
Hot Zone
161,323 battles collected on this map.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 56 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,496 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 708 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,496 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 708 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (6 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
73.5% | 16562 | 100 | 1.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Hank |
70.9% | 9378 | 92 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Bolt |
68.7% | 6943 | 88 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Nori |
67.0% | 18303 | 100 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Starr Nova |
65.0% | 9807 | 93 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Bo |
63.1% | 25641 | 100 | 2.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Damian |
64.0% | 3416 | 77 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Chuck |
62.9% | 10244 | 93 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Doug |
63.7% | 4138 | 80 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Draco |
64.2% | 2744 | 74 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Trunk |
64.2% | 2168 | 70 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | – | Sirius |
62.3% | 9559 | 92 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | – | Mina |
62.4% | 5252 | 83 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | – | Finx |
62.6% | 3157 | 76 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | – | Jae-Yong |
63.9% | 1441 | 64 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | – | Sprout |
61.9% | 2664 | 73 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 17 | – | Glowy |
61.6% | 3043 | 75 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 1 | R-T |
63.0% | 1358 | 63 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 1 | Pierce |
60.1% | 11639 | 95 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 20 | – | Moe |
61.9% | 2126 | 70 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 21 | – | Kaze |
61.1% | 2807 | 74 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 22 | – | Amber |
60.0% | 5483 | 84 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 23 | – | Lumi |
60.0% | 4184 | 80 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 24 | – | Gray |
59.4% | 7521 | 89 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 25 | – | Chester |
59.6% | 4169 | 80 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 26 | – | Juju |
60.8% | 1645 | 66 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 27 | – | Ziggy |
59.2% | 3575 | 78 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 1 | Nani |
59.2% | 3601 | 78 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
58.8% | 4513 | 81 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | – | Lola |
59.6% | 2117 | 70 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | – | Shade |
58.8% | 3034 | 75 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | – | Gigi |
59.1% | 1860 | 68 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▲ 1 | Sam |
58.7% | 2026 | 69 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▼ 1 | Ruffs |
58.8% | 1902 | 68 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | – | Tick |
56.2% | 76076 | 100 | 8.4% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | – | Gus |
57.6% | 3036 | 75 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 37 | – | Kenji |
55.8% | 27261 | 100 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 38 | – | Meeple |
57.0% | 2372 | 71 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 39 | – | Griff |
54.9% | 25235 | 100 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 40 | – | Janet |
57.0% | 1891 | 68 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 41 | ▲ 1 | Angelo |
57.3% | 1409 | 64 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 42 | ▼ 1 | Alli |
57.5% | 1088 | 60 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 43 | – | Najia |
56.4% | 1839 | 68 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 44 | – | Emz |
53.9% | 37375 | 100 | 3.9% | Good pick | ||
| 45 | – | Mico |
56.0% | 1583 | 65 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 46 | – | Jessie |
53.2% | 21090 | 100 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Kit |
53.6% | 6992 | 88 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Bibi |
53.0% | 21719 | 100 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Meg |
52.8% | 18390 | 100 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Mortis |
52.7% | 17899 | 100 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 51 | – | Berry |
51.9% | 17693 | 100 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 52 | – | Penny |
51.6% | 23821 | 100 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 53 | – | Mandy |
51.9% | 7025 | 88 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 54 | – | Lou |
50.9% | 11934 | 96 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Nita |
50.6% | 14016 | 98 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 56 | – | Squeak |
49.7% | 22916 | 100 | 2.6% | Solid | ||
| 57 | – | Willow |
50.9% | 1517 | 65 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 58 | – | Tara |
49.2% | 6801 | 87 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 59 | – | Pam |
47.7% | 5435 | 84 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 60 | – | Poco |
46.6% | 16780 | 100 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Ash |
45.9% | 6740 | 87 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Eve |
46.1% | 4729 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Fang |
45.4% | 9761 | 93 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Spike |
44.5% | 14407 | 98 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Colette |
44.3% | 9227 | 92 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Barley |
44.2% | 12900 | 97 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Gale |
43.8% | 7395 | 88 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Melodie |
43.9% | 6096 | 86 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Edgar |
42.9% | 28678 | 100 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Frank |
42.7% | 15467 | 99 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Crow |
42.7% | 14233 | 98 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Dynamike |
42.5% | 19865 | 100 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
42.2% | 12543 | 96 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
42.5% | 5190 | 83 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Carl |
41.3% | 8180 | 90 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Bull |
40.4% | 9363 | 92 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | 8-Bit |
39.9% | 16215 | 100 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Piper |
40.0% | 7082 | 88 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Pearl |
40.0% | 5033 | 83 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Sandy |
39.8% | 7506 | 89 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Brock |
39.3% | 14896 | 99 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Max |
39.5% | 7231 | 88 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Rosa |
39.1% | 6287 | 86 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Surge |
38.5% | 11976 | 96 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Rico |
37.8% | 10645 | 94 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Clancy |
37.0% | 5774 | 85 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Belle |
36.8% | 3478 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Shelly |
36.5% | 9260 | 92 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Leon |
36.3% | 5364 | 84 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Colt |
34.8% | 11715 | 95 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Byron |
34.3% | 8347 | 90 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Grom |
34.3% | 5405 | 84 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Buzz |
34.1% | 3663 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Maisie |
33.9% | 4031 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Mr. P |
32.6% | 3710 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Jacky |
32.4% | 5366 | 84 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Buster |
31.9% | 4462 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Ollie |
29.9% | 2082 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Lily |
28.9% | 4037 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 1 | Cordelius |
28.6% | 3664 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
28.6% | 3396 | 77 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Bonnie |
28.2% | 3089 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Bea |
28.0% | 4968 | 83 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Charlie |
27.6% | 3266 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Darryl |
27.2% | 6504 | 87 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
23.6% | 3499 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not |