
Hot Zone
82,665 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 48 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 5,928 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 512 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 5,928 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 512 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (102 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
76.8% | 14070 | 98 | 2.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Bolt |
71.6% | 7512 | 89 | 1.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Nori |
68.5% | 12705 | 97 | 2.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
69.6% | 2551 | 73 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▼ 1 | Starr Nova |
68.0% | 6072 | 86 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 2 | Glowy |
66.0% | 3982 | 79 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 3 | Doug |
65.7% | 2634 | 73 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 1 | Draco |
65.7% | 2265 | 71 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 3 | Chuck |
63.6% | 5900 | 85 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 1 | Finx |
63.2% | 3629 | 78 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | Bo |
61.3% | 15386 | 99 | 2.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 11 | Trunk |
62.9% | 1506 | 65 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 5 | Chester |
60.0% | 2800 | 74 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Mina |
59.2% | 3820 | 79 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 14 | Hank |
61.0% | 1249 | 62 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 4 | Amber |
59.0% | 3176 | 76 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
58.7% | 3919 | 79 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
59.3% | 2288 | 71 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▲ 5 | Gray |
58.8% | 2972 | 75 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 7 | Sprout |
59.3% | 2036 | 69 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 7 | Pierce |
57.7% | 8834 | 91 | 1.4% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 10 | Lumi |
58.4% | 3825 | 79 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 14 | Jae-Yong |
60.0% | 1133 | 60 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 3 | R-T |
60.6% | 875 | 57 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 3 | Sirius |
58.0% | 2734 | 74 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 11 | Griff |
56.0% | 14001 | 98 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 10 | Meg |
56.1% | 10495 | 94 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 12 | Juju |
59.9% | 725 | 54 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▲ 6 | Ziggy |
57.7% | 1566 | 65 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▼ 4 | Ruffs |
57.6% | 1491 | 64 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▼ 9 | Gigi |
57.3% | 1254 | 62 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▲ 12 | Lola |
57.1% | 1318 | 63 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▲ 10 | Sam |
58.0% | 684 | 53 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▲ 4 | Janet |
57.1% | 799 | 55 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 35 | ▼ 5 | Poco |
53.6% | 13538 | 98 | 3.3% | Good pick | ||
| 36 | ▲ 4 | Najia |
55.1% | 1633 | 66 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 3 | Lou |
53.4% | 9282 | 92 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 7 | Moe |
55.8% | 1097 | 60 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 9 | Pam |
53.4% | 4727 | 82 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 9 | Meeple |
54.8% | 1425 | 64 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 4 | Mortis |
52.2% | 6205 | 86 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 19 | Shade |
54.2% | 1014 | 59 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 18 | 8-Bit |
51.5% | 15608 | 100 | 3.0% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 2 | Emz |
51.2% | 16571 | 100 | 3.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 6 | Jessie |
50.6% | 10577 | 94 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 5 | Mico |
53.9% | 622 | 51 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 19 | Gus |
51.5% | 1479 | 64 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 16 | Sandy |
50.2% | 4608 | 81 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 15 | Kenji |
49.4% | 7732 | 89 | 1.4% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 3 | Fang |
48.9% | 8284 | 90 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 1 | Tick |
47.9% | 22938 | 100 | 4.6% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▲ 17 | Mandy |
49.3% | 1967 | 69 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 17 | Ash |
48.9% | 2964 | 75 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▲ 10 | Kit |
49.9% | 1117 | 60 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
48.9% | 1271 | 62 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 4 | Penny |
47.2% | 10666 | 94 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 57 | – | Berry |
46.8% | 7316 | 88 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 2 | Alli |
49.1% | 464 | 47 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 6 | Pearl |
45.9% | 3352 | 77 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 15 | Willow |
47.1% | 816 | 55 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 6 | Belle |
45.6% | 2527 | 72 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Frank |
44.9% | 6516 | 87 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 3 | Tara |
44.9% | 3708 | 78 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 26 | Angelo |
46.3% | 594 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 6 | Nita |
44.6% | 5646 | 84 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 3 | Gale |
44.7% | 3982 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 8 | Bibi |
44.2% | 5736 | 85 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 22 | Clancy |
44.4% | 3416 | 77 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 16 | Max |
43.8% | 4495 | 81 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 2 | Spike |
42.9% | 6752 | 87 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
42.8% | 5388 | 84 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 2 | Barley |
42.7% | 6422 | 86 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▼ 2 | Carl |
41.5% | 4135 | 80 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 4 | Surge |
41.0% | 6617 | 87 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
40.7% | 2858 | 74 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▲ 2 | Crow |
40.3% | 7928 | 89 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 10 | Melodie |
40.6% | 2256 | 71 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 1 | Brock |
39.8% | 8203 | 90 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 2 | Squeak |
39.9% | 6067 | 85 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 10 | Edgar |
39.6% | 12837 | 97 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
39.6% | 2614 | 73 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 9 | Bea |
39.2% | 3729 | 78 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▲ 4 | Byron |
38.7% | 5711 | 85 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 12 | Rico |
37.8% | 5397 | 84 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 4 | Colt |
37.4% | 7349 | 88 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▼ 6 | Rosa |
37.5% | 2679 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 10 | Buzz |
37.4% | 2177 | 70 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 5 | Maisie |
37.3% | 2137 | 70 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 8 | Mr. P |
36.9% | 2036 | 69 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 2 | Buster |
36.8% | 2211 | 70 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 11 | Dynamike |
36.1% | 7090 | 88 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 1 | Piper |
36.2% | 3966 | 79 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▼ 7 | Bull |
36.2% | 3512 | 77 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 5 | Grom |
36.2% | 3250 | 76 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 9 | El Primo |
34.9% | 4397 | 81 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 2 | Jacky |
34.9% | 2529 | 72 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 9 | Eve |
33.2% | 1522 | 65 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 7 | Shelly |
33.0% | 4205 | 80 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▼ 4 | Leon |
32.8% | 2585 | 73 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 16 | Ollie |
32.3% | 1112 | 60 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 16 | Charlie |
32.4% | 1893 | 68 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Lily |
32.0% | 1918 | 68 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 5 | Bonnie |
31.8% | 1632 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 4 | Cordelius |
31.4% | 1811 | 67 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 2 | Darryl |
30.7% | 3106 | 75 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
27.7% | 1860 | 68 | 0.4% | Rather not |