
Heist
40,124 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 44 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 3,104 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 227 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 3,104 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 227 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (50 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Nori |
68.8% | 19143 | 100 | 8.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Wendy |
74.4% | 727 | 54 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
62.6% | 6790 | 87 | 2.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 1 | Mico |
61.8% | 6735 | 87 | 2.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▲ 1 | Starr Nova |
63.6% | 1645 | 66 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▲ 3 | Lumi |
63.3% | 1481 | 64 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▼ 4 | Gigi |
64.1% | 1042 | 59 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▲ 2 | Bolt |
61.5% | 1695 | 66 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 2 | Pierce |
61.4% | 1320 | 63 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▼ 2 | Chuck |
58.5% | 9755 | 93 | 4.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▲ 8 | Sirius |
59.9% | 1140 | 60 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▼ 5 | 8-Bit |
56.4% | 13926 | 98 | 5.8% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 8 | Shade |
58.9% | 1227 | 62 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | R-T |
60.5% | 618 | 51 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | ▲ 1 | Lola |
57.7% | 799 | 55 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 2 | Doug |
58.2% | 491 | 48 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 9 | Draco |
58.2% | 471 | 47 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 5 | Griff |
53.5% | 5853 | 85 | 2.4% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 4 | Nita |
53.0% | 8304 | 90 | 3.4% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 9 | Juju |
57.1% | 518 | 49 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 32 | Trunk |
57.5% | 438 | 46 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 1 | Stu |
56.7% | 506 | 48 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 12 | Bo |
53.7% | 1780 | 67 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 12 | Sam |
58.7% | 298 | 40 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 13 | Chester |
55.5% | 642 | 52 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Amber |
53.6% | 1524 | 65 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▼ 5 | Ruffs |
57.5% | 353 | 43 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 14 | Melodie |
52.1% | 4822 | 82 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 8 | Glowy |
54.8% | 513 | 49 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 13 | Gray |
56.2% | 299 | 40 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 18 | Sprout |
53.7% | 534 | 49 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Mandy |
51.1% | 2590 | 73 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 1 | Moe |
54.3% | 400 | 45 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▼ 17 | Jessie |
49.5% | 11601 | 95 | 4.8% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 12 | Nani |
51.8% | 931 | 57 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▼ 8 | Carl |
50.2% | 2989 | 75 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 5 | Angelo |
51.4% | 973 | 58 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 3 | Edgar |
48.6% | 10199 | 93 | 4.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 9 | Penny |
49.0% | 5018 | 83 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 5 | Mina |
53.1% | 309 | 41 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 16 | Najia |
51.7% | 429 | 46 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 10 | Finx |
52.5% | 236 | 37 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 17 | Bull |
47.9% | 4260 | 80 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 18 | Hank |
51.3% | 300 | 41 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 3 | Damian |
51.8% | 253 | 38 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 24 | Eve |
48.7% | 1334 | 63 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 16 | Meeple |
51.1% | 272 | 39 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
46.8% | 11517 | 95 | 4.8% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 2 | Ziggy |
50.9% | 291 | 40 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 6 | Janet |
51.9% | 185 | 33 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 11 | Colette |
46.8% | 5596 | 84 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 19 | Berry |
46.0% | 3518 | 77 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▲ 4 | Alli |
47.7% | 547 | 49 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▼ 15 | Meg |
45.9% | 4338 | 80 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 55 | – | Emz |
45.7% | 4201 | 80 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▼ 14 | Brock |
45.0% | 7934 | 90 | 3.3% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Darryl |
45.6% | 1848 | 68 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 2 | Willow |
47.1% | 312 | 41 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 3 | Bibi |
45.1% | 2608 | 73 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▲ 7 | Gus |
46.1% | 356 | 43 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 7 | Kit |
45.4% | 555 | 50 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 18 | Cordelius |
44.4% | 1446 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 11 | Jae-Yong |
45.4% | 196 | 34 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 5 | Pearl |
44.0% | 869 | 56 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 11 | Buzz |
43.5% | 1441 | 64 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▲ 7 | Mortis |
43.4% | 693 | 53 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 6 | Kenji |
42.7% | 1329 | 63 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 11 | Lily |
42.2% | 1009 | 59 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 7 | Barley |
40.6% | 2547 | 73 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 4 | Fang |
40.4% | 1108 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
40.0% | 1324 | 63 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▲ 5 | Ash |
39.8% | 752 | 54 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 14 | Frank |
39.3% | 2132 | 70 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 1 | Pam |
39.1% | 716 | 54 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▲ 5 | Crow |
38.9% | 4129 | 80 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 8 | Squeak |
39.0% | 1510 | 65 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▲ 13 | Rico |
38.7% | 4519 | 81 | 1.9% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 30 | Clancy |
38.9% | 1134 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 7 | Dynamike |
38.6% | 3491 | 77 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 16 | Larry & Lawrie |
38.5% | 1049 | 59 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 2 | Spike |
38.5% | 2236 | 71 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▼ 17 | Surge |
38.5% | 1506 | 65 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 13 | Gale |
37.6% | 721 | 54 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | El Primo |
37.6% | 2041 | 69 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▲ 5 | Tara |
36.5% | 968 | 58 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 14 | Jacky |
36.1% | 645 | 52 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 9 | Max |
36.4% | 1203 | 61 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 3 | Piper |
36.2% | 2285 | 71 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 1 | Byron |
36.1% | 1568 | 65 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 5 | Belle |
35.2% | 935 | 58 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 13 | Charlie |
34.7% | 714 | 53 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 21 | Lou |
34.5% | 882 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 11 | Rosa |
33.7% | 890 | 57 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 11 | Ollie |
28.9% | 225 | 36 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 3 | Poco |
33.3% | 1133 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 2 | Bonnie |
32.8% | 819 | 56 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 16 | Maisie |
32.5% | 742 | 54 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 3 | Shelly |
32.8% | 1851 | 68 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 4 | Bea |
31.1% | 833 | 56 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 8 | Mr. P |
30.4% | 771 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 8 | Grom |
30.5% | 871 | 56 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 3 | Leon |
30.6% | 1107 | 60 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 3 | Tick |
29.5% | 1701 | 66 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 9 | Buster |
24.7% | 373 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 3 | Sandy |
24.5% | 605 | 51 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | ▼ 1 | Gene |
20.4% | 436 | 46 | 0.2% | Rather not |