
Gem Grab
136,384 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 25 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,433 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 233 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,433 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 233 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (229 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
64.6% | 14485 | 99 | 1.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Wendy |
58.3% | 131380 | 100 | 16.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Bo |
58.3% | 31633 | 100 | 3.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Starr Nova |
57.0% | 12097 | 96 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Clancy |
55.2% | 3123 | 76 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 6 | – | Griff |
53.7% | 35623 | 100 | 4.4% | Good pick | ||
| 7 | – | Damian |
54.7% | 4681 | 82 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 8 | – | Juju |
54.8% | 1731 | 67 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 9 | – | Eve |
53.8% | 2943 | 75 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 1 | Nori |
52.4% | 28242 | 100 | 3.5% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 1 | Surge |
52.4% | 21239 | 100 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Mortis |
52.4% | 18563 | 100 | 2.3% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 2 | Mina |
53.5% | 2493 | 72 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Fang |
52.3% | 13082 | 97 | 1.6% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 1 | Edgar |
51.5% | 79935 | 100 | 9.8% | Solid | ||
| 16 | – | 8-Bit |
51.5% | 13010 | 97 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 17 | ▲ 1 | Ash |
53.0% | 1182 | 61 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 18 | ▼ 1 | Jessie |
50.9% | 10363 | 94 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 19 | – | Carl |
50.6% | 4541 | 81 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 20 | ▲ 2 | Lumi |
51.5% | 1698 | 66 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 21 | – | Tick |
49.8% | 20089 | 100 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 22 | ▲ 2 | Pierce |
50.3% | 5643 | 84 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▼ 3 | Shade |
50.7% | 3423 | 77 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▲ 1 | Bibi |
49.7% | 12058 | 96 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▼ 2 | Emz |
49.3% | 39124 | 100 | 4.8% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▲ 1 | Stu |
50.2% | 4760 | 82 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Alli |
50.6% | 2587 | 73 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 28 | – | Crow |
48.5% | 24809 | 100 | 3.0% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 1 | Chester |
48.8% | 5984 | 85 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 1 | Doug |
49.4% | 1894 | 68 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 2 | Mico |
49.3% | 2010 | 69 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▲ 1 | Ruffs |
50.5% | 721 | 54 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Angelo |
49.3% | 1605 | 66 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 1 | Janet |
49.5% | 1244 | 62 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Kit |
47.7% | 4118 | 80 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 36 | ▲ 1 | Najia |
47.8% | 2151 | 70 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 37 | ▲ 1 | Penny |
46.9% | 7042 | 88 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 38 | ▲ 3 | Gigi |
48.6% | 945 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 39 | ▼ 3 | Lily |
47.1% | 4807 | 82 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 40 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
46.6% | 5524 | 84 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 41 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
46.6% | 5215 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 42 | ▲ 4 | R-T |
48.5% | 476 | 47 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▼ 1 | Spike |
45.2% | 13559 | 98 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | ▲ 1 | Finx |
46.9% | 885 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | ▲ 3 | Meeple |
46.1% | 2005 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | ▼ 3 | Bull |
45.3% | 6149 | 86 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | – | Chuck |
46.7% | 821 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | ▼ 4 | Nita |
45.1% | 5102 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | ▲ 4 | Max |
45.1% | 4416 | 81 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 5 | Moe |
46.3% | 773 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 2 | Brock |
44.1% | 20342 | 100 | 2.5% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▼ 2 | Rico |
44.2% | 13017 | 97 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 1 | Pearl |
45.0% | 2534 | 72 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 2 | Otis |
44.5% | 4592 | 81 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 4 | Leon |
44.0% | 9423 | 92 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 1 | Meg |
43.5% | 5059 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▼ 1 | Gray |
44.0% | 1781 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 1 | Mandy |
43.5% | 4100 | 80 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 1 | Poco |
43.3% | 4715 | 82 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Trunk |
44.3% | 760 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Kenji |
42.7% | 6556 | 87 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 3 | Glowy |
43.7% | 719 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Amber |
43.0% | 2084 | 70 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | – | Colt |
42.1% | 14685 | 99 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 3 | Frank |
42.3% | 7356 | 88 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Lola |
43.2% | 696 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Lou |
42.2% | 2806 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 3 | Draco |
42.8% | 579 | 50 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Kaze |
42.4% | 1624 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 2 | Mr. P |
42.5% | 1000 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▼ 1 | Gus |
41.8% | 1536 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Ollie |
40.5% | 220 | 36 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Charlie |
40.8% | 1800 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Buzz |
40.5% | 3655 | 78 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Sandy |
40.4% | 2643 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Gale |
40.2% | 3707 | 78 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Buster |
39.5% | 410 | 45 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Dynamike |
38.9% | 10990 | 94 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Squeak |
38.9% | 6642 | 87 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 2 | Bea |
39.0% | 3086 | 75 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Cordelius |
39.0% | 2811 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 2 | Byron |
38.8% | 5328 | 84 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Sprout |
39.0% | 1068 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Colette |
38.5% | 8399 | 90 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Darryl |
38.5% | 3394 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Ziggy |
38.1% | 493 | 48 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Pam |
37.9% | 875 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 2 | Maisie |
37.8% | 1553 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
37.1% | 960 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 4 | Sam |
35.2% | 318 | 41 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 1 | Belle |
36.9% | 1809 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Nani |
36.7% | 1454 | 64 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 2 | Rosa |
36.5% | 1226 | 62 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
36.1% | 965 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 1 | Piper |
36.0% | 5811 | 85 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Willow |
35.5% | 671 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Hank |
34.0% | 430 | 46 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Gene |
34.7% | 1761 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Shelly |
33.7% | 5490 | 84 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Bonnie |
32.9% | 790 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Jae-Yong |
28.6% | 224 | 36 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Grom |
31.9% | 3087 | 75 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | El Primo |
30.5% | 3034 | 75 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Jacky |
27.8% | 1265 | 62 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Berry |
26.8% | 2067 | 69 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Barley |
26.6% | 1921 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not |