
Knockout
78,052 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 54 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,842 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 2,459 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,842 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 2,459 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (19 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Sirius |
62.0% | 5423 | 84 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Sprout |
60.6% | 3687 | 78 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 3 | ▲ 1 | Grom |
59.3% | 4788 | 82 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 1 | Mico |
58.7% | 5623 | 84 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 5 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
58.3% | 3632 | 78 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 3 | Juju |
58.6% | 2609 | 73 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | – | Spike |
57.4% | 5633 | 84 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 8 | ▼ 2 | Ziggy |
58.1% | 2236 | 71 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 9 | ▼ 1 | Pierce |
56.9% | 4441 | 81 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 10 | ▲ 2 | Byron |
55.5% | 7066 | 88 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 11 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
56.1% | 3317 | 76 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 12 | ▲ 5 | Piper |
55.1% | 10139 | 93 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 13 | – | Leon |
55.0% | 9431 | 92 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 14 | ▲ 1 | Mandy |
54.9% | 9108 | 92 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 15 | ▼ 4 | Kit |
54.9% | 8188 | 90 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 16 | ▼ 2 | Nani |
55.0% | 5563 | 84 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
55.5% | 2155 | 70 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 18 | ▲ 5 | Janet |
54.9% | 2705 | 73 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 19 | ▲ 14 | Tick |
53.7% | 6681 | 87 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Najia |
54.0% | 4515 | 81 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 21 | ▼ 3 | Meeple |
53.9% | 4141 | 80 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▲ 16 | Edgar |
53.0% | 17627 | 100 | 7.2% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▲ 4 | Crow |
53.3% | 7919 | 89 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▼ 4 | Gray |
53.6% | 4758 | 82 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▲ 57 | Wendy |
69.8% | 106 | 25 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 26 | – | Belle |
53.2% | 4898 | 82 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 5 | Otis |
53.3% | 3473 | 77 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 7 | Willow |
53.4% | 3201 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 29 | ▼ 5 | Bea |
52.8% | 6079 | 86 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 30 | – | Eve |
53.1% | 2317 | 71 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 31 | ▼ 3 | Charlie |
52.9% | 2476 | 72 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 32 | ▼ 7 | Lily |
52.1% | 5503 | 84 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 33 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
52.2% | 3737 | 78 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 34 | – | Bo |
52.1% | 3847 | 79 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 35 | ▼ 6 | Pearl |
52.4% | 2668 | 73 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | ▲ 3 | Surge |
51.9% | 4603 | 81 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▲ 4 | Dynamike |
51.5% | 7943 | 90 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
52.1% | 2384 | 72 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | ▼ 4 | Finx |
52.0% | 2453 | 72 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▼ 4 | Mina |
51.7% | 2688 | 73 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | ▼ 11 | Mr. P |
51.5% | 3360 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▲ 14 | Brock |
50.6% | 13641 | 98 | 3.7% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▲ 3 | Berry |
51.5% | 2953 | 75 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▼ 4 | Maisie |
51.1% | 3824 | 79 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▲ 16 | Emz |
50.8% | 4736 | 82 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▲ 7 | Griff |
50.6% | 4424 | 81 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▼ 5 | R-T |
51.2% | 2171 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▼ 5 | Gus |
50.2% | 6617 | 87 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▲ 2 | Cordelius |
50.4% | 4532 | 81 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 7 | Rico |
49.9% | 9748 | 93 | 2.8% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 7 | Colette |
50.0% | 6908 | 87 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 2 | Kenji |
50.4% | 3412 | 77 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 7 | Hank |
50.7% | 2627 | 73 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 9 | Chester |
50.1% | 4481 | 81 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 7 | Max |
50.0% | 4950 | 82 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 6 | Fang |
49.9% | 4704 | 82 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 10 | Moe |
50.8% | 1828 | 68 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 9 | Stu |
49.5% | 6107 | 86 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 5 | Angelo |
49.6% | 5061 | 83 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 8 | Lola |
49.9% | 2908 | 74 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 7 | Starr Nova |
49.5% | 3834 | 79 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 3 | Carl |
49.3% | 4610 | 81 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 7 | Nori |
49.3% | 3751 | 78 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 2 | Melodie |
49.4% | 2662 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 6 | Ruffs |
49.4% | 2579 | 73 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 8 | Shade |
48.9% | 3903 | 79 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 1 | Buzz |
48.9% | 3790 | 78 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 5 | Tara |
49.0% | 3190 | 76 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 2 | Mortis |
48.3% | 7452 | 89 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Lumi |
49.2% | 2081 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 2 | Amber |
48.9% | 2589 | 73 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 2 | Colt |
47.8% | 14876 | 99 | 4.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Bibi |
48.2% | 4065 | 80 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 2 | Buster |
48.9% | 1748 | 67 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 4 | Meg |
48.2% | 2691 | 73 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 1 | Penny |
47.6% | 4002 | 79 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 1 | Lou |
47.9% | 2144 | 70 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 1 | Gene |
46.8% | 3951 | 79 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 1 | Ollie |
47.4% | 1531 | 65 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 4 | Draco |
47.0% | 1681 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 2 | Clancy |
46.9% | 1780 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 3 | 8-Bit |
45.8% | 5391 | 84 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Darryl |
45.9% | 4654 | 82 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 1 | Gigi |
46.6% | 1510 | 65 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 4 | Gale |
45.8% | 2753 | 74 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 2 | Frank |
44.8% | 4697 | 82 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Jessie |
44.7% | 3872 | 79 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 2 | Sandy |
44.3% | 2086 | 70 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
44.0% | 3471 | 77 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
43.8% | 1752 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 1 | Alli |
43.5% | 2199 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 3 | Ash |
43.3% | 2005 | 69 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Sam |
43.1% | 2306 | 71 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 2 | Shelly |
40.6% | 9355 | 92 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
40.5% | 2631 | 73 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 2 | Barley |
40.0% | 5250 | 83 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 2 | Doug |
39.8% | 2089 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 1 | Bolt |
39.1% | 2040 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 2 | Poco |
38.0% | 5560 | 84 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
37.9% | 6340 | 86 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 1 | Trunk |
37.6% | 1725 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▲ 1 | Nita |
37.0% | 5673 | 84 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
36.5% | 1790 | 67 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
31.8% | 5460 | 84 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 1 | Jacky |
31.5% | 2470 | 72 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Rosa |
24.8% | 3570 | 78 | 0.6% | Rather not |