
Heist
31,767 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 41 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 3,057 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 240 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 3,057 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 240 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (37 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Nori |
68.5% | 16460 | 100 | 8.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | ▲ 5 | Wendy |
69.9% | 544 | 49 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Kaze |
63.4% | 5359 | 84 | 2.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 1 | Gigi |
66.3% | 1030 | 59 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | ▼ 2 | Mico |
62.6% | 6134 | 86 | 3.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 2 | Lumi |
63.0% | 1143 | 61 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Starr Nova |
62.0% | 1428 | 64 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 2 | Chuck |
59.0% | 6044 | 85 | 3.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | ▲ 3 | Sirius |
60.5% | 1283 | 62 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 10 | R-T |
63.7% | 496 | 48 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 2 | 8-Bit |
56.5% | 9217 | 92 | 4.8% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 4 | Lola |
60.4% | 614 | 51 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | ▼ 3 | Bolt |
58.2% | 1238 | 62 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 3 | Griff |
55.7% | 5017 | 83 | 2.6% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | Amber |
56.9% | 1500 | 65 | 0.8% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 1 | Pierce |
58.6% | 666 | 52 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 7 | Shade |
56.9% | 1041 | 59 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▼ 4 | Nita |
54.2% | 7497 | 89 | 3.9% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 6 | Doug |
58.3% | 521 | 49 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 3 | Ruffs |
58.5% | 402 | 45 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▼ 2 | Melodie |
52.8% | 4058 | 79 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 4 | Glowy |
56.0% | 425 | 46 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 23 | ▲ 10 | Chester |
53.9% | 670 | 53 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 24 | ▲ 2 | Trunk |
54.7% | 488 | 48 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 25 | ▲ 5 | Bull |
51.3% | 3731 | 78 | 2.0% | Solid | ||
| 26 | ▼ 4 | Carl |
51.4% | 2368 | 71 | 1.2% | Solid | ||
| 27 | ▲ 14 | Bo |
51.5% | 1339 | 63 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 28 | ▼ 6 | Mandy |
51.1% | 1831 | 68 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 29 | ▲ 10 | Draco |
53.6% | 472 | 47 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 30 | ▼ 5 | Jessie |
49.6% | 8974 | 91 | 4.7% | Solid | ||
| 31 | ▲ 18 | Ziggy |
54.2% | 336 | 42 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 32 | ▼ 1 | Sam |
54.9% | 277 | 39 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 33 | ▼ 3 | Moe |
53.5% | 389 | 44 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 34 | ▲ 1 | Nani |
51.8% | 680 | 53 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 11 | Willow |
52.7% | 395 | 45 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 36 | – | Juju |
53.9% | 256 | 38 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 3 | Sprout |
51.5% | 557 | 50 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 5 | Gray |
54.1% | 229 | 36 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 1 | Finx |
54.3% | 223 | 36 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 14 | Berry |
48.8% | 3096 | 75 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▲ 4 | Alli |
52.8% | 271 | 39 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 2 | Kit |
50.9% | 529 | 49 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▼ 14 | Edgar |
47.9% | 7766 | 89 | 4.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▼ 4 | Hank |
52.9% | 238 | 37 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▼ 13 | Colt |
47.3% | 10058 | 93 | 5.3% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 22 | Cordelius |
48.8% | 1232 | 62 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 10 | Penny |
46.4% | 4229 | 80 | 2.2% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 25 | Buzz |
47.3% | 1098 | 60 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▲ 14 | Stu |
48.2% | 371 | 44 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 50 | ▲ 14 | Janet |
49.2% | 181 | 33 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 51 | ▼ 3 | Jae-Yong |
49.4% | 164 | 31 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | ▲ 6 | Damian |
48.6% | 208 | 35 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | ▲ 3 | Mina |
48.3% | 232 | 37 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | ▼ 10 | Bibi |
45.5% | 2623 | 73 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 5 | Najia |
47.2% | 339 | 42 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 10 | Clancy |
44.9% | 1097 | 60 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | ▲ 1 | Brock |
44.0% | 5013 | 83 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | ▼ 11 | Colette |
43.6% | 4452 | 81 | 2.3% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 6 | Meeple |
45.1% | 257 | 38 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | – | Pearl |
43.9% | 792 | 55 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 9 | Meg |
43.4% | 1347 | 63 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 12 | Angelo |
42.5% | 200 | 34 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▲ 10 | Rico |
41.9% | 3952 | 79 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 10 | Emz |
41.8% | 3200 | 76 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 12 | Darryl |
41.9% | 1283 | 62 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 7 | Squeak |
41.6% | 1123 | 60 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 4 | Ollie |
39.5% | 114 | 26 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 6 | Gus |
39.6% | 278 | 39 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▲ 7 | Dynamike |
40.0% | 3052 | 75 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 11 | Fang |
40.3% | 872 | 56 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Frank |
40.2% | 1601 | 66 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | ▼ 17 | Mortis |
39.9% | 504 | 48 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 10 | Kenji |
40.0% | 1060 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▼ 12 | Tara |
39.6% | 743 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 14 | Surge |
39.3% | 1368 | 63 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 10 | Spike |
39.0% | 1691 | 66 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 3 | Buster |
38.0% | 308 | 41 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▲ 15 | Otis |
39.0% | 1042 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 8 | Maisie |
38.8% | 624 | 51 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▲ 5 | El Primo |
38.9% | 1667 | 66 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▼ 3 | Ash |
38.1% | 685 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 7 | Crow |
38.1% | 3411 | 77 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 3 | Barley |
38.1% | 2530 | 72 | 1.3% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▼ 14 | Eve |
37.4% | 396 | 45 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 6 | Pam |
37.7% | 599 | 51 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 5 | Charlie |
37.6% | 591 | 51 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▼ 13 | Larry & Lawrie |
36.7% | 1067 | 59 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▲ 5 | Rosa |
35.5% | 729 | 54 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 2 | Lily |
35.7% | 886 | 57 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▼ 6 | Gale |
35.1% | 616 | 51 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | ▼ 3 | Leon |
35.1% | 948 | 58 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▲ 2 | Jacky |
33.4% | 634 | 52 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 8 | Grom |
33.5% | 772 | 55 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 12 | Lou |
32.8% | 705 | 53 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 2 | Belle |
32.1% | 539 | 49 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 6 | Piper |
32.4% | 1257 | 62 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 1 | Poco |
32.1% | 935 | 58 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 5 | Shelly |
32.1% | 1381 | 63 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | – | Mr. P |
29.5% | 640 | 52 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | – | Byron |
29.7% | 1018 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 6 | Bonnie |
28.3% | 628 | 52 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 4 | Sandy |
27.4% | 529 | 49 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 14 | Gene |
24.7% | 361 | 43 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | ▲ 2 | Max |
28.1% | 999 | 59 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | ▼ 1 | Bea |
27.0% | 645 | 52 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Tick |
26.2% | 1494 | 65 | 0.8% | Rather not |