
Knockout
77,916 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 54 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,629 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 1,575 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,629 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 1,575 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (40 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Sirius |
62.0% | 5430 | 84 | 0.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Sprout |
60.6% | 3684 | 78 | 0.0% | Good pick | ||
| 3 | ▲ 1 | Grom |
59.3% | 4780 | 82 | 0.0% | Good pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 1 | Mico |
58.7% | 5616 | 84 | 0.0% | Good pick | ||
| 5 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
58.3% | 3624 | 78 | 0.0% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 4 | Juju |
58.6% | 2606 | 73 | 0.0% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | – | Spike |
57.4% | 5623 | 84 | 0.0% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 2 | Ziggy |
58.1% | 2237 | 71 | 0.0% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Pierce |
56.9% | 4436 | 81 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 10 | ▼ 2 | Squeak |
56.2% | 3314 | 76 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 11 | ▲ 2 | Byron |
55.5% | 7060 | 88 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 12 | ▲ 5 | Piper |
55.1% | 10125 | 93 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 13 | – | Leon |
54.9% | 9428 | 92 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 14 | – | Mandy |
54.9% | 9099 | 92 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 15 | ▼ 4 | Kit |
54.9% | 8185 | 90 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
55.0% | 5558 | 84 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
55.5% | 2154 | 70 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 18 | ▲ 4 | Janet |
55.0% | 2698 | 73 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 19 | ▲ 13 | Tick |
53.7% | 6698 | 87 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Najia |
53.9% | 4512 | 81 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▼ 4 | Meeple |
53.8% | 4133 | 80 | 7.0% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▲ 17 | Edgar |
52.9% | 17594 | 100 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▼ 3 | Gray |
53.7% | 4749 | 82 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▲ 3 | Crow |
53.3% | 7910 | 89 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▲ 57 | Wendy |
69.8% | 106 | 25 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 26 | – | Belle |
53.1% | 4890 | 82 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 6 | Willow |
53.4% | 3198 | 76 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 5 | Otis |
53.3% | 3470 | 77 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 4 | Bea |
52.8% | 6067 | 85 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | Eve |
53.0% | 2312 | 71 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 3 | Charlie |
52.9% | 2472 | 72 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 8 | Lily |
52.1% | 5498 | 84 | 9.4% | Rather not | ||
| 33 | ▼ 4 | Pearl |
52.5% | 2668 | 73 | 4.5% | Rather not | ||
| 34 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
52.1% | 3727 | 78 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 35 | ▲ 4 | Surge |
51.9% | 4602 | 81 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | ▼ 2 | Bo |
52.1% | 3833 | 79 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▲ 4 | Dynamike |
51.4% | 7944 | 90 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
52.1% | 2381 | 72 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | ▼ 4 | Finx |
52.0% | 2444 | 72 | 4.2% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▼ 4 | Mina |
51.7% | 2688 | 73 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | ▼ 10 | Mr. P |
51.4% | 3354 | 77 | 5.7% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▲ 14 | Brock |
50.5% | 13611 | 98 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▲ 2 | Berry |
51.5% | 2947 | 75 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▼ 4 | Maisie |
51.1% | 3817 | 79 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▲ 14 | Emz |
50.8% | 4718 | 82 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▲ 5 | Griff |
50.6% | 4415 | 81 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▼ 4 | R-T |
51.2% | 2168 | 70 | 3.7% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▲ 4 | Cordelius |
50.4% | 4525 | 81 | 7.7% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▼ 7 | Gus |
50.2% | 6606 | 87 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 7 | Rico |
49.9% | 9719 | 93 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 7 | Colette |
50.0% | 6898 | 87 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 3 | Kenji |
50.4% | 3408 | 77 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 9 | Hank |
50.6% | 2620 | 73 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 8 | Chester |
50.1% | 4476 | 81 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 6 | Max |
49.9% | 4943 | 82 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 6 | Fang |
49.9% | 4694 | 82 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 9 | Moe |
50.7% | 1827 | 68 | 3.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 11 | Stu |
49.6% | 6095 | 86 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 5 | Angelo |
49.6% | 5051 | 83 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 7 | Lola |
49.8% | 2896 | 74 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 7 | Starr Nova |
49.5% | 3833 | 79 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 3 | Carl |
49.3% | 4597 | 81 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 9 | Nori |
49.4% | 3742 | 78 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 4 | Ruffs |
49.4% | 2576 | 73 | 4.4% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 4 | Melodie |
49.4% | 2659 | 73 | 4.5% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 8 | Shade |
49.0% | 3895 | 79 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 1 | Buzz |
48.9% | 3784 | 78 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 5 | Tara |
49.0% | 3185 | 76 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Lumi |
49.2% | 2075 | 69 | 3.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 3 | Mortis |
48.2% | 7438 | 89 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 2 | Amber |
48.9% | 2585 | 73 | 4.4% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 3 | Colt |
47.8% | 14832 | 99 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Bibi |
48.3% | 4057 | 79 | 6.9% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 2 | Buster |
48.9% | 1750 | 67 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 4 | Meg |
48.2% | 2686 | 73 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 1 | Penny |
47.5% | 3994 | 79 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 1 | Lou |
47.9% | 2141 | 70 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 1 | Gene |
46.8% | 3938 | 79 | 6.7% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 1 | Ollie |
47.5% | 1528 | 65 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 4 | Draco |
46.9% | 1679 | 66 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 2 | Clancy |
46.9% | 1775 | 67 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 3 | 8-Bit |
45.8% | 5376 | 84 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Darryl |
45.9% | 4641 | 81 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | Gigi |
46.6% | 1510 | 65 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 4 | Gale |
45.8% | 2749 | 74 | 4.7% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 2 | Frank |
44.8% | 4690 | 82 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Jessie |
44.7% | 3862 | 79 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 2 | Sandy |
44.3% | 2082 | 69 | 3.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
44.0% | 3469 | 77 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
43.8% | 1748 | 67 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
43.4% | 2194 | 70 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 3 | Ash |
43.3% | 1997 | 69 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Sam |
43.1% | 2300 | 71 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 2 | Shelly |
40.6% | 9329 | 92 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
40.5% | 2618 | 73 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 2 | Barley |
39.9% | 5232 | 83 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 2 | Doug |
39.7% | 2081 | 69 | 3.5% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Bolt |
39.0% | 2037 | 69 | 3.5% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 2 | Poco |
38.0% | 5550 | 84 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
37.9% | 6319 | 86 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 1 | Trunk |
37.7% | 1720 | 67 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▲ 1 | Nita |
37.0% | 5652 | 84 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
36.5% | 1787 | 67 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
31.7% | 5436 | 84 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 1 | Jacky |
31.5% | 2463 | 72 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Rosa |
24.9% | 3564 | 78 | 0.0% | Rather not |