
Hot Zone
73,238 battles collected on this map.
MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 53 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 5,616 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 489 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 5,616 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 489 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (246 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
76.5% | 9213 | 92 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Nori |
68.6% | 12797 | 97 | 2.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Bolt |
69.1% | 4326 | 80 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Doug |
68.1% | 4070 | 80 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Damian |
67.6% | 3099 | 75 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Starr Nova |
65.9% | 5090 | 83 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Draco |
65.5% | 2181 | 70 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 1 | Bo |
62.5% | 11365 | 95 | 2.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
63.8% | 1881 | 68 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 3 | Trunk |
63.3% | 2093 | 70 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
61.5% | 4811 | 82 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 3 | Finx |
62.1% | 2023 | 69 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 8 | R-T |
62.8% | 1078 | 60 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | – | Chester |
60.6% | 2592 | 73 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 4 | Lumi |
60.4% | 2543 | 72 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 4 | Sirius |
59.7% | 3380 | 77 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 2 | Pierce |
59.6% | 3406 | 77 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 2 | Gray |
59.9% | 2368 | 71 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
59.7% | 2266 | 71 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 4 | Kaze |
59.7% | 2208 | 70 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 8 | Shade |
59.3% | 2264 | 71 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Ziggy |
59.0% | 2284 | 71 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 1 | Hank |
58.9% | 2022 | 69 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 1 | Juju |
60.2% | 1064 | 59 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 2 | Ruffs |
59.4% | 1207 | 61 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 2 | Jae-Yong |
60.2% | 874 | 57 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Gigi |
58.6% | 1447 | 64 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 10 | Sprout |
57.5% | 2661 | 73 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▲ 1 | Amber |
57.4% | 2492 | 72 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▼ 13 | Ash |
56.4% | 3583 | 78 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▲ 9 | Meeple |
56.4% | 1794 | 67 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▲ 11 | Stu |
55.5% | 2142 | 70 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▲ 4 | Najia |
56.4% | 1231 | 62 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▲ 5 | Lola |
56.4% | 1067 | 59 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | – | Moe |
56.6% | 945 | 58 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | – | Sam |
56.8% | 841 | 56 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | ▲ 10 | Janet |
57.0% | 740 | 54 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 38 | ▼ 6 | Meg |
52.9% | 7449 | 89 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 16 | Sandy |
52.8% | 4707 | 82 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 9 | Griff |
52.3% | 10355 | 93 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 7 | Willow |
54.0% | 1371 | 63 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 9 | Mortis |
52.2% | 5098 | 83 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 3 | Mico |
54.5% | 862 | 56 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 12 | Mandy |
53.5% | 1474 | 64 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 11 | Berry |
51.5% | 8506 | 91 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 5 | Penny |
51.2% | 11066 | 94 | 2.7% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 5 | Lou |
51.4% | 6706 | 87 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 6 | Kit |
52.4% | 1363 | 63 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 16 | Kenji |
50.6% | 8335 | 90 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 5 | Emz |
50.2% | 15487 | 100 | 3.7% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 7 | Nita |
50.5% | 6757 | 87 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 2 | Tick |
49.8% | 24668 | 100 | 5.5% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 4 | Jessie |
49.8% | 9338 | 92 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▲ 3 | Alli |
52.4% | 693 | 53 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▼ 10 | Rosa |
50.1% | 3710 | 78 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▲ 6 | Pam |
49.7% | 3267 | 76 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▼ 5 | 8-Bit |
48.4% | 9593 | 92 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▲ 18 | Gus |
49.9% | 1125 | 60 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▼ 1 | Poco |
47.5% | 8522 | 91 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 60 | ▼ 7 | Bibi |
47.4% | 7088 | 88 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 61 | – | Tara |
47.7% | 3913 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Barley |
47.2% | 8057 | 90 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 1 | Frank |
46.6% | 6639 | 87 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 5 | Nani |
47.8% | 804 | 55 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 5 | Surge |
45.9% | 7769 | 89 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 2 | Larry & Lawrie |
46.0% | 3462 | 77 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 8 | Edgar |
44.4% | 14045 | 98 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 5 | Fang |
44.5% | 4857 | 82 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 4 | Jacky |
43.9% | 3184 | 76 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 11 | Clancy |
43.9% | 2795 | 74 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 3 | Dynamike |
43.1% | 10581 | 94 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 5 | Spike |
43.3% | 5858 | 85 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 7 | Pearl |
43.5% | 2533 | 72 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 3 | Gale |
43.0% | 3284 | 76 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 3 | Buzz |
42.2% | 2496 | 72 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 4 | Bull |
41.8% | 3872 | 79 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 7 | Squeak |
41.5% | 5512 | 84 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 1 | Carl |
41.3% | 3388 | 77 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 2 | Angelo |
41.8% | 419 | 46 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Grom |
41.0% | 3350 | 77 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 8 | Rico |
40.1% | 5579 | 84 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 3 | Brock |
39.7% | 6365 | 86 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 12 | El Primo |
39.4% | 5025 | 83 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | Mr. P |
39.5% | 2006 | 69 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 1 | Maisie |
39.1% | 1835 | 68 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 8 | Colette |
38.3% | 3624 | 78 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 10 | Cordelius |
38.2% | 2138 | 70 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
38.0% | 1577 | 65 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 5 | Buster |
36.9% | 2048 | 69 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 7 | Crow |
36.3% | 5745 | 85 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 5 | Max |
36.2% | 2704 | 73 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 2 | Lily |
36.1% | 1952 | 69 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
36.0% | 2218 | 70 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 12 | Ollie |
35.7% | 1096 | 60 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 8 | Shelly |
35.5% | 4462 | 81 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 8 | Darryl |
35.3% | 3151 | 76 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 4 | Eve |
35.1% | 1276 | 62 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 7 | Melodie |
35.1% | 1618 | 66 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Byron |
34.1% | 2941 | 75 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 4 | Colt |
33.6% | 5111 | 83 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 3 | Leon |
33.6% | 2558 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
32.7% | 2185 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 3 | Charlie |
31.4% | 1543 | 65 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 2 | Bonnie |
30.4% | 1273 | 62 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▲ 1 | Piper |
27.9% | 1967 | 69 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 1 | Gene |
24.3% | 1625 | 66 | 0.4% | Rather not |