
Bounty
170,287 battles collected on this map — ranked only.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 43 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 5,925 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 498 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 5,925 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 498 real line-ups from a different rank tier, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (832 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here. The numbers also come from the solo queue: the battles behind them were fought by three strangers, not a practised team.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
64.3% | 4663 | 82 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Tick |
59.5% | 41220 | 100 | 4.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Doug |
58.7% | 3268 | 76 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Penny |
57.0% | 8456 | 90 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 1 | Mr. P |
56.7% | 2582 | 73 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 1 | Mico |
55.4% | 6798 | 87 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▼ 2 | Carl |
55.4% | 5052 | 83 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | R-T |
57.9% | 939 | 58 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Grom |
54.5% | 7744 | 89 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Bo |
54.1% | 13393 | 97 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Lily |
53.8% | 16756 | 100 | 1.9% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 1 | Gray |
54.3% | 4753 | 82 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Edgar |
53.0% | 110963 | 100 | 12.7% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 1 | Surge |
53.0% | 17160 | 100 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 1 | Brock |
52.7% | 36122 | 100 | 4.1% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 2 | Pearl |
54.0% | 2677 | 73 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 1 | Meeple |
53.0% | 9240 | 92 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 1 | Mina |
53.7% | 3115 | 76 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 3 | Buster |
59.2% | 326 | 42 | 0.0% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
53.0% | 4976 | 83 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Griff |
52.0% | 23012 | 100 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Shade |
51.8% | 14431 | 98 | 1.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Mortis |
51.3% | 23392 | 100 | 2.7% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Gigi |
53.4% | 1357 | 63 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Bibi |
51.7% | 6648 | 87 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | – | Sprout |
52.0% | 3485 | 77 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 27 | – | Cordelius |
51.7% | 4752 | 82 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 2 | Janet |
54.1% | 749 | 54 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 29 | – | Dynamike |
50.7% | 15850 | 100 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | Starr Nova |
50.5% | 14102 | 98 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 31 | – | Sam |
54.8% | 456 | 47 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 2 | Najia |
50.6% | 6513 | 87 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Ash |
51.7% | 1730 | 67 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Spike |
50.1% | 12497 | 96 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Squeak |
50.3% | 8416 | 90 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 1 | Mandy |
49.8% | 8034 | 90 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 1 | Ruffs |
51.3% | 1268 | 62 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 3 | Buzz |
50.2% | 3089 | 75 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Chester |
49.8% | 5034 | 83 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 1 | Fang |
49.4% | 7797 | 89 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 4 | Alli |
50.1% | 2769 | 74 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 2 | Chuck |
52.5% | 526 | 49 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 2 | Rico |
48.8% | 24368 | 100 | 2.8% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 4 | Damian |
50.5% | 1659 | 66 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Willow |
48.6% | 33261 | 100 | 3.8% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 3 | Rosa |
50.6% | 1465 | 64 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 2 | Emz |
48.6% | 24748 | 100 | 2.8% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 6 | Bull |
49.4% | 4559 | 81 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 1 | Stu |
49.2% | 5660 | 84 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 1 | 8-Bit |
48.7% | 11951 | 96 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 3 | Sirius |
49.0% | 5808 | 85 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 1 | Kit |
48.7% | 7966 | 90 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 1 | Trunk |
48.1% | 15210 | 99 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 54 | – | Nori |
47.6% | 90018 | 100 | 10.3% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Maisie |
49.8% | 1234 | 62 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 56 | – | Ziggy |
49.1% | 1804 | 67 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▼ 1 | Leon |
47.8% | 11835 | 95 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▲ 1 | Moe |
50.5% | 614 | 51 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▲ 2 | Juju |
49.2% | 1125 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Poco |
48.5% | 2046 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 7 | Hank |
48.7% | 1356 | 63 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 2 | Ollie |
52.4% | 210 | 35 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Pierce |
47.4% | 7279 | 88 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 1 | Gus |
47.7% | 3500 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 5 | Darryl |
47.9% | 2218 | 70 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 2 | Jessie |
47.5% | 3485 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 2 | Kenji |
47.1% | 6036 | 85 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | Gale |
47.9% | 1580 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 4 | Clancy |
48.3% | 812 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Byron |
46.4% | 8791 | 91 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
47.2% | 2101 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Belle |
46.9% | 2394 | 72 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 2 | Nani |
46.5% | 2544 | 72 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 2 | Crow |
45.5% | 12580 | 96 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 3 | Lumi |
46.5% | 1805 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 1 | Piper |
45.4% | 11037 | 94 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 1 | Jacky |
46.7% | 824 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 1 | Eve |
46.9% | 667 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 2 | Angelo |
46.5% | 1011 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Finx |
46.8% | 609 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Nita |
44.9% | 3363 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Jae-Yong |
46.8% | 269 | 39 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
43.9% | 2264 | 71 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 1 | Meg |
43.5% | 2773 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 2 | Draco |
44.4% | 358 | 43 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 1 | Colt |
42.7% | 13489 | 97 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 1 | Max |
43.1% | 4659 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Bea |
42.9% | 3372 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 1 | Sandy |
43.2% | 923 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Kaze |
41.6% | 34752 | 100 | 4.0% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | El Primo |
42.4% | 2473 | 72 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
42.2% | 1598 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 2 | Lou |
42.1% | 1143 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 2 | Colette |
41.4% | 5038 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
41.9% | 515 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 1 | Charlie |
41.9% | 922 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 3 | Glowy |
41.8% | 655 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Gene |
41.5% | 1498 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Shelly |
40.4% | 5494 | 84 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Pam |
40.9% | 567 | 50 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Frank |
40.2% | 4132 | 80 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▲ 1 | Tara |
40.2% | 2166 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Amber |
39.2% | 1152 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Bonnie |
38.6% | 715 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Melodie |
32.4% | 578 | 50 | 0.1% | Rather not |