
Brawl Ball
202,767 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 74 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 5,264 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 5,264 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (1 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
77.0% | 29023 | 100 | 2.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Bolt |
71.0% | 14938 | 99 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
68.1% | 43436 | 100 | 3.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Starr Nova |
66.3% | 19721 | 100 | 1.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 1 | Ash |
66.9% | 4613 | 81 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 1 | Damian |
66.3% | 6039 | 85 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Pearl |
64.3% | 6136 | 86 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Gigi |
63.2% | 4117 | 80 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Otis |
62.3% | 7821 | 89 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Charlie |
63.1% | 3506 | 77 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Lumi |
62.0% | 8779 | 91 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | – | Jae-Yong |
63.4% | 2325 | 71 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | – | Finx |
62.9% | 2992 | 75 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 2 | Ollie |
62.9% | 1926 | 68 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 3 | Glowy |
61.8% | 3522 | 77 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 1 | Lou |
61.1% | 6100 | 86 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 3 | Draco |
62.3% | 2229 | 71 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 4 | Ruffs |
61.1% | 4829 | 82 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 4 | Pierce |
60.1% | 18631 | 100 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 10 | R-T |
61.4% | 2667 | 73 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 2 | Meeple |
60.2% | 6896 | 87 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 2 | Trunk |
61.1% | 2752 | 74 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▼ 2 | Moe |
60.2% | 5857 | 85 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 2 | Doug |
60.6% | 3737 | 78 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 3 | Najia |
60.5% | 3417 | 77 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 1 | Clancy |
59.6% | 6003 | 85 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 4 | Mina |
58.7% | 16370 | 100 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 3 | Kaze |
59.2% | 6888 | 87 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
59.3% | 4983 | 83 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▼ 1 | Chester |
58.7% | 9813 | 93 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▲ 1 | Sandy |
59.8% | 2950 | 75 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▼ 7 | Ziggy |
60.3% | 1765 | 67 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▲ 11 | Cordelius |
58.2% | 4593 | 81 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
57.1% | 28918 | 100 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | – | Shade |
58.1% | 4640 | 81 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | ▼ 2 | Amber |
58.2% | 3539 | 77 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | ▲ 2 | Gale |
56.9% | 6107 | 86 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Maisie |
56.6% | 5012 | 83 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 3 | Melodie |
56.0% | 10564 | 94 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 10 | Sam |
57.3% | 2425 | 72 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 5 | Bo |
56.0% | 8624 | 91 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
56.3% | 5494 | 84 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 9 | Lola |
57.1% | 2522 | 72 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 3 | Gray |
55.8% | 9324 | 92 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 5 | Griff |
55.1% | 34755 | 100 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 9 | Buster |
57.4% | 1522 | 65 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 2 | Buzz |
55.4% | 7452 | 89 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 8 | Pam |
56.2% | 2561 | 73 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 7 | Juju |
58.2% | 819 | 56 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 7 | Janet |
56.5% | 1773 | 67 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 4 | Alli |
56.5% | 1443 | 64 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▲ 2 | Bea |
54.3% | 11421 | 95 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 53 | – | Willow |
55.6% | 2408 | 72 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▲ 4 | Sprout |
54.9% | 4161 | 80 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▼ 4 | Eve |
56.2% | 1494 | 65 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 8 | Carl |
54.1% | 10736 | 94 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▲ 2 | Hank |
55.4% | 2196 | 70 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▲ 2 | Kit |
54.1% | 4819 | 82 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▲ 2 | Belle |
54.1% | 4088 | 80 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 60 | ▲ 4 | Lily |
54.1% | 3027 | 75 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 61 | ▲ 1 | Bonnie |
54.2% | 2552 | 73 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 62 | ▼ 17 | Meg |
52.2% | 38464 | 100 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 63 | ▼ 6 | Max |
52.1% | 27582 | 100 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 64 | ▼ 1 | Fang |
51.5% | 27748 | 100 | 2.3% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 1 | Berry |
53.0% | 2408 | 72 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 1 | Spike |
51.4% | 11499 | 95 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 3 | Gus |
51.7% | 4658 | 82 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 3 | Byron |
50.8% | 14220 | 98 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
51.5% | 3772 | 78 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 2 | Larry & Lawrie |
51.9% | 1658 | 66 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 3 | Penny |
50.8% | 4421 | 81 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 6 | Mico |
51.9% | 1471 | 64 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Mr. P |
51.7% | 1604 | 66 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 5 | Kenji |
49.7% | 19365 | 100 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 1 | Mandy |
50.0% | 5968 | 85 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 3 | Bull |
49.6% | 11434 | 95 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 2 | Leon |
49.6% | 7745 | 89 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 7 | Chuck |
51.0% | 1178 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 2 | Mortis |
48.5% | 53515 | 100 | 3.9% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 3 | Colette |
48.5% | 11489 | 95 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Nani |
49.0% | 3930 | 79 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 2 | Piper |
47.8% | 20409 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
47.7% | 10638 | 94 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 2 | Gene |
48.7% | 1989 | 69 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 3 | 8-Bit |
47.2% | 18580 | 100 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 1 | Grom |
48.3% | 1743 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 2 | Surge |
46.3% | 29867 | 100 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 1 | Jacky |
46.9% | 3610 | 78 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 1 | Darryl |
46.2% | 8912 | 91 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 2 | Bibi |
45.3% | 27020 | 100 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 2 | Angelo |
45.7% | 1159 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 1 | Jessie |
44.2% | 6972 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Emz |
43.1% | 19283 | 100 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Crow |
42.3% | 22470 | 100 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 3 | Rosa |
42.4% | 3012 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Tick |
41.2% | 8745 | 91 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 2 | Colt |
40.5% | 67963 | 100 | 5.6% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 1 | Rico |
39.4% | 35556 | 100 | 3.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 2 | Frank |
38.6% | 25529 | 100 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 2 | Barley |
39.2% | 3755 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 1 | Dynamike |
37.7% | 15864 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Brock |
35.0% | 44734 | 100 | 4.2% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | El Primo |
34.7% | 17855 | 100 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Edgar |
32.5% | 60674 | 100 | 6.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Nita |
31.2% | 19740 | 100 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Shelly |
26.6% | 32624 | 100 | 3.6% | Rather not |