
Bounty
59,202 battles collected on this map.
MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 51 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,664 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 233 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,664 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 233 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (409 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
75.8% | 1458 | 64 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | ▲ 4 | Bolt |
63.1% | 3578 | 78 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
59.1% | 4372 | 81 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 1 | Tick |
57.8% | 6508 | 87 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 3 | Mandy |
57.1% | 8168 | 90 | 2.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 3 | Bo |
57.6% | 4027 | 79 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 4 | Sprout |
58.0% | 2535 | 72 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 4 | Grom |
57.3% | 4086 | 80 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 2 | Eve |
57.8% | 2220 | 70 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 5 | Belle |
56.4% | 5144 | 83 | 1.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 1 | Juju |
57.5% | 1971 | 69 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 2 | Nani |
56.0% | 5571 | 84 | 1.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 3 | Spike |
55.9% | 5289 | 83 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 2 | Najia |
55.8% | 4123 | 80 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 5 | Pierce |
55.6% | 5191 | 83 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 3 | Piper |
54.6% | 13181 | 97 | 3.7% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 36 | Nori |
55.1% | 4185 | 80 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 1 | Janet |
55.7% | 2100 | 70 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 4 | Penny |
54.8% | 4126 | 80 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 2 | Byron |
53.3% | 8051 | 90 | 2.3% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 2 | Brock |
52.5% | 12149 | 96 | 3.4% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 5 | 8-Bit |
52.8% | 5642 | 84 | 1.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▼ 1 | Leon |
52.3% | 6959 | 88 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 3 | Mr. P |
53.1% | 2906 | 74 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 6 | Edgar |
52.0% | 9262 | 92 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 2 | Carl |
52.6% | 3947 | 79 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 3 | Crow |
52.1% | 6888 | 87 | 1.9% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▼ 3 | Pearl |
53.0% | 2523 | 72 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▲ 1 | Jae-Yong |
53.5% | 1381 | 63 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▲ 4 | Ziggy |
53.3% | 1502 | 65 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▲ 4 | Angelo |
52.1% | 4057 | 79 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 3 | Mico |
52.2% | 2745 | 74 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 3 | Sirius |
52.1% | 2938 | 75 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 11 | Meeple |
51.9% | 3311 | 76 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 8 | Gray |
51.6% | 3750 | 78 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 3 | Mortis |
51.2% | 5195 | 83 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Fang |
51.3% | 4239 | 80 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 12 | Bonnie |
51.5% | 3112 | 76 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 13 | Mina |
51.9% | 2036 | 69 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 2 | Ruffs |
51.8% | 1859 | 68 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | R-T |
51.8% | 1751 | 67 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 10 | Emz |
51.0% | 3710 | 78 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 11 | Larry & Lawrie |
51.3% | 2465 | 72 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Lola |
51.4% | 2175 | 70 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 6 | Bea |
50.3% | 6527 | 87 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 18 | Starr Nova |
50.4% | 2884 | 74 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 1 | Griff |
50.1% | 3551 | 77 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 2 | Moe |
51.1% | 1213 | 61 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 7 | Jessie |
49.9% | 3482 | 77 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 10 | Charlie |
50.6% | 1744 | 67 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 4 | Lily |
49.5% | 3931 | 79 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 3 | Finx |
50.1% | 1880 | 68 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 3 | Max |
49.4% | 3630 | 78 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▲ 1 | Lumi |
50.0% | 1630 | 66 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▲ 2 | Gus |
48.9% | 5435 | 84 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▲ 6 | Kaze |
49.3% | 2229 | 71 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▲ 2 | Kit |
48.8% | 4323 | 80 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▼ 10 | Colette |
48.4% | 4730 | 82 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▼ 5 | Otis |
48.6% | 2634 | 73 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 60 | – | Clancy |
49.1% | 1150 | 61 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 61 | ▼ 5 | Maisie |
48.2% | 2773 | 74 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 62 | ▼ 1 | Gene |
48.0% | 3386 | 77 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 63 | ▲ 3 | Amber |
48.3% | 2166 | 70 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 64 | ▲ 4 | Glowy |
48.5% | 1521 | 65 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 65 | ▼ 7 | Rico |
47.2% | 6266 | 86 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 3 | Colt |
46.9% | 11080 | 95 | 3.1% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 2 | Stu |
47.5% | 3783 | 78 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 3 | Surge |
47.1% | 3439 | 77 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 2 | Kenji |
46.6% | 2149 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 4 | Chester |
46.5% | 2650 | 73 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 4 | Willow |
46.3% | 1757 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 1 | Meg |
46.0% | 2288 | 71 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 3 | Lou |
46.1% | 1900 | 68 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 8 | Gigi |
45.8% | 1180 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 3 | Alli |
45.4% | 1934 | 68 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 5 | Berry |
45.4% | 1743 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 1 | Dynamike |
44.3% | 4934 | 82 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 6 | Tara |
44.6% | 2254 | 71 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 10 | Shade |
43.8% | 2179 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 5 | Draco |
44.4% | 786 | 55 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 6 | Damian |
43.9% | 936 | 58 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 3 | Buster |
43.5% | 1162 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Sandy |
43.0% | 1410 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 4 | Pam |
42.5% | 2066 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 8 | Melodie |
42.5% | 1646 | 66 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 5 | Frank |
41.7% | 1989 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 5 | Bibi |
41.7% | 2133 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 2 | Gale |
41.5% | 1940 | 68 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 5 | Cordelius |
41.3% | 2159 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Buzz |
41.1% | 2214 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 3 | Ash |
40.9% | 1258 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 5 | Hank |
40.9% | 1291 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Sam |
40.9% | 1096 | 60 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 3 | Poco |
40.5% | 3697 | 78 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 3 | Chuck |
40.7% | 1156 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 2 | Darryl |
40.1% | 2527 | 72 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 2 | Barley |
39.9% | 3442 | 77 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 17 | Ollie |
39.9% | 933 | 57 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Trunk |
38.7% | 975 | 58 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Doug |
36.7% | 1190 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Nita |
34.5% | 3222 | 76 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Shelly |
34.0% | 3935 | 79 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Jacky |
32.3% | 1467 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Bull |
30.9% | 2911 | 75 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | El Primo |
30.7% | 2687 | 73 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Rosa |
29.6% | 2243 | 71 | 0.6% | Rather not |