
Heist
180,658 battles collected on this map — ranked only.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 16 of 103 brawlers above 50%.
Long rounds Median 99 s out of 80–99 s in this mode. An early lead is rarely enough; the round is long enough to claw it back.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,632 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 870 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,632 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 870 real line-ups from a different rank tier, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (356 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here. The numbers also come from the solo queue: the battles behind them were fought by three strangers, not a practised team.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Chuck |
65.2% | 34270 | 100 | 3.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Mico |
61.1% | 22672 | 100 | 2.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Jessie |
59.7% | 38576 | 100 | 4.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Penny |
57.5% | 29795 | 100 | 3.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Bolt |
58.5% | 4658 | 82 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Carl |
56.8% | 9519 | 92 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Nori |
55.9% | 92852 | 100 | 10.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Bull |
55.4% | 9678 | 92 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Melodie |
54.8% | 5765 | 85 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Edgar |
53.3% | 90373 | 100 | 9.7% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Nita |
52.8% | 18238 | 100 | 2.0% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Eve |
54.2% | 2263 | 71 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Sam |
58.5% | 306 | 41 | 0.0% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | 8-Bit |
51.4% | 39851 | 100 | 4.3% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Griff |
50.1% | 27212 | 100 | 2.9% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Bo |
49.9% | 18123 | 100 | 1.9% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Starr Nova |
50.0% | 8180 | 90 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | – | Bibi |
50.1% | 4926 | 82 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | – | Colt |
48.9% | 60719 | 100 | 6.5% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 1 | Darryl |
50.0% | 3513 | 77 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Colette |
49.0% | 22640 | 100 | 2.4% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Pierce |
49.2% | 9796 | 93 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 1 | Mandy |
48.8% | 17924 | 100 | 1.9% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Lily |
49.1% | 3823 | 79 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | – | Belle |
49.1% | 3408 | 77 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 26 | – | Cordelius |
49.3% | 2549 | 73 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Brock |
47.6% | 56222 | 100 | 6.0% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
48.6% | 4315 | 80 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 29 | – | Doug |
49.6% | 1214 | 61 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | Gigi |
49.8% | 919 | 57 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 31 | – | R-T |
49.5% | 893 | 57 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Clancy |
48.9% | 1217 | 61 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Shade |
47.5% | 4421 | 81 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Juju |
50.0% | 474 | 47 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Trunk |
46.3% | 13898 | 98 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 36 | – | Kaze |
45.7% | 46110 | 100 | 4.9% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Fang |
46.1% | 5289 | 83 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Emz |
45.5% | 21813 | 100 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 39 | – | Rico |
45.2% | 25509 | 100 | 2.7% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 1 | Lumi |
46.0% | 2352 | 71 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 1 | Ruffs |
47.4% | 500 | 48 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 1 | Grom |
45.4% | 1727 | 67 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 43 | – | Crow |
44.2% | 21317 | 100 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Buzz |
44.7% | 2683 | 73 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Berry |
44.7% | 2805 | 74 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 1 | Gale |
45.2% | 1331 | 63 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 47 | – | Nani |
44.4% | 3329 | 77 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Alli |
45.7% | 519 | 49 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Lola |
45.0% | 901 | 57 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Mina |
45.0% | 694 | 53 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 51 | – | Amber |
43.5% | 3296 | 76 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 52 | – | Angelo |
43.5% | 2892 | 74 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 53 | – | Moe |
44.2% | 394 | 45 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 54 | – | Sirius |
43.0% | 3714 | 78 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Buster |
43.8% | 96 | 23 | 0.0% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
42.4% | 3128 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Finx |
42.7% | 447 | 46 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | – | Najia |
42.2% | 2216 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | – | Chester |
42.1% | 2719 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Kit |
41.8% | 1314 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Spike |
40.8% | 9654 | 92 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 1 | Gray |
41.3% | 852 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Kenji |
40.9% | 2757 | 74 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 1 | Draco |
41.1% | 521 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▲ 1 | Piper |
40.2% | 8102 | 90 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Damian |
40.9% | 582 | 50 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 2 | Janet |
40.7% | 369 | 44 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Stu |
40.5% | 1785 | 67 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Sprout |
40.2% | 1089 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 1 | Surge |
39.7% | 5382 | 84 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Jae-Yong |
37.0% | 127 | 28 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Glowy |
40.0% | 712 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Pearl |
40.0% | 1694 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Byron |
39.5% | 4929 | 82 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Mortis |
39.2% | 3922 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 1 | Meg |
39.2% | 2965 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Ollie |
27.3% | 55 | 15 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Maisie |
38.7% | 729 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | – | Ziggy |
38.1% | 399 | 45 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Bea |
38.6% | 1965 | 69 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Tick |
38.2% | 5637 | 84 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Max |
38.1% | 3513 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
37.8% | 6092 | 86 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 1 | Charlie |
38.0% | 987 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 1 | Mr. P |
37.3% | 823 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 1 | Frank |
36.9% | 5232 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Gus |
36.0% | 883 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 1 | Hank |
33.5% | 266 | 39 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | – | Willow |
35.7% | 14780 | 99 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | Poco |
35.8% | 987 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Lou |
35.7% | 1223 | 62 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Ash |
35.0% | 782 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 2 | Dynamike |
35.2% | 5247 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | – | Bonnie |
34.8% | 813 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Barley |
35.2% | 1467 | 64 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Tara |
35.0% | 1544 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Meeple |
32.5% | 631 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Leon |
32.4% | 3103 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Larry & Lawrie |
31.6% | 1108 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Sandy |
28.2% | 496 | 48 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Pam |
28.2% | 600 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Jacky |
27.8% | 608 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Shelly |
29.3% | 3429 | 77 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Rosa |
26.3% | 590 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Gene |
12.4% | 482 | 48 | 0.1% | Rather not |