My roster

Enter your player tag and the site hides everything you cannot play anyway: brawlers you are missing, and those below power 9 — below 11 from Mythic upwards. The tag goes to the official API once and then stays in your browser. It is neither stored nor logged here, and there is no account.

You can find your tag in the game, under your name in your profile.

EN
Knockout

Close Call

39,043 battles collected on this map.

TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 48 of 105 brawlers above 50%.

Trophy Road
Close CallKnockout

Recommendation

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean
Good pick SolidThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Knockout): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.
TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.
Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 3,518 real line-ups.

1
82.5% expected
2
82.4% expected
3
82.4% expected
4
82.4% expected
5
82.4% expected
6
82.4% expected
How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 3,518 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (118 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#BrawlerWin rateGamesTrustPick rateRating
1▲ 1 Larry & Lawrie 62.6%
2122 70
0.2% Good pick
2▼ 1 Sirius 61.7%
3002 75
0.3% Good pick
3 Edgar 60.5%
8798 91
2.7% Good pick
4 Spike 60.5%
2768 74
0.4% Good pick
5 Grom 60.7%
2191 70
0.5% Good pick
6 Tick 59.3%
2896 74
0.5% Good pick
7▲ 1 Sprout 58.8%
1891 68
0.5% Solid
8▼ 1 Emz 58.1%
2473 72
0.6% Solid
9 Ziggy 59.5%
1128 60
0.1% Solid
10 Dynamike 57.0%
4730 82
0.6% Solid
11 Squeak 58.1%
1762 67
0.4% Solid
12 Mico 56.6%
3148 76
0.4% Solid
13▲ 1 Juju 57.3%
1175 61
0.1% Solid
14▼ 1 Rico 55.0%
6556 87
1.2% Solid
15 Crow 54.9%
3984 79
0.4% Solid
16 Willow 55.6%
1930 68
0.3% Solid
17 Berry 55.6%
1742 67
0.3% Solid
18 Jae-Yong 56.4%
1049 59
0.3% Solid
19 Meeple 54.4%
2202 70
0.6% Rather not
20 Kit 52.8%
4682 82
0.5% Rather not
21▲ 3 Leon 52.0%
4745 82
0.3% Rather not
22▲ 1 Mandy 52.1%
3454 77
0.4% Rather not
23▼ 2 Hank 52.8%
1696 66
0.4% Rather not
24▲ 4 Otis 52.7%
1687 66
0.4% Rather not
25▼ 3 Lily 51.8%
3426 77
0.3% Rather not
26▼ 1 Pierce 52.6%
1564 65
0.3% Rather not
27▲ 2 Griff 52.0%
2400 72
0.3% Rather not
28▲ 2 Frank 51.7%
2389 72
0.4% Rather not
29▼ 3 Bibi 51.6%
2534 72
0.3% Rather not
30▼ 3 Janet 52.2%
1415 64
0.5% Rather not
31▲ 8 Bo 51.5%
1951 69
0.6% Rather not
32▲ 4 Piper 50.9%
2861 74
0.6% Rather not
33▲ 7 Kenji 51.2%
2112 70
0.4% Rather not
34 Shade 50.9%
2459 72
0.5% Rather not
35▲ 9 Najia 51.2%
1732 67
0.2% Rather not
36▼ 3 Ruffs 51.4%
1441 64
0.4% Rather not
37▼ 5 Gray 50.9%
2088 70
0.1% Rather not
38▼ 3 R-T 51.7%
1086 60
0.2% Rather not
39▼ 2 Brock 50.0%
4917 82
0.9% Rather not
40▲ 5 Bonnie 50.7%
1751 67
0.2% Rather not
41▼ 3 Pearl 50.8%
1497 65
0.4% Rather not
42▼ 1 Bea 50.1%
2658 73
0.6% Rather not
43▲ 3 Cordelius 50.1%
2659 73
0.2% Rather not
44▼ 13 Moe 51.2%
967 58
0.1% Rather not
45▼ 3 Maisie 50.2%
1883 68
0.5% Rather not
46▼ 3 Charlie 50.4%
1196 61
0.2% Rather not
47 Starr Nova 49.8%
2040 69
0.3% Rather not
48▲ 2 Buster 50.5%
1011 59
0.2% Rather not
49▲ 4 Byron 49.4%
2461 72
0.4% Rather not
50▼ 1 Finx 50.1%
1234 62
0.3% Rather not
51▼ 3 Lumi 50.1%
1178 61
0.3% Rather not
52▼ 2 Glowy 49.7%
1173 61
0.2% Rather not
53▲ 2 Surge 48.8%
2725 74
0.2% Rather not
54▼ 2 Colette 48.6%
3221 76
0.6% Rather not
55▼ 2 Wendy 68.3%
41 11
2.2% Rather not
56 Mr. P 48.9%
1738 67
0.3% Rather not
57 Penny 48.7%
2073 69
0.2% Rather not
58▲ 5 Lola 48.9%
1571 65
0.3% Rather not
59▲ 8 Belle 48.7%
1906 68
0.3% Rather not
60 Fang 48.5%
2183 70
0.9% Rather not
61▲ 3 Buzz 48.4%
2032 69
0.3% Rather not
62▼ 3 Nori 48.2%
2072 69
0.4% Rather not
63 Colt 47.2%
6174 86
1.2% Rather not
64▲ 1 8-Bit 47.7%
2496 72
0.9% Rather not
65▲ 6 Gigi 48.8%
850 56
0.1% Rather not
66▼ 8 Nani 47.8%
2134 70
0.3% Rather not
67▲ 3 Chester 47.6%
2548 73
0.2% Rather not
68▼ 7 Ollie 48.6%
835 56
0.2% Rather not
69▼ 1 Jessie 47.5%
2103 70
0.6% Rather not
70▲ 2 Carl 47.3%
2262 71
0.6% Rather not
71▼ 4 Gus 46.9%
3052 75
0.5% Rather not
72▲ 8 Eve 47.7%
889 57
0.2% Rather not
73 Mina 47.2%
1327 63
0.1% Rather not
74▲ 2 Barley 46.5%
3169 76
0.5% Rather not
75▼ 7 Amber 47.1%
1385 63
0.4% Rather not
76▲ 2 Stu 46.4%
3004 75
0.4% Rather not
77▼ 3 Darryl 46.0%
2212 70
0.6% Rather not
78 Angelo 46.1%
1754 67
0.3% Rather not
79 Tara 46.2%
1624 66
0.4% Rather not
80▼ 5 Mortis 45.5%
3622 78
0.7% Rather not
81▲ 4 Max 45.8%
2112 70
0.4% Rather not
82▲ 1 Ash 46.3%
1136 60
0.2% Rather not
83▼ 2 Clancy 46.3%
902 57
0.1% Rather not
84 Meg 45.6%
1526 65
0.1% Rather not
85▲ 3 Doug 45.5%
1427 64
0.1% Rather not
86 Shelly 44.6%
4934 82
1.1% Rather not
87▼ 1 Damian 45.0%
1042 59
0.2% Rather not
88▼ 5 Sam 44.8%
1309 63
0.3% Rather not
89 Draco 44.4%
914 57
0.1% Rather not
90▲ 1 Gale 43.6%
1458 64
0.5% Rather not
91▲ 4 Melodie 43.4%
1226 62
0.1% Rather not
92 Kaze 43.1%
1909 68
0.2% Rather not
93 Bull 42.5%
3604 78
0.8% Rather not
94▲ 4 Alli 42.7%
1105 60
0.2% Rather not
95▼ 5 Sandy 42.7%
1151 61
0.4% Rather not
96▲ 1 Lou 42.5%
993 58
0.1% Rather not
97▼ 3 Trunk 42.4%
1002 59
54.1% Rather not
98▼ 2 Gene 42.1%
1694 66
0.4% Rather not
99 Nita 40.0%
3189 76
1.2% Rather not
100 Poco 39.8%
3146 76
1.1% Rather not
101 Jacky 39.3%
1541 65
0.6% Rather not
102 Pam 38.3%
1505 65
0.6% Rather not
103▲ 1 El Primo 35.8%
3059 75
0.8% Rather not
104▼ 1 Chuck 35.0%
843 56
0.1% Rather not
105 Bolt 32.1%
725 54
0.1% Rather not
106 Rosa 28.0%
1910 68
0.4% Rather not