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Bolt |
69.8% | 13884 | 98 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
67.3% | 62321 | 100 | 4.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 1 | Ash |
67.1% | 10791 | 94 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▼ 1 | Starr Nova |
65.9% | 30245 | 100 | 1.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Damian |
66.3% | 12595 | 96 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 4 | Trunk |
63.8% | 4998 | 83 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 1 | Pearl |
63.5% | 6409 | 86 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 2 | Gigi |
63.2% | 6394 | 86 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 2 | Lumi |
62.6% | 11779 | 95 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 1 | Shade |
62.4% | 11417 | 95 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | – | Charlie |
62.7% | 4078 | 80 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | – | Doug |
61.6% | 6440 | 86 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | – | R-T |
62.4% | 3193 | 76 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 5 | Jae-Yong |
62.1% | 2267 | 71 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | – | Meeple |
60.3% | 9013 | 91 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 4 | Kaze |
60.1% | 10992 | 94 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 18 | – | Sirius |
60.3% | 8263 | 90 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 5 | Buster |
61.3% | 3034 | 75 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 2 | Ollie |
61.4% | 2789 | 74 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 4 | Pierce |
60.0% | 12015 | 96 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 1 | Sandy |
60.5% | 5954 | 85 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▼ 4 | Moe |
60.2% | 8446 | 90 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 9 | Finx |
61.1% | 3433 | 77 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Mina |
59.0% | 20796 | 100 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | – | Ruffs |
59.6% | 5798 | 85 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▲ 1 | Glowy |
60.0% | 3239 | 76 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 2 | Draco |
59.6% | 4420 | 81 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | – | Otis |
58.5% | 9844 | 93 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▼ 3 | Ziggy |
59.3% | 3282 | 76 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▲ 3 | Gale |
58.3% | 8339 | 90 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | – | Chester |
57.9% | 15164 | 99 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | – | Hank |
58.8% | 4372 | 81 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▼ 3 | Stu |
57.6% | 30994 | 100 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | – | Cordelius |
57.9% | 10689 | 94 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | ▲ 7 | Amber |
58.2% | 3846 | 79 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
58.2% | 2907 | 74 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 38 | ▼ 1 | Clancy |
57.1% | 9729 | 93 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 39 | ▼ 3 | Max |
56.6% | 24872 | 100 | 1.6% | Good pick | ||
| 40 | – | Sam |
57.8% | 3778 | 78 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 41 | – | Willow |
57.4% | 5348 | 84 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 42 | ▼ 3 | Lou |
56.8% | 7914 | 89 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 43 | ▲ 2 | Maisie |
56.9% | 6506 | 87 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 44 | ▼ 2 | Tara |
56.7% | 9321 | 92 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 45 | ▲ 1 | Buzz |
56.2% | 13890 | 98 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 2 | Melodie |
56.3% | 10126 | 93 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 1 | Najia |
57.0% | 3209 | 76 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 1 | Gray |
55.6% | 9252 | 92 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 3 | Bo |
55.5% | 8561 | 91 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
56.2% | 3489 | 77 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 2 | Sprout |
55.6% | 6328 | 86 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▲ 1 | Berry |
55.8% | 4793 | 82 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▲ 1 | Kit |
55.0% | 8021 | 90 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▲ 2 | Lola |
56.1% | 2240 | 71 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Janet |
55.8% | 2012 | 69 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 5 | Griff |
53.4% | 51459 | 100 | 3.3% | Solid | ||
| 57 | – | Pam |
54.8% | 2637 | 73 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 58 | – | Carl |
53.2% | 13519 | 97 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▲ 1 | Squeak |
53.7% | 4643 | 81 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 60 | ▼ 1 | Juju |
55.0% | 1443 | 64 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 61 | – | Eve |
54.8% | 1424 | 64 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 62 | ▲ 7 | Gus |
53.4% | 3770 | 78 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 63 | ▼ 1 | Jacky |
52.9% | 6616 | 87 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 64 | ▼ 1 | Mico |
53.8% | 2289 | 71 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 65 | ▼ 1 | Byron |
52.5% | 7210 | 88 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 66 | ▼ 1 | Lily |
52.4% | 4855 | 82 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 67 | ▲ 1 | Bea |
52.2% | 6136 | 86 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 68 | ▼ 2 | Spike |
51.6% | 14786 | 99 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 69 | ▼ 2 | Jessie |
51.9% | 6494 | 87 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 70 | ▲ 5 | Belle |
52.6% | 2204 | 70 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 1 | Fang |
50.7% | 25761 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 1 | Bonnie |
52.3% | 2107 | 70 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | Gene |
52.0% | 1882 | 68 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 2 | Kenji |
49.5% | 34598 | 100 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 1 | Bull |
49.3% | 24114 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 5 | Mandy |
49.5% | 5142 | 83 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Grom |
50.0% | 2525 | 72 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 5 | Darryl |
48.9% | 13723 | 98 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 6 | Colette |
48.7% | 13189 | 97 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 2 | Chuck |
50.7% | 1051 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 1 | Mortis |
48.1% | 68659 | 100 | 4.4% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 2 | Mr. P |
49.9% | 1827 | 68 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 12 | Meg |
47.8% | 58538 | 100 | 3.7% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 5 | Penny |
48.6% | 5322 | 84 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 4 | Rosa |
48.5% | 4711 | 82 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 2 | Nani |
48.9% | 2725 | 74 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Bibi |
46.6% | 51977 | 100 | 3.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 2 | Piper |
47.2% | 5382 | 84 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 2 | Tick |
46.6% | 12272 | 96 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | Leon |
46.1% | 10126 | 93 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 3 | Surge |
45.5% | 58635 | 100 | 3.7% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Poco |
45.1% | 14055 | 98 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Crow |
44.8% | 21285 | 100 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Emz |
43.7% | 28565 | 100 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | 8-Bit |
43.7% | 14555 | 99 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Frank |
42.4% | 31528 | 100 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 3 | Angelo |
43.5% | 994 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
42.2% | 6738 | 87 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 1 | Dynamike |
40.4% | 33655 | 100 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 1 | Rico |
39.7% | 60027 | 100 | 3.8% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 2 | Brock |
39.3% | 29301 | 100 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Colt |
38.4% | 62330 | 100 | 4.0% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | El Primo |
37.5% | 25248 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Nita |
32.9% | 29042 | 100 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Edgar |
32.6% | 84425 | 100 | 5.4% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Shelly |
26.1% | 47923 | 100 | 3.1% | Rather not |