
Heist
95,010 battles collected on this map.
MEDIUM — an average amount of choice: 49 of 106 brawlers above 50%.
Short rounds Median 80 s out of 80–99 s in this mode. Early pressure pays off — anyone looking to outplay is playing against the map.
From the ratio of pick rate to win rate: what is underrated — and what gets picked a lot but loses.
The strongest three-brawler line-ups for this map, computed from the three brawlers' strength here and their pair effects in the mode. If you just want to settle it quickly: the top three.
Searched freely across 3,267 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, calibrated against 647 real line-ups.
What you see here. The best three-brawler line-up that can be assembled for this one map — computed, not counted. On a single map hardly any line-up has enough games for a measured number of its own, so it is assembled from the individual strengths and the pair effects, then calibrated against real line-ups.
Best · on this map. All 3,267 combinations of this map's 40 best brawlers, scored from their strength here and their pair effects in this mode — the same calculation as the draft helper, only without opponents. How much of it comes through is not guessed but calibrated against 647 real line-ups from a different half of the battles, so the calculation cannot measure itself.
What the calculation cannot do: check itself. Measured against line-ups that actually exist, the projection errs low rather than high — across all modes the top six came out between 4.9 points too high and 9.1 too low, the top ten percent to within a point. For a line-up nobody plays there is no such check, and sometimes there is a reason nobody plays it. The list is therefore cut off at the measured boundary: it shows the best line-up for which any evidence still exists, not the best that can be computed. The calculation does produce higher ones (14 of them on this map) — they sit outside anything ever measured, which is why they are not shown here.
Including the thin ones — the games column tells you how seriously to take a row. The win rate tells you how good a brawler is. The trust score (0–100) tells you how much you can believe it — it depends purely on the number of games. Sorting uses both together: 52% from 75 games can be luck, 51% from 3,000 games cannot. Die Pfeile zeigen die Verschiebung gegenüber dem Stand von gestern, hier gerechnet nur für diese Map.
| # | Brawler | Win rate | Games | Trust | Pick rate | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Nori |
68.4% | 41347 | 100 | 7.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 2 | – | Mico |
62.3% | 14831 | 99 | 2.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 3 | ▲ 4 | Bolt |
63.3% | 3616 | 78 | 0.6% | Strong pick | ||
| 4 | ▲ 2 | Lumi |
63.1% | 3956 | 79 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 5 | – | Gigi |
63.8% | 2382 | 72 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 6 | ▼ 3 | Kaze |
61.8% | 15365 | 99 | 2.8% | Strong pick | ||
| 7 | ▲ 2 | Starr Nova |
61.9% | 4120 | 80 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 8 | ▼ 5 | Wendy |
63.7% | 1321 | 63 | 0.2% | Strong pick | ||
| 9 | – | Chuck |
60.3% | 30046 | 100 | 4.5% | Strong pick | ||
| 10 | ▲ 2 | R-T |
62.5% | 1582 | 65 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 11 | ▼ 1 | Sirius |
60.4% | 3442 | 77 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 12 | ▲ 5 | Trunk |
61.8% | 1482 | 64 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 13 | ▲ 2 | Shade |
59.9% | 3984 | 79 | 0.7% | Strong pick | ||
| 14 | ▼ 1 | Doug |
61.5% | 1459 | 64 | 0.3% | Strong pick | ||
| 15 | ▼ 1 | Pierce |
60.0% | 2392 | 72 | 0.4% | Strong pick | ||
| 16 | ▲ 3 | Glowy |
60.9% | 1127 | 60 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 17 | ▲ 3 | Draco |
59.6% | 1557 | 65 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 18 | ▲ 3 | Amber |
57.2% | 3202 | 76 | 0.5% | Good pick | ||
| 19 | ▼ 8 | 8-Bit |
55.4% | 27675 | 100 | 4.7% | Good pick | ||
| 20 | ▲ 10 | Ziggy |
59.3% | 827 | 56 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 21 | ▲ 4 | Ruffs |
58.7% | 962 | 58 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 22 | ▲ 7 | Sprout |
57.4% | 1697 | 66 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 23 | ▲ 10 | Bo |
56.0% | 3749 | 78 | 0.7% | Good pick | ||
| 24 | ▲ 7 | Sam |
58.6% | 829 | 56 | 0.2% | Good pick | ||
| 25 | ▼ 2 | Mandy |
54.7% | 9946 | 93 | 1.0% | Good pick | ||
| 26 | ▲ 10 | Najia |
58.3% | 707 | 53 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 27 | ▲ 5 | Chester |
56.1% | 1659 | 66 | 0.3% | Good pick | ||
| 28 | ▲ 6 | Hank |
56.9% | 1058 | 59 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 29 | ▼ 6 | Juju |
58.3% | 599 | 51 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 30 | ▼ 13 | Griff |
53.8% | 14562 | 99 | 2.7% | Good pick | ||
| 31 | ▼ 9 | Nita |
53.4% | 21446 | 100 | 3.7% | Good pick | ||
| 32 | ▼ 14 | Damian |
57.4% | 702 | 53 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 33 | ▲ 4 | Finx |
57.2% | 498 | 48 | 0.1% | Good pick | ||
| 34 | ▲ 17 | Nani |
54.1% | 1714 | 67 | 0.3% | Solid | ||
| 35 | ▲ 7 | Lola |
54.4% | 1398 | 64 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 36 | ▲ 6 | Moe |
54.9% | 805 | 55 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 37 | ▼ 10 | Berry |
51.9% | 11571 | 95 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 38 | ▲ 16 | Stu |
54.1% | 1005 | 59 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 39 | ▼ 12 | Melodie |
51.3% | 11199 | 95 | 1.8% | Solid | ||
| 40 | ▲ 4 | Kit |
52.8% | 1569 | 65 | 0.2% | Solid | ||
| 41 | ▼ 2 | Penny |
50.9% | 13386 | 97 | 2.3% | Solid | ||
| 42 | ▼ 14 | Bull |
50.3% | 15233 | 99 | 2.5% | Solid | ||
| 43 | ▲ 2 | Willow |
52.9% | 845 | 56 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 44 | ▲ 4 | Mina |
53.3% | 619 | 51 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 45 | ▲ 5 | Alli |
52.6% | 661 | 52 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 46 | ▼ 6 | Carl |
49.6% | 6920 | 87 | 1.3% | Solid | ||
| 47 | ▲ 11 | Jae-Yong |
53.7% | 363 | 43 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 48 | ▲ 4 | Janet |
52.2% | 429 | 46 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 49 | ▼ 14 | Jessie |
48.1% | 24460 | 100 | 4.1% | Solid | ||
| 50 | ▲ 13 | Gray |
50.9% | 700 | 53 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 51 | ▼ 13 | Emz |
48.1% | 11291 | 95 | 1.9% | Solid | ||
| 52 | ▼ 11 | Cordelius |
48.3% | 4892 | 82 | 1.0% | Solid | ||
| 53 | ▲ 15 | Angelo |
50.3% | 579 | 50 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 54 | ▲ 6 | Meeple |
49.9% | 641 | 52 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 55 | ▲ 11 | Gus |
49.6% | 787 | 55 | 0.1% | Solid | ||
| 56 | ▼ 10 | Bibi |
47.3% | 8809 | 91 | 1.5% | Solid | ||
| 57 | ▼ 10 | Rico |
46.9% | 19943 | 100 | 3.8% | Solid | ||
| 58 | ▼ 9 | Edgar |
46.3% | 21861 | 100 | 4.1% | Solid | ||
| 59 | ▲ 8 | Mortis |
46.2% | 1786 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 60 | ▼ 5 | Colt |
44.6% | 22449 | 100 | 4.1% | Rather not | ||
| 61 | ▼ 5 | Colette |
44.5% | 12801 | 97 | 2.1% | Rather not | ||
| 62 | ▼ 1 | Barley |
44.7% | 6894 | 87 | 1.2% | Rather not | ||
| 63 | ▼ 10 | Brock |
44.1% | 16151 | 100 | 3.0% | Rather not | ||
| 64 | ▼ 5 | Dynamike |
42.8% | 9968 | 93 | 1.7% | Rather not | ||
| 65 | ▼ 3 | Pearl |
43.5% | 2002 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 66 | ▼ 2 | Darryl |
43.1% | 4050 | 79 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 67 | ▼ 10 | Buzz |
42.3% | 3754 | 78 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 68 | ▼ 3 | Lily |
40.7% | 3230 | 76 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 69 | – | Meg |
40.1% | 4224 | 80 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 70 | ▲ 1 | Surge |
39.5% | 3926 | 79 | 0.7% | Rather not | ||
| 71 | ▲ 5 | Pam |
39.2% | 1582 | 65 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 72 | – | Frank |
38.6% | 5116 | 83 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 73 | ▲ 8 | Larry & Lawrie |
38.7% | 2814 | 74 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 74 | ▲ 8 | Crow |
38.2% | 8559 | 91 | 1.4% | Rather not | ||
| 75 | ▼ 1 | Otis |
38.4% | 3504 | 77 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 76 | ▼ 1 | Ash |
38.5% | 2013 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 77 | ▼ 7 | Clancy |
38.0% | 2751 | 74 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 78 | ▼ 5 | Squeak |
37.3% | 3259 | 76 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 79 | ▼ 1 | Kenji |
36.7% | 3166 | 76 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 80 | ▼ 3 | Spike |
36.6% | 4834 | 82 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 81 | ▲ 5 | El Primo |
36.2% | 5102 | 83 | 1.0% | Rather not | ||
| 82 | ▲ 2 | Gale |
35.3% | 1670 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 83 | ▼ 4 | Tara |
34.6% | 2164 | 70 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 84 | ▲ 1 | Rosa |
34.5% | 2275 | 71 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 85 | ▼ 2 | Charlie |
34.2% | 1717 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 86 | ▲ 3 | Piper |
34.0% | 3537 | 77 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 87 | ▲ 12 | Jacky |
33.7% | 1649 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 88 | ▼ 8 | Fang |
33.8% | 2659 | 73 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 89 | ▲ 11 | Tick |
32.6% | 4159 | 80 | 0.8% | Rather not | ||
| 90 | ▲ 7 | Max |
32.3% | 2604 | 73 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 91 | – | Shelly |
31.3% | 4517 | 81 | 0.9% | Rather not | ||
| 92 | ▼ 4 | Grom |
31.1% | 2116 | 70 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 93 | ▲ 1 | Leon |
31.2% | 2626 | 73 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 94 | ▼ 4 | Belle |
30.5% | 2016 | 69 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 95 | ▲ 7 | Poco |
30.0% | 2550 | 73 | 0.5% | Rather not | ||
| 96 | ▲ 2 | Mr. P |
29.8% | 1673 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 97 | ▼ 5 | Lou |
29.8% | 1921 | 68 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 98 | ▲ 5 | Bea |
29.6% | 1843 | 68 | 0.4% | Rather not | ||
| 99 | ▲ 2 | Byron |
29.7% | 2941 | 75 | 0.6% | Rather not | ||
| 100 | ▼ 13 | Buster |
27.8% | 921 | 57 | 0.2% | Rather not | ||
| 101 | ▼ 5 | Maisie |
28.3% | 1725 | 67 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 102 | ▼ 9 | Eve |
27.7% | 1297 | 62 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 103 | ▼ 8 | Ollie |
25.0% | 513 | 49 | 0.1% | Rather not | ||
| 104 | – | Bonnie |
26.7% | 1688 | 66 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 105 | – | Sandy |
23.2% | 1363 | 63 | 0.3% | Rather not | ||
| 106 | – | Gene |
18.8% | 1064 | 59 | 0.2% | Rather not |