Hot Zone
Open Business
175,213 battles collected on this map — ranked only.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 35 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
Recommendation for Gold
Long rounds Median 101 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. An early lead is rarely enough; the round is long enough to claw it back.
What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean
Hidden gems & traps
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
If you queue as three
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,783 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 421 real line-ups.
How these numbers are arrived at
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,783 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 421 real line-ups from a different rank tier, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (1,542 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here. The numbers also come from the solo queue: the battles behind them were fought by three strangers, not a practised team.
All brawlers on this map
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Tick |
61.2% | 43288 | 100 | 4.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Bolt |
62.3% | 4912 | 82 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Jessie |
58.2% | 11136 | 95 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Bo |
57.5% | 53630 | 100 | 5.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Doug |
58.2% | 7251 | 88 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Kenji |
56.7% | 10972 | 94 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Griff |
56.2% | 40358 | 100 | 4.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Bibi |
56.2% | 15531 | 100 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Chuck |
56.8% | 4634 | 81 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Sandy |
56.7% | 3118 | 76 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Hank |
56.5% | 2255 | 71 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | – | Poco |
55.0% | 6724 | 87 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Clancy |
56.0% | 2373 | 71 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Damian |
54.5% | 5520 | 84 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Ash |
55.1% | 2608 | 73 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Mortis |
53.3% | 17430 | 100 | 1.9% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Penny |
53.3% | 17392 | 100 | 1.9% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Starr Nova |
53.3% | 11914 | 96 | 1.3% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Surge |
53.0% | 17348 | 100 | 1.9% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Emz |
52.2% | 69420 | 100 | 7.7% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Stu |
52.9% | 6771 | 87 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Edgar |
51.6% | 77813 | 100 | 8.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Mina |
53.0% | 3685 | 78 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Bull |
52.6% | 6028 | 85 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Draco |
53.4% | 1820 | 67 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | – | Frank |
51.5% | 17909 | 100 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | – | Lou |
51.7% | 10286 | 93 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | – | Buster |
55.4% | 547 | 49 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | – | Fang |
51.3% | 13516 | 97 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | – | Trunk |
50.7% | 34804 | 100 | 3.9% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | – | Gale |
51.0% | 4010 | 79 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Nita |
50.6% | 6375 | 86 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Berry |
50.7% | 5676 | 84 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Meg |
50.4% | 7664 | 89 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Chester |
49.9% | 6377 | 86 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 36 | – | Sam |
53.7% | 432 | 46 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Nori |
48.4% | 64921 | 100 | 7.2% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Gray |
49.4% | 2328 | 71 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Finx |
49.1% | 2815 | 74 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Spike |
47.9% | 16190 | 100 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – |  8-Bit |
47.6% | 18442 | 100 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – |  Tara |
48.2% | 4159 | 80 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 43 | – |  Carl |
48.2% | 3422 | 77 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – |  Moe |
49.9% | 531 | 49 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – |  Sirius |
47.3% | 5716 | 85 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 46 | – |  R-T |
48.6% | 937 | 58 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – |  Pam |
47.8% | 1757 | 67 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – |  Barley |
46.6% | 5259 | 83 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – |  Dynamike |
46.0% | 16848 | 100 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – |  Pierce |
46.3% | 7471 | 89 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 51 | – |  Ollie |
50.5% | 192 | 34 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 52 | – |  Maisie |
47.5% | 1156 | 61 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 53 | – |  Jacky |
47.3% | 1219 | 61 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 54 | – |  Otis |
46.6% | 2783 | 74 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – |  Lumi |
45.8% | 4768 | 82 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 56 | – |  Pearl |
46.0% | 2407 | 72 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 57 | – |  Grom |
45.8% | 3029 | 75 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 58 | – |  Darryl |
46.1% | 2053 | 69 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 59 | – |  Gigi |
46.4% | 771 | 55 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 60 | – |  El Primo |
44.6% | 3899 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – |  Mico |
45.4% | 1037 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – |  Cordelius |
44.9% | 1902 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – |  Ziggy |
45.2% | 1291 | 62 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – |  Glowy |
45.1% | 1239 | 62 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – |  Buzz |
44.4% | 2505 | 72 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – |  Janet |
45.4% | 370 | 44 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – |  Crow |
43.4% | 11742 | 95 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – |  Juju |
45.2% | 356 | 43 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – |  Amber |
43.7% | 2441 | 72 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – |  Ruffs |
43.8% | 1162 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – |  Shade |
43.2% | 3653 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – |  Rosa |
43.6% | 1102 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – |  Meeple |
42.9% | 3406 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – |  Colette |
42.4% | 6107 | 86 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – |  Najia |
42.7% | 1646 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – |  Kaze |
41.3% | 30696 | 100 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – |  Lola |
42.4% | 451 | 47 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – |  Larry & Lawrie |
41.9% | 1898 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – |  Lily |
41.8% | 1521 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – |  Kit |
41.5% | 1842 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – |  Mr. P |
41.1% | 799 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – |  Willow |
39.7% | 27227 | 100 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – |  Jae-Yong |
39.2% | 250 | 38 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – |  Squeak |
39.5% | 8570 | 91 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – |  Sprout |
39.8% | 1688 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – |  Colt |
39.0% | 9087 | 92 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – |  Brock |
38.6% | 16209 | 100 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – |  Rico |
38.5% | 10268 | 93 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – |  Bea |
39.0% | 1641 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – |  Melodie |
38.9% | 866 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – |  Max |
38.2% | 3463 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – |  Gus |
38.3% | 1019 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – |  Charlie |
37.3% | 740 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – |  Eve |
34.4% | 450 | 47 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – |  Alli |
32.4% | 253 | 38 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – |  Mandy |
35.5% | 1883 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – |  Shelly |
35.2% | 4895 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – |  Nani |
34.9% | 834 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – |  Belle |
35.0% | 984 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – |  Leon |
35.2% | 3037 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – |  Byron |
33.9% | 3234 | 76 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – |  Angelo |
27.6% | 228 | 36 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – |  Piper |
28.5% | 2248 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – |  Bonnie |
21.9% | 543 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – |  Gene |
22.3% | 655 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not |