
Gem Grab
147,775 battles collected on this map — ranked only.
OPEN — more choice than on most maps: 44 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,056 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 299 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,056 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 299 real line-ups from a different rank tier, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (1,160 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here. The numbers also come from the solo queue: the battles behind them were fought by three strangers, not a practised team.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bolt |
64.5% | 11424 | 95 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Clancy |
63.4% | 2996 | 75 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Bo |
56.8% | 26299 | 100 | 3.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Ash |
57.3% | 3429 | 77 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Doug |
56.9% | 3510 | 77 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Griff |
55.5% | 33685 | 100 | 4.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Bull |
55.3% | 9407 | 92 | 1.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Surge |
54.6% | 19230 | 100 | 2.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 1 | Tara |
54.9% | 6726 | 87 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Starr Nova |
54.3% | 15561 | 100 | 2.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Otis |
54.4% | 6085 | 86 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 1 | Bibi |
53.9% | 11340 | 95 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 1 | Damian |
55.1% | 2664 | 73 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | – | Fang |
53.7% | 11528 | 95 | 1.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | – | Chester |
53.6% | 9106 | 92 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▼ 1 | R-T |
57.0% | 653 | 52 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 1 | Pearl |
54.0% | 3309 | 76 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Mina |
53.9% | 3507 | 77 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Stu |
53.0% | 8959 | 91 | 1.2% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 1 | Nita |
52.9% | 4782 | 82 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 1 | Jessie |
52.7% | 5152 | 83 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 2 | Janet |
54.2% | 1276 | 62 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Edgar |
51.4% | 84071 | 100 | 11.1% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Crow |
51.6% | 22231 | 100 | 2.9% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 2 | Buster |
57.0% | 384 | 44 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 2 | Carl |
52.1% | 4128 | 80 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Rico |
51.0% | 23011 | 100 | 3.0% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▼ 1 | Mortis |
50.7% | 30780 | 100 | 4.1% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | – | Emz |
50.5% | 36812 | 100 | 4.9% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▲ 1 | Charlie |
52.0% | 2353 | 71 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | – | 8-Bit |
50.7% | 10893 | 94 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Gale |
51.8% | 2348 | 71 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | – | Moe |
52.7% | 1024 | 59 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Ruffs |
52.3% | 1183 | 61 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 1 | Lily |
50.4% | 8398 | 90 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 36 | – | Trunk |
49.8% | 20387 | 100 | 2.7% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 1 | Meg |
50.4% | 5170 | 83 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Penny |
50.5% | 3729 | 78 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Rosa |
50.4% | 2000 | 69 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 40 | – | Sam |
52.9% | 471 | 47 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Finx |
51.4% | 908 | 57 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Kenji |
49.3% | 7504 | 89 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 43 | – | Darryl |
49.8% | 2865 | 74 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Nori |
48.0% | 71239 | 100 | 9.4% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Tick |
48.7% | 7721 | 89 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 46 | – | Cordelius |
48.7% | 5504 | 84 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Alli |
49.1% | 3362 | 77 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Spike |
48.3% | 9144 | 92 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Sandy |
49.2% | 2130 | 70 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 2 | Gus |
49.3% | 1993 | 69 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 51 | – | Gray |
49.3% | 1612 | 66 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 52 | – | Poco |
48.7% | 2757 | 74 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▲ 2 | Maisie |
49.8% | 1027 | 59 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▼ 1 | Lumi |
48.5% | 2334 | 71 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▲ 2 | Lola |
50.3% | 581 | 50 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▲ 2 | Pierce |
48.1% | 3255 | 76 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▲ 1 | Mico |
48.4% | 1990 | 69 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 58 | – | Ollie |
52.9% | 189 | 34 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▼ 1 | Max |
47.4% | 6477 | 86 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 60 | ▼ 3 | Gigi |
49.1% | 867 | 56 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 61 | – | Kit |
47.4% | 3926 | 79 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 62 | – | Chuck |
48.6% | 884 | 57 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 63 | – | Mr. P |
48.4% | 1002 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 1 | Buzz |
47.1% | 3634 | 78 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
47.0% | 3236 | 76 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 1 | Meeple |
46.9% | 2990 | 75 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | – | Lou |
47.4% | 1607 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 1 | Hank |
48.3% | 472 | 47 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 3 | Draco |
47.8% | 672 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Leon |
45.8% | 8995 | 91 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Frank |
45.9% | 5901 | 85 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
47.4% | 753 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Amber |
46.5% | 1372 | 63 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 5 | Juju |
50.4% | 115 | 26 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 1 | Shelly |
45.4% | 6802 | 87 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Colt |
45.0% | 10679 | 94 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
45.6% | 1815 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Brock |
44.5% | 15138 | 99 | 2.0% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Colette |
44.8% | 6213 | 86 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 1 | Jacky |
46.0% | 910 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Pam |
45.5% | 899 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Shade |
44.5% | 2543 | 72 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | El Primo |
44.1% | 2817 | 74 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Najia |
44.3% | 1308 | 63 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Mandy |
43.2% | 2107 | 70 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
41.7% | 35323 | 100 | 4.7% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
43.3% | 252 | 38 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Eve |
42.9% | 520 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Byron |
42.0% | 4064 | 79 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | Ziggy |
41.9% | 303 | 41 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Dynamike |
41.0% | 4551 | 81 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 3 | Melodie |
41.5% | 754 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 1 | Willow |
40.3% | 14466 | 98 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 3 | Angelo |
40.4% | 208 | 35 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
40.3% | 3896 | 79 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 1 | Belle |
40.5% | 934 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Nani |
39.8% | 1066 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Gene |
38.8% | 1058 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Piper |
37.8% | 3093 | 75 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Sprout |
37.3% | 584 | 50 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Bonnie |
36.2% | 580 | 50 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Grom |
36.3% | 783 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
35.3% | 798 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 1 | Berry |
35.3% | 834 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Barley |
32.4% | 784 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not |