
Hot Zone
180,948 battles collected on this map — ranked only.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 26 of 105 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 77 s out of 77–105 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 7,999 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 473 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 7,999 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 473 real line-ups from a different rank tier, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (1,937 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here. The numbers also come from the solo queue: the battles behind them were fought by three strangers, not a practised team.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Doug |
66.3% | 34859 | 100 | 3.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | R-T |
66.5% | 11676 | 95 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Juju |
63.4% | 6941 | 88 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Hank |
62.2% | 10019 | 93 | 1.1% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Bibi |
60.5% | 33391 | 100 | 3.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Jacky |
60.1% | 9410 | 92 | 1.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Trunk |
56.2% | 84024 | 100 | 9.0% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Kenji |
55.3% | 12768 | 97 | 1.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Sirius |
54.8% | 12082 | 96 | 1.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Bull |
54.6% | 10666 | 94 | 1.1% | Good pick | ||
| 11 | – | Surge |
54.2% | 25725 | 100 | 2.8% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Edgar |
53.3% | 95617 | 100 | 10.3% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Cordelius |
53.8% | 7217 | 88 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Shade |
53.0% | 42343 | 100 | 4.5% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Mico |
52.7% | 15408 | 99 | 1.7% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Bolt |
53.6% | 2805 | 74 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | El Primo |
52.4% | 5784 | 85 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
51.7% | 4818 | 82 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 1 | Nita |
51.2% | 9513 | 92 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Sam |
54.5% | 508 | 48 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | – | Berry |
50.8% | 6972 | 88 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | – | Tick |
50.0% | 18302 | 100 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 23 | – | Buzz |
50.5% | 5310 | 83 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 24 | – | Nori |
49.4% | 87387 | 100 | 9.4% | Solid | ||
| 25 | – | Willow |
48.8% | 40614 | 100 | 4.4% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▲ 1 | Ash |
50.2% | 2364 | 71 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▲ 1 | Gigi |
50.4% | 1465 | 64 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 2 | Barley |
49.2% | 5870 | 85 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 1 | Chester |
49.3% | 4461 | 81 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▲ 1 | Damian |
49.2% | 4091 | 80 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▼ 2 | Mina |
49.8% | 1862 | 68 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Dynamike |
47.9% | 14311 | 98 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▲ 1 | Griff |
47.6% | 20430 | 100 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 1 | Kit |
48.3% | 4318 | 80 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▼ 1 | Starr Nova |
47.7% | 10284 | 93 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 36 | – | Stu |
47.8% | 4286 | 80 | 0.5% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Gale |
47.1% | 2828 | 74 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Lily |
46.8% | 3548 | 77 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 1 | Meeple |
46.0% | 3807 | 79 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 1 | Mortis |
45.5% | 9873 | 93 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Fang |
45.3% | 5303 | 83 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▲ 1 | Ruffs |
46.5% | 527 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 43 | ▼ 1 | Emz |
44.0% | 40377 | 100 | 4.3% | Rather not | ||
| 44 | – | Maisie |
45.7% | 820 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 45 | – | Lou |
44.6% | 3051 | 75 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 46 | – | Carl |
44.7% | 2629 | 73 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 47 | ▲ 1 | Draco |
45.3% | 761 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 48 | – | Bo |
43.6% | 14165 | 98 | 1.5% | Rather not | ||
| 49 | – | Darryl |
44.4% | 2436 | 72 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▼ 3 | Lumi |
44.4% | 2236 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▲ 2 | Pearl |
44.4% | 1927 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | – | Moe |
45.2% | 347 | 43 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | – | Otis |
43.9% | 2241 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | – | Spike |
42.8% | 10445 | 94 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | – | Frank |
42.6% | 10067 | 93 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | – | Shelly |
42.5% | 6559 | 87 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 2 | Rosa |
42.8% | 1352 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▲ 1 | Finx |
42.8% | 701 | 53 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▼ 1 | Chuck |
42.5% | 1552 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Ziggy |
42.5% | 881 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▲ 2 | Gray |
42.3% | 878 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 2 | Ollie |
41.2% | 148 | 30 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 2 | Melodie |
42.0% | 981 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 1 | Alli |
42.0% | 862 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | – | Clancy |
41.9% | 929 | 57 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Mr. P |
41.7% | 1139 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 1 | Kaze |
40.5% | 31612 | 100 | 3.4% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | – | Penny |
40.9% | 5218 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Meg |
40.7% | 4171 | 80 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | – | Amber |
41.0% | 1558 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 1 | Janet |
39.5% | 248 | 38 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 1 | Buster |
38.5% | 247 | 38 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Pierce |
39.5% | 2128 | 70 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | – | Najia |
39.6% | 1049 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | – | Jessie |
39.0% | 6695 | 87 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Leon |
39.1% | 3958 | 79 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Sandy |
38.7% | 1162 | 61 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 1 | Brock |
37.7% | 10930 | 94 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 3 | Poco |
37.7% | 1929 | 68 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | – | Mandy |
37.5% | 1335 | 63 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 2 | Squeak |
37.2% | 6884 | 87 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 1 | Glowy |
36.9% | 588 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 1 | Tara |
37.2% | 2282 | 71 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 4 | Angelo |
35.1% | 279 | 39 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 2 | Lola |
35.6% | 340 | 42 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | 8-Bit |
36.6% | 10295 | 93 | 1.1% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | – | Jae-Yong |
32.1% | 162 | 31 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Rico |
36.1% | 9361 | 92 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 1 | Charlie |
35.3% | 652 | 52 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 1 | Max |
35.9% | 2526 | 72 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 4 | Gus |
35.4% | 718 | 54 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Colette |
35.7% | 3133 | 76 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Sprout |
35.3% | 983 | 58 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 4 | Eve |
34.7% | 608 | 51 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | – | Crow |
35.0% | 6608 | 87 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▼ 3 | Nani |
34.4% | 863 | 56 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Pam |
33.3% | 1055 | 59 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Grom |
32.4% | 1111 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Bea |
31.5% | 1138 | 60 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Colt |
31.6% | 5156 | 83 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Byron |
29.3% | 1654 | 66 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Belle |
24.8% | 492 | 48 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▲ 1 | Bonnie |
19.5% | 442 | 46 | 0.0% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▼ 1 | Piper |
23.3% | 1521 | 65 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Gene |
16.8% | 446 | 46 | 0.0% | Rather not |