
Bounty
59,779 battles collected on this map.
MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 50 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,849 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 337 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,849 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 337 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (619 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Wendy |
75.8% | 1503 | 65 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | ▲ 4 | Bolt |
63.4% | 3653 | 78 | 1.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▼ 1 | Squeak |
59.0% | 4411 | 81 | 0.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▼ 1 | Tick |
57.8% | 6597 | 87 | 1.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 3 | Mandy |
57.1% | 8209 | 90 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 3 | Bo |
57.7% | 4061 | 79 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 4 | Sprout |
58.1% | 2553 | 73 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 4 | Grom |
57.1% | 4105 | 80 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▼ 2 | Eve |
57.7% | 2234 | 71 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 2 | Juju |
57.6% | 1975 | 69 | 0.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 6 | Belle |
56.3% | 5205 | 83 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 2 | Nani |
56.1% | 5611 | 84 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 3 | Spike |
55.7% | 5319 | 84 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▲ 6 | Pierce |
55.7% | 5253 | 83 | 1.6% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 2 | Najia |
55.8% | 4150 | 80 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 36 | Nori |
55.4% | 4297 | 80 | 2.5% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▼ 4 | Piper |
54.6% | 13370 | 97 | 4.3% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 2 | Janet |
55.9% | 2114 | 70 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 4 | Penny |
54.8% | 4162 | 80 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▼ 2 | Byron |
53.2% | 8135 | 90 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 2 | Brock |
52.4% | 12276 | 96 | 2.7% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 5 | 8-Bit |
52.7% | 5727 | 85 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 5 | Carl |
52.7% | 3989 | 79 | 0.9% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▼ 2 | Leon |
52.3% | 7014 | 88 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 6 | Edgar |
52.1% | 9411 | 92 | 3.4% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▼ 5 | Mr. P |
52.9% | 2921 | 75 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 2 | Pearl |
52.9% | 2548 | 73 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 4 | Crow |
52.1% | 6944 | 88 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 5 | Ziggy |
53.4% | 1505 | 65 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
53.4% | 1383 | 63 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 5 | Angelo |
52.2% | 4097 | 80 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 3 | Mico |
52.2% | 2753 | 74 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 3 | Sirius |
52.0% | 2952 | 75 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 11 | Meeple |
51.9% | 3326 | 77 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 8 | Gray |
51.7% | 3781 | 78 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 4 | Mortis |
51.4% | 5283 | 83 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▲ 16 | Mina |
52.0% | 2059 | 69 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▼ 12 | Bonnie |
51.4% | 3129 | 76 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 2 | Fang |
51.1% | 4294 | 80 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 2 | Ruffs |
51.8% | 1866 | 68 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 8 | Emz |
51.0% | 3763 | 78 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | R-T |
51.7% | 1762 | 67 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
51.3% | 2183 | 70 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 13 | Larry & Lawrie |
51.1% | 2487 | 72 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 6 | Bea |
50.3% | 6566 | 87 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 18 | Starr Nova |
50.4% | 2913 | 75 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 1 | Griff |
50.1% | 3580 | 78 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 7 | Jessie |
50.0% | 3515 | 77 | 0.8% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 1 | Moe |
51.1% | 1221 | 62 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▼ 10 | Charlie |
50.5% | 1759 | 67 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 2 | Finx |
50.1% | 1884 | 68 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 5 | Lily |
49.4% | 3959 | 79 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▼ 2 | Max |
49.3% | 3678 | 78 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▲ 2 | Gus |
48.9% | 5464 | 84 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Lumi |
49.9% | 1646 | 66 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▲ 7 | Kaze |
49.4% | 2245 | 71 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▲ 2 | Kit |
48.7% | 4335 | 80 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▼ 10 | Colette |
48.4% | 4774 | 82 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▼ 5 | Otis |
48.7% | 2668 | 73 | 0.9% | Solid | ||
| 60 | ▲ 7 | Amber |
48.4% | 2181 | 70 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 61 | ▼ 4 | Maisie |
48.1% | 2798 | 74 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▲ 6 | Glowy |
48.6% | 1530 | 65 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 2 | Gene |
47.9% | 3416 | 77 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 4 | Clancy |
48.8% | 1163 | 61 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 7 | Rico |
47.3% | 6337 | 86 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 4 | Colt |
46.9% | 11213 | 95 | 2.7% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 2 | Stu |
47.5% | 3811 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 2 | Surge |
47.1% | 3495 | 77 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 5 | Chester |
46.5% | 2664 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 5 | Kenji |
46.5% | 2175 | 70 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 4 | Willow |
46.4% | 1762 | 67 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 2 | Lou |
46.1% | 1913 | 68 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Meg |
45.9% | 2320 | 71 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 9 | Gigi |
45.9% | 1185 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 3 | Alli |
45.4% | 1941 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 5 | Berry |
45.4% | 1755 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 1 | Dynamike |
44.4% | 4981 | 83 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 6 | Tara |
44.6% | 2284 | 71 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 10 | Shade |
43.9% | 2190 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 5 | Draco |
44.4% | 786 | 55 | 22.3% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 5 | Damian |
43.9% | 938 | 58 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 3 | Buster |
43.3% | 1172 | 61 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 1 | Sandy |
43.0% | 1437 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 4 | Pam |
42.6% | 2089 | 70 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 8 | Melodie |
42.6% | 1668 | 66 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 5 | Frank |
42.0% | 2020 | 69 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 5 | Bibi |
41.6% | 2154 | 70 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 1 | Gale |
41.5% | 1958 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 5 | Cordelius |
41.1% | 2172 | 70 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Buzz |
41.1% | 2241 | 71 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▲ 5 | Poco |
40.6% | 3738 | 78 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 5 | Hank |
41.0% | 1296 | 62 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Sam |
40.9% | 1102 | 60 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 6 | Ash |
40.8% | 1271 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 3 | Chuck |
40.8% | 1163 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 2 | Darryl |
40.1% | 2546 | 73 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 2 | Barley |
39.8% | 3464 | 77 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▼ 17 | Ollie |
39.6% | 947 | 58 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Trunk |
38.9% | 985 | 58 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Doug |
36.8% | 1198 | 61 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▲ 1 | Nita |
34.6% | 3264 | 76 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 1 | Shelly |
34.0% | 3975 | 79 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Jacky |
32.4% | 1479 | 64 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 1 | El Primo |
30.8% | 2721 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
30.8% | 2937 | 75 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Rosa |
29.8% | 2262 | 71 | 0.3% | Rather not |