
Brawl Ball
55,393 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 40 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
Nothing noticeably underrated.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 3,706 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 3,706 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (303 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bibi |
63.2% | 14404 | 98 | 4.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Emz |
61.2% | 5727 | 85 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Frank |
60.0% | 9828 | 93 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 4 | – | Edgar |
59.5% | 10669 | 94 | 3.2% | Good pick | ||
| 5 | – | Griff |
59.2% | 6541 | 87 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | – | Spike |
57.8% | 4453 | 81 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | – | Clancy |
57.1% | 2658 | 73 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 8 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
56.5% | 4359 | 81 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
56.5% | 2841 | 74 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 10 | – | Kenji |
55.6% | 4827 | 82 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 11 | – | Gale |
55.6% | 4106 | 80 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 12 | – | Surge |
53.9% | 6851 | 87 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 13 | – | Tara |
54.1% | 3553 | 77 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 14 | ▲ 3 | Hank |
54.1% | 2623 | 73 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 15 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
53.8% | 2911 | 75 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
53.9% | 2668 | 73 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Max |
53.3% | 4069 | 80 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 18 | – | Bull |
52.3% | 11492 | 95 | 3.5% | Solid | ||
| 19 | ▲ 1 | Jacky |
52.6% | 4852 | 82 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Dynamike |
52.3% | 5755 | 85 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▲ 2 | Fang |
51.9% | 4662 | 82 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 22 | ▼ 1 | Buzz |
51.8% | 5009 | 83 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 23 | ▼ 1 | Nita |
51.6% | 6730 | 87 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 24 | ▲ 1 | Sam |
52.1% | 2496 | 72 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 25 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
51.2% | 6282 | 86 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 26 | – | Draco |
52.1% | 1850 | 68 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 27 | – | Cordelius |
51.3% | 3649 | 78 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 28 | ▲ 5 | Doug |
51.2% | 3494 | 77 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 29 | ▲ 2 | El Primo |
50.5% | 9418 | 92 | 2.8% | Rather not | ||
| 30 | ▲ 2 | Shade |
51.0% | 3884 | 79 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 31 | ▼ 3 | Trunk |
51.3% | 2687 | 73 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 32 | ▼ 3 | Ollie |
52.2% | 1323 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 33 | ▲ 2 | Crow |
51.0% | 3259 | 76 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 34 | ▲ 2 | Rico |
50.1% | 7334 | 88 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 35 | ▼ 5 | Starr Nova |
50.7% | 2974 | 75 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | ▼ 2 | Pearl |
50.8% | 2197 | 70 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▲ 6 | Nori |
50.8% | 1832 | 68 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
51.5% | 1007 | 59 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | – | Chester |
49.8% | 4512 | 81 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▼ 2 | Maisie |
50.2% | 2765 | 74 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | – | Colette |
49.7% | 4203 | 80 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▼ 2 | Larry & Lawrie |
50.1% | 1949 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▼ 1 | Mortis |
48.7% | 8021 | 90 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▲ 1 | Wendy |
74.4% | 39 | 10 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▲ 1 | Lumi |
49.5% | 1737 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▼ 2 | Shelly |
48.1% | 9636 | 92 | 2.9% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | – | Lou |
49.2% | 1821 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▲ 2 | Bo |
48.9% | 2305 | 71 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▲ 2 | Carl |
48.5% | 3397 | 77 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▼ 1 | Buster |
48.9% | 1719 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 3 | Moe |
49.0% | 1457 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 3 | Mina |
48.3% | 2367 | 71 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
48.1% | 2180 | 70 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | – | Tick |
48.0% | 2263 | 71 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 2 | Kit |
47.6% | 2581 | 73 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | – | Squeak |
47.5% | 1962 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 3 | Willow |
47.3% | 2349 | 71 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 4 | Gigi |
47.7% | 1335 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 1 | R-T |
47.7% | 1184 | 61 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 7 | Charlie |
47.4% | 1226 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Stu |
46.3% | 4930 | 82 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Berry |
46.9% | 1630 | 66 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 4 | Leon |
46.5% | 2625 | 73 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 2 | Jessie |
46.2% | 2548 | 73 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 3 | Meg |
45.9% | 2774 | 74 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 1 | Bolt |
46.0% | 1812 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 4 | Juju |
46.4% | 890 | 57 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 1 | Pierce |
46.2% | 1085 | 60 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 3 | Amber |
45.7% | 1799 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 6 | Sprout |
45.5% | 1344 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 4 | Sandy |
45.2% | 1774 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 2 | Ziggy |
44.8% | 802 | 55 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 6 | Finx |
43.6% | 1086 | 60 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 3 | Ruffs |
43.4% | 1446 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 2 | Lily |
43.2% | 1799 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Kaze |
43.0% | 2107 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 3 | Colt |
42.3% | 6235 | 86 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 3 | Glowy |
42.9% | 952 | 58 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Mico |
41.1% | 1179 | 61 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 1 | Meeple |
40.8% | 1499 | 65 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 1 | Alli |
40.6% | 1292 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Rosa |
39.7% | 4137 | 80 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
39.8% | 1511 | 65 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
39.0% | 1931 | 68 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Grom |
38.5% | 1559 | 65 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 2 | 8-Bit |
37.1% | 2283 | 71 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Brock |
36.9% | 4285 | 80 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 2 | Eve |
36.8% | 880 | 57 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Pam |
36.8% | 1786 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 3 | Penny |
36.3% | 1943 | 68 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Poco |
35.9% | 3985 | 79 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Bonnie |
35.3% | 1413 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 6 | Janet |
34.8% | 788 | 55 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 1 | Byron |
34.8% | 1337 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 2 | Nani |
34.8% | 1966 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Belle |
33.9% | 1061 | 59 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▲ 1 | Gray |
33.9% | 1224 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Mandy |
33.8% | 1460 | 64 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 5 | Najia |
33.0% | 705 | 53 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Mr. P |
33.6% | 1335 | 63 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Barley |
32.5% | 3103 | 75 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Gus |
32.3% | 1754 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Gene |
28.8% | 1280 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 1 | Chuck |
25.3% | 779 | 55 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▲ 1 | Angelo |
24.9% | 768 | 55 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 2 | Piper |
25.8% | 1195 | 61 | 0.4% | Rather not |