
Heist
47,891 battles collected on this map.
TIGHT — less choice than on most maps: 41 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 78 s out of 78–98 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 3,564 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 225 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 3,564 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 225 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (48 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Nori |
68.1% | 19301 | 100 | 6.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Mico |
61.9% | 8143 | 90 | 2.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | – | Wendy |
65.4% | 742 | 54 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | – | Kaze |
60.7% | 7110 | 88 | 2.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Bolt |
61.8% | 2064 | 69 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | – | Gigi |
62.4% | 1320 | 63 | 0.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | – | Lumi |
61.6% | 1867 | 68 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | – | Chuck |
59.0% | 17220 | 100 | 5.9% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Starr Nova |
59.8% | 2243 | 71 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | – | Sirius |
59.5% | 2417 | 72 | 0.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | – | 8-Bit |
56.8% | 14355 | 98 | 4.9% | Good pick | ||
| 12 | – | Doug |
60.2% | 689 | 53 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 13 | – | Pierce |
58.5% | 1234 | 62 | 0.4% | Good pick | ||
| 14 | – | Griff |
55.4% | 6937 | 87 | 2.4% | Good pick | ||
| 15 | – | R-T |
59.3% | 610 | 51 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 16 | – | Shade |
55.9% | 1832 | 68 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | – | Nita |
53.9% | 11134 | 95 | 3.8% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 1 | Mandy |
53.6% | 7981 | 90 | 2.7% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 1 | Damian |
59.1% | 411 | 45 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | – | Amber |
54.9% | 1839 | 68 | 0.6% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 1 | Trunk |
56.5% | 701 | 53 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▼ 1 | Melodie |
53.2% | 6156 | 86 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | – | Glowy |
57.4% | 516 | 49 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | – | Berry |
53.0% | 5992 | 85 | 2.1% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▲ 2 | Draco |
55.7% | 837 | 56 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Juju |
58.4% | 363 | 43 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▼ 1 | Bull |
52.5% | 8418 | 90 | 2.9% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | – | Ruffs |
56.0% | 541 | 49 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | – | Hank |
54.9% | 752 | 54 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 30 | – | Sprout |
53.7% | 975 | 58 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 31 | – | Chester |
53.9% | 889 | 57 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 32 | – | Ziggy |
55.8% | 430 | 46 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 33 | – | Sam |
55.3% | 400 | 45 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 34 | – | Jessie |
50.2% | 12981 | 97 | 4.5% | Solid | ||
| 35 | – | Emz |
50.3% | 6233 | 86 | 2.1% | Solid | ||
| 36 | – | Bo |
50.8% | 1790 | 67 | 0.6% | Solid | ||
| 37 | – | Najia |
53.7% | 350 | 43 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 38 | – | Finx |
53.5% | 269 | 39 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▲ 1 | Penny |
48.2% | 6675 | 87 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▼ 1 | Cordelius |
49.0% | 2131 | 70 | 0.7% | Solid | ||
| 41 | – | Moe |
50.8% | 494 | 48 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 42 | – | Carl |
48.4% | 3156 | 76 | 1.1% | Solid | ||
| 43 | – | Lola |
50.0% | 688 | 53 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 44 | – | Kit |
48.7% | 978 | 58 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 45 | – | Mina |
50.5% | 323 | 42 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▲ 1 | Willow |
49.5% | 493 | 48 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▼ 1 | Nani |
48.3% | 1042 | 59 | 0.4% | Solid | ||
| 48 | – | Rico |
46.2% | 9145 | 92 | 3.2% | Solid | ||
| 49 | – | Bibi |
46.5% | 4557 | 81 | 1.6% | Solid | ||
| 50 | – | Edgar |
46.0% | 10214 | 93 | 3.5% | Solid | ||
| 51 | – | Alli |
48.3% | 350 | 43 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 52 | – | Janet |
48.3% | 240 | 37 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 53 | – | Brock |
45.1% | 7600 | 89 | 2.6% | Rather not | ||
| 54 | – | Colt |
44.2% | 10743 | 94 | 3.7% | Rather not | ||
| 55 | ▼ 1 | Stu |
45.4% | 423 | 46 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 56 | ▲ 1 | Colette |
43.6% | 6766 | 87 | 2.3% | Rather not | ||
| 57 | – | Buzz |
43.9% | 1569 | 65 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 58 | – | Dynamike |
42.9% | 5106 | 83 | 1.8% | Rather not | ||
| 59 | ▲ 1 | Meeple |
43.9% | 303 | 41 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 1 | Jae-Yong |
43.5% | 177 | 33 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | – | Barley |
42.3% | 3572 | 78 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | – | Gray |
43.0% | 388 | 44 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | – | Pearl |
42.4% | 909 | 57 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▲ 2 | Meg |
42.0% | 1948 | 68 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 2 | Mortis |
42.2% | 846 | 56 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | – | Darryl |
41.7% | 1928 | 68 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▲ 1 | Lily |
41.5% | 1538 | 65 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▲ 2 | Angelo |
41.3% | 312 | 41 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | ▼ 2 | Gus |
41.3% | 387 | 44 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▼ 1 | Clancy |
41.3% | 1231 | 62 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | – | Surge |
40.3% | 1868 | 68 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Squeak |
39.7% | 1575 | 65 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | – | Frank |
38.9% | 2221 | 70 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 1 | Otis |
38.5% | 1674 | 66 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
38.5% | 949 | 58 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | – | Pam |
37.3% | 683 | 53 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | – | Fang |
37.3% | 1062 | 59 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | – | Spike |
36.9% | 2318 | 71 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▲ 1 | Larry & Lawrie |
36.7% | 1409 | 64 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 1 | Kenji |
36.6% | 1686 | 66 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | – | Tara |
36.4% | 940 | 58 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | – | Crow |
36.2% | 4714 | 82 | 1.6% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | – | Charlie |
36.0% | 776 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | – | Buster |
34.3% | 446 | 46 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | – | Gale |
35.0% | 779 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | – | Grom |
34.3% | 966 | 58 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 2 | Rosa |
33.7% | 1127 | 60 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | – | Piper |
33.9% | 1831 | 68 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▼ 2 | El Primo |
33.9% | 2298 | 71 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | – | Eve |
31.2% | 552 | 50 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Shelly |
32.6% | 2000 | 69 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | – | Belle |
30.6% | 790 | 55 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | – | Maisie |
30.2% | 857 | 56 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▲ 1 | Lou |
30.2% | 868 | 56 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▼ 1 | Leon |
30.5% | 1130 | 60 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | – | Ollie |
22.4% | 205 | 35 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | – | Mr. P |
29.2% | 862 | 56 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | – | Max |
29.1% | 1346 | 63 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 1 | Tick |
29.1% | 2041 | 69 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 1 | Jacky |
27.6% | 750 | 54 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | – | Byron |
28.5% | 1372 | 63 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | – | Bea |
27.4% | 878 | 57 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | – | Bonnie |
26.6% | 758 | 54 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Poco |
26.3% | 1052 | 59 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Sandy |
23.3% | 673 | 53 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
18.2% | 506 | 48 | 0.2% | Rather not |