
Hot Zone
150,486 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 56 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,413 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 669 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,413 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 669 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (7 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
73.5% | 15474 | 99 | 1.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Hank |
70.9% | 8615 | 91 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Bolt |
68.9% | 6560 | 87 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Nori |
67.0% | 17249 | 100 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Starr Nova |
65.0% | 9141 | 92 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 1 | Bo |
63.1% | 23912 | 100 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▼ 1 | Damian |
64.0% | 3201 | 76 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Draco |
64.2% | 2608 | 73 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Chuck |
62.7% | 9518 | 92 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 2 | Doug |
63.5% | 3877 | 79 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 2 | Trunk |
64.4% | 2015 | 69 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
62.3% | 8832 | 91 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 2 | Mina |
62.5% | 4930 | 82 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 4 | Finx |
62.8% | 2982 | 75 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 3 | Jae-Yong |
64.0% | 1335 | 63 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 3 | Sprout |
62.0% | 2494 | 72 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 3 | Glowy |
61.8% | 2874 | 74 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 8 | R-T |
63.2% | 1266 | 62 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 3 | Pierce |
60.1% | 10848 | 94 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 2 | Moe |
61.6% | 1982 | 69 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 4 | Lumi |
60.5% | 3904 | 79 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 1 | Kaze |
60.9% | 2645 | 73 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 23 | ▼ 3 | Gray |
59.5% | 7030 | 88 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 1 | Amber |
59.8% | 5120 | 83 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 2 | Chester |
59.4% | 3876 | 79 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 10 | Lola |
60.2% | 1959 | 69 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 27 | ▲ 2 | Ziggy |
59.1% | 3305 | 76 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | – | Nani |
59.0% | 3340 | 77 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▼ 5 | Stu |
58.8% | 4225 | 80 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▲ 7 | Juju |
60.2% | 1526 | 65 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▼ 6 | Shade |
59.1% | 2852 | 74 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▼ 2 | Gigi |
59.2% | 1732 | 67 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▼ 2 | Ruffs |
58.8% | 1781 | 67 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▼ 2 | Tick |
56.2% | 70809 | 100 | 8.4% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | ▼ 1 | Sam |
58.2% | 1880 | 68 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | ▲ 2 | Gus |
57.5% | 2818 | 74 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | ▼ 2 | Kenji |
55.8% | 25458 | 100 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 38 | ▲ 1 | Griff |
54.9% | 23532 | 100 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 39 | ▼ 6 | Meeple |
56.4% | 2235 | 71 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 40 | ▲ 4 | Janet |
56.6% | 1752 | 67 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 41 | ▲ 5 | Alli |
57.6% | 1018 | 59 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 42 | ▲ 3 | Angelo |
56.9% | 1316 | 63 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 43 | ▼ 3 | Najia |
56.3% | 1683 | 66 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 44 | ▼ 3 | Emz |
53.9% | 35030 | 100 | 3.9% | Good pick | ||
| 45 | ▲ 2 | Mico |
55.8% | 1474 | 64 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 46 | ▲ 2 | Kit |
53.7% | 6481 | 86 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 4 | Jessie |
53.1% | 19711 | 100 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 2 | Bibi |
52.9% | 20135 | 100 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 7 | Meg |
52.8% | 17555 | 100 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 1 | Mortis |
52.6% | 16671 | 100 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▲ 1 | Berry |
51.9% | 16278 | 100 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▲ 1 | Penny |
51.7% | 22289 | 100 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▲ 1 | Mandy |
51.9% | 6510 | 87 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▼ 3 | Lou |
51.1% | 11167 | 95 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Nita |
50.6% | 13034 | 97 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 56 | – | Squeak |
49.6% | 21254 | 100 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▲ 3 | Willow |
50.5% | 1418 | 64 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
48.8% | 6313 | 86 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▼ 1 | Pam |
47.8% | 5120 | 83 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 60 | ▼ 1 | Poco |
46.7% | 15666 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Ash |
46.1% | 6277 | 86 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Eve |
45.9% | 4358 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 1 | Fang |
45.3% | 9176 | 92 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 1 | Spike |
44.4% | 13450 | 97 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 1 | Colette |
44.3% | 8650 | 91 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Barley |
44.1% | 12039 | 96 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Gale |
44.1% | 6909 | 87 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 1 | Melodie |
43.8% | 5668 | 84 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
42.8% | 26807 | 100 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 2 | Frank |
42.8% | 14469 | 98 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Crow |
42.7% | 13308 | 97 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 3 | Dynamike |
42.4% | 18504 | 100 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
42.3% | 11555 | 95 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 3 | Larry & Lawrie |
42.4% | 4831 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 2 | Carl |
41.4% | 7657 | 89 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 4 | 8-Bit |
40.1% | 15278 | 99 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 1 | Sandy |
40.1% | 7036 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 3 | Bull |
40.0% | 8701 | 91 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Pearl |
40.2% | 4709 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 3 | Piper |
40.0% | 6589 | 87 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 4 | Brock |
39.2% | 13866 | 98 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 3 | Max |
39.4% | 6685 | 87 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 1 | Rosa |
39.1% | 5817 | 85 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 4 | Surge |
38.7% | 11223 | 95 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 1 | Rico |
37.9% | 9898 | 93 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 4 | Clancy |
37.7% | 5428 | 84 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Belle |
37.1% | 3216 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Shelly |
36.6% | 8619 | 91 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 1 | Leon |
35.8% | 4971 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | Colt |
34.7% | 10978 | 94 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 2 | Byron |
34.3% | 7744 | 89 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 2 | Buzz |
34.1% | 3417 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Maisie |
33.9% | 3741 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 3 | Grom |
33.8% | 5012 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Jacky |
32.8% | 4984 | 83 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 3 | Mr. P |
32.5% | 3469 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 1 | Buster |
31.8% | 4136 | 80 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Ollie |
30.1% | 1948 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 3 | Lily |
28.8% | 3755 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Cordelius |
28.6% | 3403 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 2 | Otis |
28.5% | 3147 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Bonnie |
28.4% | 2890 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Bea |
28.0% | 4636 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 1 | Charlie |
27.2% | 3036 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
27.2% | 6061 | 85 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
23.8% | 3250 | 76 | 0.4% | Rather not |