
Gem Grab
137,378 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 25 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,407 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 880 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,407 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 880 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (379 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
64.6% | 14608 | 99 | 2.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Wendy |
58.3% | 132335 | 100 | 15.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Bo |
58.3% | 31821 | 100 | 3.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Starr Nova |
57.0% | 12234 | 96 | 2.2% | Good pick | ||
| 5 | – | Clancy |
55.1% | 3137 | 76 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | – | Griff |
53.7% | 35812 | 100 | 3.1% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | – | Damian |
54.7% | 4707 | 82 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | – | Juju |
54.7% | 1736 | 67 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 9 | – | Eve |
53.9% | 2967 | 75 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 10 | ▲ 1 | Nori |
52.3% | 28457 | 100 | 3.5% | Solid | ||
| 11 | – | Mortis |
52.5% | 18729 | 100 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 12 | ▼ 1 | Surge |
52.4% | 21381 | 100 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 13 | ▲ 1 | Mina |
53.6% | 2503 | 72 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Fang |
52.3% | 13172 | 97 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 15 | – | Edgar |
51.5% | 80621 | 100 | 11.1% | Solid | ||
| 16 | – | 8-Bit |
51.5% | 13125 | 97 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 17 | ▲ 1 | Ash |
53.0% | 1191 | 61 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 18 | ▼ 1 | Jessie |
50.9% | 10410 | 94 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 19 | ▲ 2 | Tick |
49.8% | 20182 | 100 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Carl |
50.5% | 4568 | 81 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Shade |
50.7% | 3456 | 77 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 22 | – | Pierce |
50.3% | 5675 | 84 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▲ 2 | Lumi |
51.3% | 1714 | 67 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▲ 3 | Stu |
50.3% | 4806 | 82 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▼ 1 | Bibi |
49.7% | 12136 | 96 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▼ 3 | Emz |
49.3% | 39375 | 100 | 4.1% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Alli |
50.7% | 2604 | 73 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 28 | – | Crow |
48.5% | 24975 | 100 | 2.7% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 1 | Chester |
48.8% | 6022 | 85 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 1 | Doug |
49.6% | 1916 | 68 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 2 | Ruffs |
50.6% | 725 | 54 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 3 | Mico |
49.2% | 2027 | 69 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▼ 1 | Angelo |
49.1% | 1615 | 66 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Janet |
49.2% | 1254 | 62 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Kit |
47.7% | 4151 | 80 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | – | Najia |
47.8% | 2168 | 70 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▲ 4 | Gigi |
48.6% | 952 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | – | Penny |
46.9% | 7079 | 88 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | ▼ 2 | Lily |
47.1% | 4854 | 82 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | – | Sirius |
46.6% | 5250 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | ▼ 2 | Tara |
46.5% | 5577 | 84 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▲ 4 | R-T |
48.4% | 479 | 48 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▲ 1 | Finx |
46.9% | 891 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▼ 1 | Spike |
45.1% | 13647 | 98 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▲ 3 | Meeple |
46.0% | 2020 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
45.3% | 6186 | 86 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | – | Chuck |
46.7% | 830 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▲ 6 | Moe |
46.5% | 776 | 55 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▼ 5 | Nita |
45.1% | 5143 | 83 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 3 | Max |
45.1% | 4456 | 81 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 1 | Rico |
44.3% | 13131 | 97 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 4 | Brock |
44.1% | 20473 | 100 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 1 | Pearl |
45.0% | 2558 | 73 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 3 | Otis |
44.6% | 4635 | 81 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 3 | Leon |
44.0% | 9479 | 92 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 3 | Mandy |
43.6% | 4121 | 80 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 1 | Gray |
43.9% | 1789 | 67 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 1 | Meg |
43.3% | 5087 | 83 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 1 | Poco |
43.3% | 4745 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 1 | Trunk |
44.3% | 766 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 1 | Kenji |
42.7% | 6630 | 87 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 3 | Glowy |
43.7% | 725 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Amber |
43.1% | 2095 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Colt |
42.1% | 14792 | 99 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 3 | Frank |
42.3% | 7428 | 89 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Lola |
43.4% | 698 | 53 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Lou |
42.2% | 2822 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
42.4% | 1634 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 2 | Draco |
42.8% | 587 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 2 | Mr. P |
42.4% | 1006 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 1 | Gus |
41.6% | 1557 | 65 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Ollie |
40.5% | 220 | 36 | 3.6% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 2 | Buzz |
40.6% | 3700 | 78 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 1 | Charlie |
40.8% | 1819 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Sandy |
40.5% | 2662 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Gale |
40.2% | 3725 | 78 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Buster |
39.6% | 412 | 45 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Dynamike |
38.9% | 11038 | 94 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Squeak |
39.0% | 6681 | 87 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 2 | Bea |
39.1% | 3103 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 1 | Byron |
38.8% | 5363 | 84 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 1 | Cordelius |
39.0% | 2835 | 74 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
38.6% | 8470 | 90 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | Sprout |
38.8% | 1077 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Darryl |
38.5% | 3420 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Ziggy |
38.3% | 499 | 48 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Pam |
38.0% | 885 | 57 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 2 | Maisie |
37.8% | 1561 | 65 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
37.2% | 975 | 58 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 5 | Sam |
35.3% | 320 | 41 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 2 | Rosa |
36.8% | 1231 | 62 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
36.8% | 1825 | 68 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Nani |
36.6% | 1467 | 64 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 2 | Larry & Lawrie |
36.3% | 976 | 58 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Willow |
35.6% | 674 | 53 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 1 | Piper |
35.9% | 5862 | 85 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Hank |
34.3% | 434 | 46 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Gene |
34.5% | 1773 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Shelly |
33.9% | 5557 | 84 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Jae-Yong |
28.9% | 228 | 36 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Bonnie |
32.8% | 796 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Grom |
31.8% | 3107 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | El Primo |
30.6% | 3065 | 75 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Jacky |
27.9% | 1274 | 62 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Berry |
26.6% | 2088 | 70 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Barley |
26.5% | 1933 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not |