
Hot Zone
25,302 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 48 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 6,633 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 553 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 6,633 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 553 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (332 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▲ 2 | Wendy |
71.7% | 2377 | 71 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | ▼ 1 | Trunk |
70.1% | 2419 | 72 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▼ 1 | Nori |
66.7% | 7233 | 88 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 3 | R-T |
67.3% | 1868 | 68 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Doug |
64.3% | 4426 | 81 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 2 | Juju |
63.6% | 3226 | 76 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 3 | Sirius |
64.0% | 2012 | 69 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Starr Nova |
64.1% | 1840 | 68 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 3 | Hank |
63.2% | 2442 | 72 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 1 | Shade |
61.4% | 5047 | 83 | 1.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 1 | Ziggy |
63.1% | 697 | 53 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
62.2% | 826 | 56 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 5 | Willow |
61.5% | 1012 | 59 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 2 | Mina |
62.3% | 749 | 54 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 4 | Meeple |
60.6% | 1243 | 62 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 1 | Gigi |
62.5% | 667 | 52 | 0.0% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 3 | Bolt |
61.2% | 673 | 53 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 3 | Mico |
57.8% | 2227 | 71 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 8 | Lumi |
59.8% | 839 | 56 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Kaze |
57.9% | 1132 | 60 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
56.8% | 1150 | 61 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 3 | Finx |
60.8% | 367 | 44 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 3 | Ash |
56.5% | 1277 | 62 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 17 | Chuck |
57.2% | 859 | 56 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 3 | Kit |
56.4% | 1028 | 59 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 2 | Gray |
58.4% | 490 | 48 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▲ 3 | Chester |
57.0% | 675 | 53 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 5 | Kenji |
53.5% | 4216 | 80 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▼ 5 | Najia |
59.4% | 278 | 39 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 13 | Bo |
54.1% | 1363 | 63 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 9 | Ruffs |
57.0% | 412 | 45 | 16.9% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 7 | Sprout |
55.3% | 589 | 51 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 2 | Moe |
57.6% | 314 | 41 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 2 | Bibi |
52.1% | 4221 | 80 | 2.4% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
52.5% | 2008 | 69 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 2 | Mortis |
52.9% | 1480 | 64 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Sam |
56.1% | 360 | 43 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 17 | Jacky |
52.2% | 1782 | 67 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 3 | Draco |
55.2% | 433 | 46 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 7 | Surge |
51.0% | 4805 | 82 | 1.7% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 9 | Barley |
50.6% | 3517 | 77 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 13 | Alli |
54.0% | 387 | 44 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 17 | Amber |
52.8% | 530 | 49 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 8 | Pierce |
52.6% | 500 | 48 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
57.2% | 152 | 30 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 5 | Buzz |
49.1% | 1437 | 64 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 2 | Berry |
48.4% | 2707 | 73 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 2 | Lou |
48.7% | 1670 | 66 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 11 | Meg |
48.0% | 2711 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 4 | Glowy |
51.3% | 261 | 38 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 4 | Angelo |
53.5% | 142 | 29 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 3 | Nita |
47.4% | 2270 | 71 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 4 | Cordelius |
47.6% | 1279 | 62 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 8 | Bull |
47.3% | 1626 | 66 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▲ 13 | Janet |
50.3% | 169 | 32 | 6.9% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
48.1% | 291 | 40 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 4 | Mandy |
47.9% | 286 | 40 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 10 | Lola |
47.8% | 224 | 36 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 6 | Gus |
46.7% | 319 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 4 | Edgar |
44.2% | 5893 | 85 | 3.2% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 1 | Tick |
43.6% | 4772 | 82 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 3 | Dynamike |
43.6% | 3302 | 76 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 5 | Griff |
43.7% | 2399 | 72 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 2 | El Primo |
41.2% | 1829 | 68 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
41.1% | 1433 | 64 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 11 | Pearl |
40.9% | 694 | 53 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 3 | Emz |
40.4% | 3573 | 78 | 2.2% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 3 | Rosa |
40.4% | 836 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 6 | Carl |
40.4% | 1035 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 9 | Spike |
39.7% | 1505 | 65 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 21 | Penny |
39.5% | 1754 | 67 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 9 | Rico |
39.2% | 1635 | 66 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 2 | Lily |
39.1% | 841 | 56 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Pam |
38.8% | 758 | 54 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 24 | Shelly |
38.3% | 1539 | 65 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 19 | 8-Bit |
38.2% | 1796 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 2 | Melodie |
37.6% | 614 | 51 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 9 | Max |
37.4% | 713 | 53 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Frank |
37.6% | 1631 | 66 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 13 | Mr. P |
37.1% | 598 | 51 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 9 | Brock |
37.2% | 1762 | 67 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 3 | Leon |
36.4% | 811 | 55 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 11 | Ollie |
34.4% | 288 | 40 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Sandy |
36.2% | 814 | 55 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 2 | Gale |
36.1% | 924 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 16 | Fang |
36.2% | 1093 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Belle |
34.7% | 360 | 43 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 5 | Eve |
34.8% | 394 | 45 | 16.2% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Otis |
35.5% | 692 | 53 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 7 | Tara |
35.3% | 895 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 5 | Jessie |
35.2% | 1904 | 68 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 12 | Maisie |
33.8% | 479 | 48 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 11 | Bonnie |
31.2% | 340 | 42 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 18 | Buster |
31.8% | 443 | 46 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 5 | Darryl |
32.9% | 855 | 56 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 2 | Grom |
32.3% | 702 | 53 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 7 | Colette |
32.7% | 885 | 57 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 10 | Clancy |
31.5% | 565 | 50 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 5 | Piper |
31.1% | 518 | 49 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▲ 3 | Colt |
31.6% | 1422 | 64 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 6 | Charlie |
28.6% | 398 | 45 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▲ 1 | Crow |
31.3% | 1417 | 64 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 2 | Poco |
31.3% | 1488 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 6 | Bea |
29.3% | 564 | 50 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 14 | Byron |
28.9% | 685 | 53 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
21.5% | 424 | 46 | 0.3% | Rather not |