
Hot Zone
26,635 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 47 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,904 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 853 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,904 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 853 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (414 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
71.2% | 2476 | 72 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Trunk |
70.1% | 2559 | 73 | 1.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
66.6% | 7583 | 89 | 3.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | R-T |
67.7% | 1971 | 69 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Doug |
64.4% | 4643 | 81 | 2.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Juju |
64.0% | 3390 | 77 | 2.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 1 | Starr Nova |
64.2% | 1896 | 68 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
63.8% | 2120 | 70 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Hank |
63.2% | 2524 | 72 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Shade |
61.2% | 5315 | 84 | 3.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Ziggy |
63.4% | 719 | 54 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 4 | Gigi |
62.7% | 708 | 53 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 2 | Meeple |
60.7% | 1316 | 63 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 2 | Damian |
61.9% | 866 | 56 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
62.1% | 787 | 55 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 3 | Willow |
60.8% | 1070 | 60 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Bolt |
61.0% | 706 | 53 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Mico |
57.6% | 2361 | 71 | 1.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Lumi |
59.5% | 870 | 56 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Kaze |
58.0% | 1165 | 61 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Stu |
57.1% | 1189 | 61 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 3 | Kit |
57.1% | 1083 | 60 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Finx |
60.4% | 376 | 44 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Chuck |
57.0% | 893 | 57 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 3 | Ash |
56.0% | 1334 | 63 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 1 | Chester |
57.0% | 712 | 53 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Gray |
57.7% | 506 | 48 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 28 | – | Kenji |
53.4% | 4391 | 81 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 1 | Bo |
54.2% | 1432 | 64 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 2 | Sprout |
55.6% | 617 | 51 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 4 | Larry & Lawrie |
53.1% | 2105 | 70 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 1 | Moe |
57.8% | 325 | 42 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 1 | Bibi |
52.3% | 4478 | 81 | 3.3% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 3 | Ruffs |
56.4% | 427 | 46 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 3 | Jacky |
53.0% | 1892 | 68 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 7 | Najia |
57.2% | 299 | 40 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Sam |
55.9% | 392 | 45 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 2 | Mortis |
52.5% | 1589 | 65 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 1 | Surge |
51.2% | 5038 | 83 | 2.9% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 1 | Draco |
54.6% | 452 | 47 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Barley |
50.6% | 3677 | 78 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 1 | Amber |
53.3% | 567 | 50 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 1 | Alli |
54.1% | 412 | 45 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Pierce |
52.4% | 521 | 49 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Jae-Yong |
56.1% | 157 | 31 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 46 | – | Buzz |
49.5% | 1506 | 65 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Berry |
48.4% | 2864 | 74 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 1 | Meg |
48.1% | 2787 | 74 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Glowy |
51.6% | 283 | 40 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 1 | Lou |
48.4% | 1729 | 67 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 51 | – | Angelo |
53.1% | 145 | 30 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | – | Nita |
47.3% | 2390 | 72 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | – | Cordelius |
47.8% | 1348 | 63 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | – | Bull |
47.2% | 1745 | 67 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 4 | Gus |
48.5% | 340 | 42 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 1 | Janet |
49.5% | 184 | 33 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
48.8% | 242 | 37 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 2 | Nani |
47.7% | 306 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 1 | Edgar |
44.2% | 6220 | 86 | 4.3% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 3 | Mandy |
45.8% | 308 | 41 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 1 | Dynamike |
43.8% | 3499 | 77 | 2.4% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 1 | Griff |
43.8% | 2539 | 72 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 2 | Tick |
43.4% | 5040 | 83 | 3.2% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | El Primo |
41.7% | 1972 | 69 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Squeak |
41.5% | 1539 | 65 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Pearl |
41.3% | 727 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Emz |
40.6% | 3775 | 78 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 1 | Carl |
40.5% | 1095 | 60 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 1 | Rosa |
40.3% | 884 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Spike |
39.6% | 1592 | 65 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Penny |
39.3% | 1846 | 68 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Lily |
39.3% | 893 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Rico |
39.2% | 1708 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Pam |
38.8% | 805 | 55 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Shelly |
38.5% | 1620 | 66 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 1 | Melodie |
37.9% | 647 | 52 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 2 | Max |
37.9% | 770 | 55 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 2 | 8-Bit |
38.0% | 1888 | 68 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Frank |
38.0% | 1725 | 67 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 4 | Sandy |
37.5% | 863 | 56 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Brock |
37.4% | 1873 | 68 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 2 | Mr. P |
36.9% | 636 | 52 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 1 | Ollie |
35.2% | 304 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 2 | Fang |
36.9% | 1147 | 61 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 5 | Tara |
36.5% | 958 | 58 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 1 | Belle |
35.3% | 391 | 44 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 5 | Leon |
36.2% | 858 | 56 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 2 | Gale |
36.0% | 956 | 58 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Otis |
35.5% | 723 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 2 | Eve |
34.0% | 421 | 46 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Jessie |
35.0% | 2018 | 69 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Maisie |
32.4% | 518 | 49 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 4 | Colette |
33.3% | 936 | 58 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 2 | Grom |
32.8% | 738 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 2 | Bonnie |
30.8% | 357 | 43 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
32.6% | 911 | 57 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 3 | Buster |
30.9% | 463 | 47 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 1 | Clancy |
30.7% | 590 | 51 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 2 | Poco |
31.8% | 1574 | 65 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 2 | Piper |
30.2% | 543 | 49 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
31.6% | 1481 | 64 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▲ 1 | Crow |
31.1% | 1493 | 65 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 1 | Charlie |
28.2% | 412 | 45 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Bea |
28.6% | 601 | 51 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Byron |
28.5% | 726 | 54 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
22.3% | 449 | 47 | 0.3% | Rather not |