
Hot Zone
180,389 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 56 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,726 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 763 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,726 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 763 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (9 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
73.6% | 18352 | 100 | 1.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Hank |
70.7% | 10625 | 94 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Bolt |
68.7% | 7663 | 89 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Nori |
67.2% | 20255 | 100 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Starr Nova |
65.1% | 10891 | 94 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Bo |
62.9% | 28710 | 100 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 1 | Draco |
64.5% | 3013 | 75 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
64.1% | 3787 | 78 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 1 | Chuck |
62.9% | 11487 | 95 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 3 | Trunk |
64.6% | 2414 | 72 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Doug |
63.6% | 4652 | 82 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | – | Sirius |
62.5% | 10726 | 94 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | – | Mina |
62.4% | 5822 | 85 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 2 | Jae-Yong |
63.8% | 1625 | 66 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | – | Sprout |
62.6% | 2939 | 75 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 2 | Finx |
62.3% | 3468 | 77 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 1 | Pierce |
60.3% | 12977 | 97 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 3 | Moe |
62.0% | 2364 | 71 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 19 | – | Kaze |
61.4% | 3163 | 76 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 3 | Glowy |
61.3% | 3346 | 77 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 1 | Amber |
60.5% | 6145 | 86 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 2 | R-T |
62.2% | 1503 | 65 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 23 | – | Lumi |
60.2% | 4700 | 82 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 24 | – | Gray |
59.6% | 8432 | 90 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 1 | Juju |
61.2% | 1849 | 68 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Chester |
59.7% | 4615 | 81 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 27 | ▲ 1 | Stu |
59.3% | 4997 | 83 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 28 | ▼ 1 | Ziggy |
59.4% | 3980 | 79 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 29 | – | Nani |
59.2% | 4086 | 80 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
59.9% | 2355 | 71 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▲ 1 | Gigi |
59.8% | 2102 | 70 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▼ 2 | Shade |
59.0% | 3393 | 77 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | – | Sam |
58.9% | 2266 | 71 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | – | Ruffs |
58.9% | 2078 | 69 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | – | Tick |
56.4% | 85865 | 100 | 8.4% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | – | Gus |
57.9% | 3377 | 77 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | – | Kenji |
55.7% | 30666 | 100 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 38 | – | Meeple |
57.0% | 2614 | 73 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 39 | ▲ 2 | Griff |
54.9% | 28175 | 100 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 40 | ▲ 2 | Janet |
56.7% | 2148 | 70 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 41 | ▼ 1 | Angelo |
57.2% | 1577 | 65 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 42 | ▲ 1 | Najia |
56.7% | 2085 | 70 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 43 | ▼ 4 | Alli |
57.6% | 1217 | 61 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 44 | – | Emz |
53.9% | 41786 | 100 | 3.9% | Good pick | ||
| 45 | – | Mico |
56.0% | 1778 | 67 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 46 | – | Jessie |
53.3% | 23667 | 100 | 2.2% | Good pick | ||
| 47 | ▲ 1 | Bibi |
53.1% | 24636 | 100 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 1 | Kit |
53.5% | 7843 | 89 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Mortis |
53.0% | 20101 | 100 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Meg |
52.6% | 19843 | 100 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 51 | – | Berry |
51.9% | 19899 | 100 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 52 | – | Penny |
51.7% | 26682 | 100 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 53 | – | Mandy |
51.7% | 7935 | 90 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 54 | – | Lou |
50.9% | 13258 | 97 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Nita |
50.5% | 15663 | 100 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 56 | – | Squeak |
49.8% | 25725 | 100 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▲ 1 | Willow |
50.8% | 1687 | 66 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
49.5% | 7603 | 89 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 59 | – | Pam |
47.4% | 5967 | 85 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Poco |
46.5% | 18544 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 1 | Ash |
46.0% | 7468 | 89 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 1 | Eve |
46.0% | 5387 | 84 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Fang |
45.0% | 10861 | 94 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Spike |
44.3% | 16118 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 1 | Barley |
44.2% | 14490 | 99 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 1 | Colette |
44.2% | 10281 | 93 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 1 | Melodie |
44.1% | 6840 | 87 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | Gale |
43.8% | 8221 | 90 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Edgar |
42.8% | 31954 | 100 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 1 | Crow |
42.8% | 15833 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 1 | Frank |
42.5% | 17199 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Dynamike |
42.5% | 22241 | 100 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
42.4% | 5814 | 85 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | El Primo |
42.1% | 14270 | 98 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Carl |
41.4% | 9185 | 92 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Bull |
40.5% | 10501 | 94 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Piper |
40.0% | 7932 | 90 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 2 | Max |
39.7% | 8081 | 90 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | 8-Bit |
39.5% | 17962 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 2 | Sandy |
39.7% | 8351 | 90 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 1 | Brock |
39.2% | 16680 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 1 | Pearl |
39.4% | 5610 | 84 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Rosa |
38.9% | 7095 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Surge |
38.3% | 13248 | 97 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Rico |
37.6% | 11884 | 96 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 2 | Shelly |
36.7% | 10335 | 93 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Clancy |
36.6% | 6389 | 86 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
36.5% | 3891 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Leon |
36.0% | 6050 | 85 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Colt |
34.8% | 13107 | 97 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 1 | Grom |
34.4% | 6065 | 85 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 1 | Buzz |
34.4% | 4115 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 2 | Byron |
34.2% | 9359 | 92 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Maisie |
34.1% | 4513 | 81 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Mr. P |
32.3% | 4169 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Jacky |
32.1% | 5977 | 85 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Buster |
31.7% | 4984 | 83 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Ollie |
29.7% | 2360 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Lily |
29.1% | 4499 | 81 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Cordelius |
28.9% | 4099 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Otis |
28.5% | 3766 | 78 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Bonnie |
28.5% | 3495 | 77 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Bea |
28.3% | 5643 | 84 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Charlie |
27.3% | 3651 | 78 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Darryl |
27.2% | 7297 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
23.4% | 3943 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not |