
Knockout
77,899 battles collected on this map.
MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 54 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,388 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 1,259 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,388 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 1,259 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (66 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Sirius |
62.1% | 5450 | 84 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Sprout |
60.6% | 3681 | 78 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▲ 1 | Grom |
59.3% | 4776 | 82 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 1 | Mico |
58.7% | 5618 | 84 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 5 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
58.3% | 3621 | 78 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 4 | Juju |
58.6% | 2604 | 73 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | – | Spike |
57.4% | 5625 | 84 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 2 | Ziggy |
58.1% | 2237 | 71 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Pierce |
56.9% | 4430 | 81 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 10 | ▲ 2 | Byron |
55.6% | 7060 | 88 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 11 | ▼ 2 | Squeak |
56.1% | 3318 | 76 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 12 | ▲ 5 | Piper |
55.0% | 10122 | 93 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 13 | – | Leon |
54.9% | 9434 | 92 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 14 | ▲ 1 | Mandy |
54.9% | 9105 | 92 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 15 | ▼ 4 | Kit |
54.9% | 8196 | 90 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▼ 2 | Nani |
55.0% | 5558 | 84 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
55.5% | 2152 | 70 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 18 | ▲ 3 | Janet |
55.0% | 2696 | 73 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 19 | ▲ 13 | Tick |
53.7% | 6734 | 87 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Najia |
53.9% | 4513 | 81 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▲ 17 | Edgar |
52.9% | 17628 | 100 | 3.8% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▼ 4 | Meeple |
53.8% | 4131 | 80 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▼ 3 | Gray |
53.6% | 4746 | 82 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▲ 3 | Crow |
53.2% | 7911 | 89 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▲ 57 | Wendy |
70.5% | 105 | 25 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 26 | – | Belle |
53.1% | 4887 | 82 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 5 | Otis |
53.3% | 3467 | 77 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 4 | Bea |
52.8% | 6054 | 85 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 6 | Willow |
53.3% | 3200 | 76 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | Eve |
53.1% | 2308 | 71 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 3 | Charlie |
52.9% | 2472 | 72 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 7 | Lily |
52.1% | 5498 | 84 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▼ 4 | Pearl |
52.5% | 2669 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 34 | ▲ 5 | Surge |
52.0% | 4603 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 35 | ▼ 1 | Bo |
52.1% | 3826 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | ▼ 3 | Bonnie |
52.1% | 3721 | 78 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▲ 4 | Dynamike |
51.4% | 7945 | 90 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
52.1% | 2378 | 71 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | ▼ 4 | Finx |
52.0% | 2442 | 72 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▼ 4 | Mina |
51.7% | 2687 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | ▼ 10 | Mr. P |
51.5% | 3352 | 77 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▲ 12 | Brock |
50.6% | 13604 | 98 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▲ 3 | Berry |
51.4% | 2943 | 75 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▼ 4 | Maisie |
51.1% | 3815 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▲ 15 | Emz |
50.8% | 4726 | 82 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▲ 5 | Griff |
50.6% | 4423 | 81 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▼ 5 | R-T |
51.2% | 2168 | 70 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▲ 4 | Cordelius |
50.5% | 4521 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▲ 7 | Rico |
49.9% | 9707 | 93 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▼ 7 | Gus |
50.1% | 6596 | 87 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 7 | Colette |
50.0% | 6897 | 87 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 3 | Kenji |
50.4% | 3405 | 77 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 9 | Hank |
50.6% | 2617 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 5 | Max |
50.0% | 4934 | 82 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 10 | Chester |
50.0% | 4476 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 6 | Fang |
49.9% | 4690 | 82 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 9 | Moe |
50.7% | 1827 | 68 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 11 | Stu |
49.7% | 6090 | 86 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 6 | Angelo |
49.5% | 5046 | 83 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 7 | Lola |
49.8% | 2893 | 74 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 3 | Carl |
49.3% | 4591 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 6 | Starr Nova |
49.4% | 3835 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 6 | Nori |
49.3% | 3747 | 78 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 5 | Ruffs |
49.4% | 2573 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 4 | Melodie |
49.4% | 2658 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 8 | Shade |
48.9% | 3894 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 1 | Buzz |
48.9% | 3786 | 78 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 5 | Tara |
49.0% | 3183 | 76 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Lumi |
49.2% | 2075 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 3 | Mortis |
48.3% | 7439 | 89 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 3 | Colt |
47.8% | 14840 | 99 | 3.2% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 2 | Amber |
48.8% | 2586 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Bibi |
48.3% | 4054 | 79 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 2 | Buster |
49.0% | 1746 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 4 | Meg |
48.1% | 2681 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 2 | Lou |
48.0% | 2141 | 70 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 2 | Penny |
47.5% | 3991 | 79 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 2 | Ollie |
47.5% | 1526 | 65 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 2 | Gene |
46.7% | 3936 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 1 | Clancy |
46.9% | 1774 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 5 | Draco |
46.9% | 1675 | 66 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 3 | 8-Bit |
45.8% | 5367 | 84 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Darryl |
45.9% | 4638 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | Gigi |
46.6% | 1512 | 65 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 4 | Gale |
45.8% | 2745 | 74 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 2 | Frank |
44.9% | 4698 | 82 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Jessie |
44.6% | 3857 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 2 | Sandy |
44.3% | 2080 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
44.0% | 3466 | 77 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
43.7% | 1748 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
43.5% | 2189 | 70 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 3 | Ash |
43.3% | 1988 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Sam |
43.1% | 2300 | 71 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 2 | Shelly |
40.6% | 9320 | 92 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
40.6% | 2611 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 2 | Barley |
39.9% | 5225 | 83 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 2 | Doug |
39.7% | 2081 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Bolt |
39.0% | 2038 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 2 | Poco |
38.0% | 5542 | 84 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
37.9% | 6312 | 86 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 1 | Trunk |
37.7% | 1722 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▲ 1 | Nita |
37.0% | 5646 | 84 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
36.6% | 1784 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
31.7% | 5431 | 84 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 1 | Jacky |
31.5% | 2462 | 72 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Rosa |
24.9% | 3563 | 78 | 0.8% | Rather not |