My roster

Enter your player tag and the site hides everything you cannot play anyway: brawlers you are missing, and those below power 9 — below 11 from Mythic upwards. The tag goes to the official API once and then stays in your browser. It is neither stored nor logged here, and there is no account.

You can find your tag in the game, under your name in your profile.

EN
Knockout

Flaring Phoenix

1,590 battles collected on this map.

Trophy Road
Flaring PhoenixKnockout

Recommendation

What the rating, star, trust and the tags mean
Strong pick Solid Rather notThe rank on this map among all map/brawler rows of the mode (Knockout): Strong pick top tenth, Good pick top quarter, Solid upper half, Rather not the rest. The thresholds come from the field — the exact values are in the badge's tooltip. Not the tier list: that counts how many maps of the rotation a brawler is usable on. Rather not among the recommended eight therefore does not mean “bad”, but: this map has nothing better to offer.
TrustHow dependable the win rate next to it is, 0–100. Depends purely on the number of games — not on how good the brawler is.
Carry — becomes star player unusually often on this map: he deals the damage and takes the objective. The game runs through him.
Enabler — rarely becomes star player: he clears the way, heals, controls, and others do the scoring. This is no verdict on his strength — how good he is here is the win rate on the card. Measured across 1,620 map/brawler rows, enablers win on average 3.8 points less often than carries, but the star rate explains only 11% of the differences: there are plenty of strong enablers and weak carries. The star says how a brawler wins, not whether.

Hidden gems & traps

From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.

If you queue as three

The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.

Searched freely across 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 3,297 real line-ups.

1
82.7% expected
2
82.7% expected
3
82.7% expected
4
82.6% expected
5
82.5% expected
6
82.5% expected
How these numbers are arrived at

What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.

Best · on this map. All 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 3,297 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.

What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (115 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.

All brawlers on this map

Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.

#BrawlerWin rateGamesTrustPick rateRating
1 Kit 84.1%
491 48
0.1% Strong pick
2 Mortis 90.4%
114 26
0.1% Strong pick
3 Crow 69.3%
192 34
0.1% Solid
4 Frank 59.7%
771 55
22.2% Solid
5 Brock 58.3%
1173 61
0.4% Solid
6 Bolt 69.8%
162 31
4.7% Solid
7 Tick 54.6%
2003 69
0.5% Solid
8 Pierce 72.6%
84 21
2.4% Rather not
9 Sirius 53.8%
1191 61
0.2% Rather not
10 Bull 82.9%
41 11
0.1% Rather not
11 Squeak 58.4%
197 34
0.1% Rather not
12 Bibi 54.5%
385 44
0.1% Rather not
13 Edgar 50.4%
3166 76
0.4% Rather not
14 Mandy 50.7%
897 57
0.2% Rather not
15 Fang 73.7%
38 10
0.0% Rather not
16 Lola 75.8%
33 7
1.0% Rather not
17 Hank 58.7%
75 20
2.2% Rather not
18 Belle 109.1%
11 0
0.1% Rather not
19 Nani 51.6%
219 36
6.3% Rather not
20 Kenji 51.7%
151 30
0.1% Rather not
21▲ 8 Byron 70.0%
20 0
0.0% Rather not
22 Melodie 56.9%
51 14
1.5% Rather not
23▼ 1 Ziggy 57.4%
47 13
0.0% Rather not
24▼ 1 Janet 58.5%
41 11
0.0% Rather not
25 Surge 61.3%
31 7
0.0% Rather not
26▲ 3 Rosa 55.4%
56 15
1.6% Rather not
27▼ 4 Chuck 59.4%
32 7
0.9% Rather not
28 Piper 47.5%
577 50
0.1% Rather not
29▼ 4 Nori 47.2%
614 51
0.2% Rather not
30▼ 1 Penny 80.0%
10 0
0.3% Rather not
31▲ 11 Sprout 56.7%
30 6
0.0% Rather not
32▼ 1 Bonnie 57.7%
26 4
0.0% Rather not
33▼ 1 Grom 58.3%
24 3
0.0% Rather not
34▼ 1 Barley 53.5%
43 11
1.2% Rather not
35▼ 1 Colt 48.7%
156 31
4.5% Rather not
36 Glowy 49.5%
91 23
0.0% Rather not
37 Nita 49.0%
102 24
2.9% Rather not
38 Lily 48.1%
129 28
0.0% Rather not
39 Dynamike 46.3%
447 46
0.1% Rather not
40▲ 4 8-Bit 54.5%
22 1
0.0% Rather not
41▼ 5 Ash 50.0%
52 14
0.0% Rather not
42▼ 2 Trunk 50.0%
44 12
1.3% Rather not
43NEW Buster 60.0%
10 0
0.1% Rather not
44▼ 3 Cordelius 60.0%
10 0
0.0% Rather not
45▼ 2 Willow 46.9%
32 7
0.9% Rather not
46▼ 2 Emz 44.7%
704 53
0.1% Rather not
47▼ 1 Darryl 46.7%
15 0
0.4% Rather not
48▼ 1 Jacky 46.2%
39 10
1.1% Rather not
49 Eve 45.5%
22 1
0.1% Rather not
50▲ 4 Doug 44.4%
18 0
0.0% Rather not
51▼ 1 Poco 44.9%
49 13
1.4% Rather not
52NEW Gray 42.9%
14 0
0.0% Rather not
53▼ 2 Starr Nova 41.7%
12 0
0.2% Rather not
54▼ 2 Stu 41.7%
12 0
0.3% Rather not
55▼ 1 Jessie 44.8%
172 32
5.0% Rather not
56▼ 8 Griff 43.6%
39 10
0.3% Rather not
57NEW Max 40.0%
15 0
0.4% Rather not
58▼ 3 Moe 38.5%
13 0
0.4% Rather not
59NEW Ruffs 38.5%
13 0
0.0% Rather not
60▼ 4 Sam 42.4%
33 7
1.0% Rather not
61NEW Meeple 33.3%
12 0
0.0% Rather not
62▼ 4 Chester 40.6%
32 7
0.9% Rather not
63▼ 4 Buzz 41.5%
41 11
1.2% Rather not
64▼ 4 Maisie 42.4%
59 16
1.7% Rather not
65▼ 4 Mico 30.0%
10 0
0.1% Rather not
66▼ 4 Gale 41.9%
62 17
0.0% Rather not
67NEW Pearl 37.5%
24 3
0.7% Rather not
68▼ 9 Gene 36.0%
25 3
0.1% Rather not
69▼ 5 Pam 39.5%
43 11
1.2% Rather not
70▼ 6 Bo 28.6%
14 0
0.0% Rather not
71▼ 6 Sandy 39.4%
66 18
1.9% Rather not
72▼ 6 El Primo 40.6%
106 25
3.1% Rather not
73▼ 3 Jae-Yong 26.3%
19 0
0.0% Rather not
74▼ 7 Lou 35.4%
48 13
1.4% Rather not
75▼ 7 Finx 36.7%
60 16
1.7% Rather not
76▼ 5 Leon 0.0%
11 0
0.1% Rather not
77▼ 8 Gigi 25.0%
28 5
0.8% Rather not
78▼ 6 Alli 26.5%
34 8
0.0% Rather not
79▼ 6 Shade 35.4%
79 21
0.1% Rather not
80▼ 6 Colette 15.0%
20 0
0.0% Rather not
81▼ 6 Bea 36.5%
115 26
3.3% Rather not
82▼ 6 Angelo 20.7%
29 6
0.0% Rather not
83▼ 6 Draco 23.5%
34 8
0.0% Rather not
84▼ 6 Clancy 27.3%
44 12
1.3% Rather not
85▼ 6 Lumi 0.0%
30 6
0.9% Rather not
86▼ 6 Amber 31.5%
178 33
0.0% Rather not
87▼ 6 Spike 33.7%
294 40
8.5% Rather not
88▼ 6 Shelly 30.9%
223 36
0.0% Rather not
89▼ 6 Kaze 7.3%
55 15
1.6% Rather not
90▼ 6 Rico 14.6%
212 35
0.2% Rather not