
Hot Zone
192,606 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 56 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,260 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 804 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,260 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 804 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (3 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
73.5% | 19452 | 100 | 1.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Hank |
70.9% | 11571 | 95 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Bolt |
68.7% | 8136 | 90 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Nori |
67.1% | 21431 | 100 | 1.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Starr Nova |
65.0% | 11532 | 95 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 1 | Draco |
64.9% | 3184 | 76 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▼ 1 | Bo |
63.0% | 30697 | 100 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
64.3% | 4001 | 79 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 1 | Chuck |
62.9% | 12313 | 96 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 1 | Doug |
63.5% | 5013 | 83 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 3 | Trunk |
64.3% | 2598 | 73 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | – | Sirius |
62.6% | 11516 | 95 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | – | Mina |
62.3% | 6114 | 86 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 2 | Jae-Yong |
63.7% | 1706 | 67 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 1 | Sprout |
62.4% | 3119 | 76 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | Finx |
62.1% | 3656 | 78 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 3 | Pierce |
60.5% | 13864 | 98 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
61.6% | 3587 | 78 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 2 | Moe |
61.9% | 2503 | 72 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Kaze |
61.5% | 3335 | 77 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 1 | Amber |
60.7% | 6564 | 87 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 4 | R-T |
62.3% | 1626 | 66 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 23 | – | Gray |
59.7% | 8975 | 91 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 24 | – | Lumi |
60.1% | 5008 | 83 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 25 | – | Juju |
61.3% | 1952 | 69 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 26 | – | Chester |
59.7% | 4894 | 82 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 27 | – | Ziggy |
59.8% | 4293 | 80 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 28 | – | Stu |
59.3% | 5294 | 83 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 29 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
60.1% | 2512 | 72 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 30 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
59.3% | 4366 | 81 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▲ 1 | Gigi |
60.0% | 2218 | 70 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Shade |
59.1% | 3603 | 78 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | – | Sam |
59.1% | 2428 | 72 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▲ 2 | Gus |
58.2% | 3625 | 78 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | ▼ 1 | Tick |
56.5% | 91872 | 100 | 8.4% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | ▼ 1 | Ruffs |
58.4% | 2229 | 71 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | – | Kenji |
55.7% | 32802 | 100 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 38 | ▲ 3 | Janet |
57.0% | 2331 | 71 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 39 | ▲ 1 | Meeple |
56.7% | 2743 | 74 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 40 | ▼ 2 | Alli |
57.8% | 1304 | 62 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 41 | ▼ 2 | Angelo |
57.3% | 1677 | 66 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 42 | – | Griff |
54.8% | 30188 | 100 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 43 | – | Najia |
56.6% | 2242 | 71 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 44 | – | Emz |
53.9% | 44498 | 100 | 3.9% | Good pick | ||
| 45 | – | Mico |
56.0% | 1891 | 68 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 46 | ▲ 1 | Bibi |
53.2% | 26542 | 100 | 2.4% | Good pick | ||
| 47 | ▲ 1 | Jessie |
53.2% | 25343 | 100 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 2 | Kit |
53.6% | 8376 | 90 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Mortis |
53.1% | 21395 | 100 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Meg |
52.3% | 20795 | 100 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 51 | – | Berry |
52.2% | 21310 | 100 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 52 | – | Penny |
51.6% | 28543 | 100 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 53 | – | Mandy |
51.5% | 8452 | 90 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 54 | – | Lou |
50.9% | 14084 | 98 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Nita |
50.6% | 16812 | 100 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 56 | – | Squeak |
49.9% | 27699 | 100 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▲ 1 | Willow |
50.9% | 1796 | 67 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
49.5% | 8121 | 90 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 59 | – | Pam |
47.4% | 6381 | 86 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Poco |
46.6% | 19788 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Ash |
46.0% | 8020 | 90 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Eve |
46.0% | 5799 | 85 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Fang |
45.0% | 11533 | 95 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Spike |
44.4% | 17169 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Barley |
44.2% | 15507 | 100 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 2 | Melodie |
44.3% | 7337 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 1 | Colette |
44.1% | 10933 | 94 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | Gale |
43.9% | 8813 | 91 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Edgar |
42.8% | 34008 | 100 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Crow |
42.8% | 16874 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Dynamike |
42.5% | 23927 | 100 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Frank |
42.6% | 18383 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
42.3% | 15366 | 99 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
42.5% | 6263 | 86 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Carl |
41.3% | 9816 | 93 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Bull |
40.2% | 11170 | 95 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Piper |
40.1% | 8451 | 90 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Sandy |
39.5% | 8883 | 91 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Max |
39.5% | 8641 | 91 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 2 | Brock |
39.2% | 17766 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 1 | 8-Bit |
39.1% | 19049 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 1 | Pearl |
39.3% | 5978 | 85 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Rosa |
38.9% | 7592 | 89 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Surge |
38.1% | 14122 | 98 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Rico |
37.4% | 12723 | 97 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 2 | Shelly |
36.5% | 11066 | 94 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
36.7% | 4167 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 1 | Clancy |
36.4% | 6770 | 87 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Leon |
36.0% | 6451 | 86 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Colt |
34.8% | 13938 | 98 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 1 | Grom |
34.7% | 6537 | 87 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 1 | Buzz |
34.4% | 4426 | 81 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 2 | Byron |
34.2% | 10005 | 93 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Maisie |
34.1% | 4784 | 82 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Mr. P |
32.1% | 4450 | 81 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Jacky |
32.0% | 6365 | 86 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Buster |
31.7% | 5326 | 84 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Ollie |
29.3% | 2509 | 72 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Lily |
29.1% | 4784 | 82 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Cordelius |
28.5% | 4363 | 81 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 2 | Bea |
28.5% | 6018 | 85 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
28.4% | 4015 | 79 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
28.3% | 3732 | 78 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Charlie |
27.4% | 3898 | 79 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Darryl |
27.0% | 7801 | 89 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
23.5% | 4208 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not |