
Knockout
1,800 battles collected on this map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 2,945 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 9,880 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 2,945 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (90 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Kit |
82.6% | 534 | 49 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Mortis |
85.1% | 141 | 29 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Crow |
69.3% | 225 | 36 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 4 | – | Brock |
58.4% | 1279 | 62 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 5 | – | Frank |
59.6% | 809 | 55 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 6 | – | Bolt |
69.3% | 163 | 31 | 8.8% | Solid | ||
| 7 | – | Tick |
54.3% | 2151 | 70 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 8 | – | Sirius |
54.4% | 1273 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 9 | – | Pierce |
64.7% | 119 | 27 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 10 | – | Bull |
83.3% | 42 | 11 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 11 | – | Bibi |
54.1% | 414 | 45 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 12 | – | Edgar |
50.5% | 3306 | 76 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 13 | – | Squeak |
56.3% | 231 | 37 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 14 | – | Mandy |
50.5% | 971 | 58 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 15 | – | Fang |
70.7% | 41 | 11 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 16 | – | Lola |
71.4% | 35 | 8 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 17 | – | Hank |
58.3% | 84 | 21 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 18 | ▲ 1 | Byron |
64.0% | 50 | 14 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 19 | ▲ 1 | Rosa |
59.4% | 64 | 17 | 3.5% | Rather not | ||
| 20 | ▼ 2 | Belle |
100.0% | 12 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 21 | – | Kenji |
51.6% | 161 | 31 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 22 | ▲ 7 | Sprout |
63.6% | 33 | 7 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 23 | – | Nani |
50.2% | 235 | 37 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 24 | ▼ 1 | Ziggy |
57.4% | 47 | 13 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 25 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
55.8% | 52 | 14 | 2.8% | Rather not | ||
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
58.8% | 34 | 8 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 27 | ▼ 2 | Barley |
55.6% | 45 | 12 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 28 | ▲ 1 | Piper |
47.2% | 638 | 52 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 29 | ▼ 2 | Nori |
47.0% | 642 | 52 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 30 | ▼ 1 | Janet |
54.5% | 44 | 12 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 31 | ▲ 4 | Surge |
51.6% | 64 | 17 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Dynamike |
46.9% | 467 | 47 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 33 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
48.1% | 185 | 33 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 34 | – | Nita |
49.1% | 108 | 25 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 35 | ▲ 1 | Bonnie |
55.6% | 27 | 4 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | ▲ 1 | Penny |
57.1% | 21 | 1 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▲ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
60.0% | 15 | 0 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▲ 1 | Glowy |
48.9% | 92 | 23 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | ▲ 1 | Mico |
61.5% | 13 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▲ 6 | 8-Bit |
53.8% | 26 | 4 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | ▼ 8 | Ash |
50.0% | 52 | 14 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▼ 1 | Leon |
51.6% | 31 | 7 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▼ 1 | Trunk |
50.0% | 44 | 12 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | NEW | Buster |
60.0% | 10 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▼ 2 | Lily |
46.9% | 147 | 30 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▼ 2 | Darryl |
50.0% | 18 | 0 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▼ 2 | Cordelius |
50.0% | 16 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | NEW | Meg |
50.0% | 10 | 0 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▼ 2 | Sam |
45.7% | 35 | 8 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▼ 2 | Emz |
44.4% | 734 | 54 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▲ 6 | Doug |
44.4% | 18 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 2 | Moe |
44.4% | 18 | 0 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▼ 4 | Gray |
43.8% | 16 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 3 | Stu |
41.7% | 12 | 0 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 3 | Grom |
44.4% | 45 | 12 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 3 | Jacky |
43.9% | 41 | 11 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 3 | Poco |
44.0% | 50 | 14 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 3 | Jessie |
44.5% | 182 | 33 | 9.8% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 3 | Willow |
43.2% | 37 | 9 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | NEW | Ruffs |
40.0% | 15 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 3 | Chester |
42.9% | 35 | 8 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 3 | Maisie |
43.3% | 67 | 18 | 3.6% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 2 | Eve |
40.0% | 25 | 3 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | NEW | Meeple |
33.3% | 12 | 0 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 3 | Max |
38.1% | 21 | 1 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 2 | Buzz |
40.9% | 44 | 12 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 7 | Griff |
39.5% | 38 | 10 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | NEW | Pearl |
37.0% | 27 | 4 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 7 | Gene |
36.0% | 25 | 3 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 4 | Pam |
39.5% | 43 | 11 | 2.3% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 5 | Starr Nova |
28.6% | 14 | 0 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 5 | Najia |
20.0% | 10 | 0 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 5 | El Primo |
41.7% | 115 | 26 | 6.2% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 5 | Gale |
40.0% | 65 | 18 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 6 | Damian |
21.4% | 14 | 0 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 4 | Sandy |
39.1% | 69 | 19 | 3.7% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 5 | Bo |
29.6% | 27 | 4 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Jae-Yong |
23.8% | 21 | 1 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 6 | Finx |
36.5% | 63 | 17 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 5 | Lou |
34.0% | 50 | 14 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 5 | Bea |
39.1% | 128 | 28 | 6.9% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 5 | Colette |
28.1% | 32 | 7 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 9 | Gigi |
25.0% | 28 | 5 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 5 | Draco |
29.3% | 41 | 11 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 5 | Clancy |
30.4% | 46 | 12 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 5 | Alli |
26.3% | 38 | 10 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 5 | Shade |
34.9% | 86 | 22 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 5 | Angelo |
22.9% | 35 | 8 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 5 | Lumi |
3.2% | 31 | 7 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 5 | Amber |
31.7% | 189 | 34 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 5 | Shelly |
32.6% | 236 | 37 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 5 | Spike |
31.8% | 321 | 42 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 5 | Kaze |
7.1% | 56 | 15 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 5 | Rico |
18.1% | 232 | 37 | 0.3% | Rather not |