
Brawl Ball
233,623 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 56 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 7,279 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 7,279 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (1 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
72.8% | 16899 | 100 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Nori |
64.0% | 37116 | 100 | 3.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Damian |
62.6% | 16604 | 100 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Starr Nova |
61.5% | 21115 | 100 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Ash |
61.5% | 12478 | 96 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 1 | Lumi |
60.3% | 9908 | 93 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | ▼ 1 | Shade |
59.5% | 24068 | 100 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | – | Sirius |
59.1% | 10504 | 94 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 1 | Trunk |
59.1% | 8886 | 91 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 1 | Hank |
58.2% | 9449 | 92 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
58.0% | 7506 | 89 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Willow |
57.4% | 10284 | 93 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 13 | – | Moe |
57.3% | 6580 | 87 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 14 | – | Doug |
56.8% | 12620 | 96 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 15 | – | Gigi |
57.1% | 6050 | 85 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 16 | – | Clancy |
56.3% | 7667 | 89 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 17 | ▲ 1 | Ziggy |
56.6% | 4164 | 80 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 18 | ▼ 1 | Jacky |
55.5% | 13432 | 97 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 19 | ▲ 5 | Lou |
55.9% | 5899 | 85 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▲ 3 | Meg |
55.4% | 10711 | 94 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▼ 2 | Juju |
56.2% | 3395 | 77 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▲ 7 | Bolt |
55.5% | 6966 | 88 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▼ 3 | Gale |
55.1% | 9866 | 93 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▲ 3 | Draco |
55.3% | 5712 | 85 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▲ 5 | Cordelius |
54.5% | 13303 | 97 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▲ 9 | Ollie |
55.3% | 3861 | 79 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▲ 4 | Jae-Yong |
55.6% | 2713 | 73 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 3 | Mina |
54.3% | 14108 | 98 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 3 | Buzz |
54.2% | 17916 | 100 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 3 | Berry |
54.6% | 6685 | 87 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 9 | Griff |
53.8% | 31979 | 100 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 2 | Otis |
54.4% | 6538 | 87 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 9 | Pierce |
54.4% | 5642 | 84 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 6 | Kenji |
53.5% | 28302 | 100 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 1 | Melodie |
54.1% | 7391 | 88 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 1 | Sam |
54.1% | 6450 | 86 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 5 | Tara |
53.9% | 9209 | 92 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 17 | Bibi |
53.0% | 63624 | 100 | 4.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 1 | Charlie |
54.3% | 3694 | 78 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 6 | Ruffs |
53.9% | 5447 | 84 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Max |
53.2% | 15674 | 100 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 3 | R-T |
54.0% | 3710 | 78 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 4 | Maisie |
53.4% | 7747 | 89 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 1 | Sandy |
53.4% | 6307 | 86 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 5 | Chester |
52.5% | 13937 | 98 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 2 | Meeple |
52.7% | 7672 | 89 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 5 | Pearl |
52.8% | 5742 | 85 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▲ 6 | Kaze |
52.5% | 8168 | 90 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | – | Stu |
52.1% | 21112 | 100 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▼ 3 | Sprout |
52.6% | 6644 | 87 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 13 | Emz |
51.6% | 26759 | 100 | 2.3% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 8 | Frank |
51.2% | 34834 | 100 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 2 | Fang |
51.4% | 16648 | 100 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 1 | Buster |
51.8% | 4225 | 80 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 2 | Carl |
50.1% | 12396 | 96 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 6 | Bo |
50.1% | 6623 | 87 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 3 | Kit |
49.9% | 8821 | 91 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 2 | Bull |
49.3% | 38152 | 100 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 4 | Spike |
49.1% | 15942 | 100 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 2 | Surge |
48.8% | 45717 | 100 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Darryl |
48.6% | 16698 | 100 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 3 | Dynamike |
48.2% | 45480 | 100 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 2 | Amber |
49.2% | 3996 | 79 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
48.9% | 5041 | 83 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 1 | Colette |
48.3% | 10039 | 93 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Glowy |
48.9% | 2718 | 73 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 1 | Mico |
48.2% | 3841 | 79 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | El Primo |
46.6% | 32987 | 100 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 3 | Lily |
47.2% | 6086 | 86 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 1 | Mortis |
46.4% | 47753 | 100 | 3.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 2 | Finx |
47.5% | 2724 | 74 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
46.2% | 13838 | 98 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 3 | Tick |
46.0% | 13815 | 98 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Alli |
46.5% | 3613 | 78 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 1 | Najia |
46.3% | 2555 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 1 | Grom |
45.7% | 4637 | 81 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 2 | Leon |
44.9% | 8260 | 90 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 2 | Jessie |
44.5% | 7510 | 89 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 2 | Rosa |
43.9% | 9608 | 92 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 1 | Rico |
43.3% | 50139 | 100 | 4.5% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 3 | Nita |
43.3% | 30823 | 100 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Gray |
43.8% | 5067 | 83 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Crow |
41.8% | 13424 | 97 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
41.4% | 12812 | 97 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 2 | Byron |
41.5% | 4012 | 79 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Lola |
41.6% | 2826 | 74 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 3 | Edgar |
40.4% | 78541 | 100 | 8.6% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Penny |
41.1% | 5752 | 85 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 3 | Bea |
40.0% | 4578 | 81 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | 8-Bit |
39.3% | 10121 | 93 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 3 | Mandy |
39.5% | 4140 | 80 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 7 | Bonnie |
39.4% | 2941 | 75 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 3 | Nani |
39.3% | 4139 | 80 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
39.3% | 3959 | 79 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 3 | Janet |
39.3% | 2073 | 69 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 6 | Eve |
39.2% | 1789 | 67 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 2 | Colt |
38.3% | 35013 | 100 | 3.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Mr. P |
39.0% | 3106 | 75 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 10 | Shelly |
37.6% | 43678 | 100 | 4.3% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 1 | Gus |
38.0% | 4481 | 81 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 1 | Brock |
36.8% | 18967 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Belle |
35.0% | 2337 | 71 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Gene |
32.1% | 2742 | 74 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Piper |
32.0% | 3065 | 75 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Chuck |
28.5% | 1693 | 66 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Angelo |
27.4% | 1625 | 66 | 0.1% | Rather not |